I inculcated the rudiments of the sweet tongue of La Fontaine into the minds of undergraduates.
Or I attempted to.
University students, no less!
I inculcated the rudiments of the sweet tongue of La Fontaine into the minds of undergraduates.
Or I attempted to.
The reason you got that reaction is that you were unwilling to correct your game breaking mistake. Also yes you can start a game without 17 players.I had a plan and I tried to follow it. Then you behaved ridiculous and overreacted.
We could have just continued the game. We could have started a new game after we completed it.
There was no reason for you to react as you did. It was completely unneccesary.
Also, do a Lite need to be 17 players? Can it be less?
It was not game breaking. I had planned it. We could have just continued with the game anyway. Anyway, we could always have started a new game, it wasn't neccesary at all to react like that. For multiple mistakes, I can understand. But not to react to one mistake, that way.The reason you got that reaction is that you were unwilling to correct your game breaking mistake. Also yes you can start a game without 17 players.
As mentioned the reaction was due to you appearing unwilling to correct your errors. Whether or not that was what you meant, that was how your actions came across.It was not game breaking. I had planned it. We could have just continued with the game anyway. Anyway, we could always have started a new game, it wasn't neccesary at all to react like that. For multiple mistakes, I can understand. But not to react to one mistake, that way.
The game might not have been optimal but still playable.
I was willing to have a hunt anyway later. I didn't say I didn't get the hunt order because I thought I would be giving away too much information. That was also a mistake on my part. It was unfortunately not a very active game. Which it needed to be to be that short. You make mistakes, you do. It's unfortunate but you shouldn't overreact if someone makes them.As mentioned the reaction was due to you appearing unwilling to correct your errors. Whether or not that was what you meant, that was how your actions came across.
You cannot just compensate with a hunt later which you were told; you were also told that in case no hunt had been sent then you should state there was no hunt. And yet you decided to execute a late hunt. Anyway if you show improvement in your play you probably will be allowed to try GMing again.I was willing to have a hunt anyway later. I didn't say I didn't get the hunt order because I thought I would be giving away too much information. That was also a mistake on my part. It was unfortunately not a very active game. Which it needed to be to be that short. You make mistakes, you do. It's unfortunate but you shouldn't overreact if someone makes them.
Yes, that's how it was supposed to be.OK guys enough please! But if I actually do a micro after one of the lites end, I would like a definitive ruleset. So the hunt is after night 1(assuming day 1 is first lynch)? Is it like this:
Thing #:Remaining players
Night 0: no hunt-5 players
Day 1:Lynch-4 players
Night 2:hunt-3 players
Day 2: lynch- 2 players/end of game.
Is this correct?
I will probably never be a good player. I would be a better GM. It just fit my skills better.You cannot just compensate with a hunt later which you were told; you were also told that in case no hunt had been sent then you should state there was no hunt. And yet you decided to execute a late hunt. Anyway if you show improvement in your play you probably will be allowed to try GMing again.
If you just give up like that you will never improve. Try taking a look at the FAQ and MC's guide to analysis and try to follow some of the advice. Then you will notice that you will make improvements. Just look at luft.I will probably never be a good player. I would be a better GM. It just fit my skills better.
I appreciate that you think that I can become better.If you just give up like that you will never improve. Try taking a look at the FAQ and MC's guide to analysis and try to follow some of the advice. Then you will notice that you will make improvements. Just look at luft.
No we are allowed to advertise in OT. There are several advertisement threads already, though you can make a new one should you so fancy. We just cannot use more than one at a time.I appreciate that you think that I can become better.
Also, it's against the rules to make a Werewolf announcement thread in the OT?
That was what I meant. I can't make a thread for the n00b game to find new players.No we are allowed to advertise in OT. There are several advertisement threads already, though you can make a new one should you so fancy. We just cannot use more than one at a time.
Why can't you that? If the advertisement thread hasn't been used for a while you are allowed to make a new one.I can't make a thread for the n00b game to find new players.
I already used it. The point was making a thread specifically for the n00b game. Getting new players to try Werewolf.Why can't you that? If the advertisement thread hasn't been used for a while you are allowed to make a new one.
Use the Bladephone to ask Blade! if you are allowed to do it; though you probably aren't. But that is where you need to ask.I already used it. The point was making a thread specifically for the n00b game. Getting new players to try Werewolf.
Off the top of my head this is right.OK guys enough please! But if I actually do a micro after one of the lites end, I would like a definitive ruleset. So the hunt is after night 1(assuming day 1 is first lynch)? Is it like this:
Thing #:Remaining players
Night 0: no hunt-5 players
Day 1:Lynch-4 players
Night 2:hunt-3 players
Day 2: lynch- 2 players/end of game.
Is this correct?