-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Hmm. Might be interesting, and I have every confidence in your competence as a GM (just not so much in your judgment when making game setups for WW). I'd consider joining.
Are you going to cry if we tell you it sucks? Because that was pathetic last time.
I'm in.
I'm in.
It'd take me a little bit to get used to it, but I'd be down for trying this game
I've learned my lesson, when I bother GMing again, I'mma shoot the setup to one of the vets first.
A surprisingly apt lesson to have learned!
Count me intertrested as well, by the way.
A what?
Be fair with yourself. You've been a consistently fine administrator of games. You're like the completely competent ticket conductor on the express train to hell.
As long as the setup works you should be fine.
A slip of the tongue. What, I believe, he meant to say was ''14 page Big''.
I could be wrong tho. I could just be being an asshole who knows.
14 pages without even starting isn't so bad
The game would have been fine if drxav had told me about the rule flaw rather than exploited it, or Cakravarti and johho hadn't got prissy about correcting it and re-rolling roles on day zero.
They say the best defence is a good offence, but they also say people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. You chose the former options but was it the right one? Tune it at 11 for the results show.14 pages without even starting isn't so bad
The game would have been fine if drxav had told me about the rule flaw rather than exploited it, or Cakravarti and johho hadn't got prissy about correcting it and re-rolling roles on day zero.
I actually never realised until now your game had as many as 26 players though. I always thought it must have been a small amount of players. And players are the worst, in fairness, and I should know.
They say the best defence is a good offence, but they also say people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. You chose the former options but was it the right one? Tune it at 11 for the results show.
I actually never realised until now your game had as many as 26 players though. I always thought it must have been a small amount of players. And players are the worst, in fairness, and I should know.
Of course it had plenty of players. It failed to start due to a small subset of them acting like gits. I believe the words I used at the time were "toxic environment". I stand by them, assuming I made them. There's a reason I've played relatively few games over the last four years of being active here. It has got better, which might surprise some of the new faces.
They say the best defence is a good offence, but they also say people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. You chose the former options but was it the right one? Tune it at 11 for the results show.
I actually never realised until now your game had as many as 26 players though. I always thought it must have been a small amount of players. And players are the worst, in fairness, and I should know.
You must quite envy me then.
