• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

marty99

elite forumite
40 Badges
Apr 21, 2009
329
1.852
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Semper Fi
  • Hearts of Iron III: Their Finest Hour
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • For the Motherland
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis III: Chronicles
  • Stellaris
  • Mount & Blade: Warband
  • Mount & Blade: With Fire and Sword
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Europa Universalis 4: Emperor
  • Imperator: Rome - Magna Graecia
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Imperator: Rome
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cradle of Civilization
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Europa Universalis IV: Dharma
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mandate of Heaven
  • Europa Universalis IV: Third Rome
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • 500k Club
  • War of the Roses
  • Victoria 2
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Crusader Kings II: Sunset Invasion
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
I don't have much to add, as I think everything has been said already, let me just say I agree in principle with the ban proposals and sign up to COWZ
I don't think a mini-mod for this forum would be necessary though, definitely not so so soon after a warning by Blade!, we are still officially in a trial phase for this forum after all
 

jonti-h

Evil overlord
7 Badges
Jun 21, 2006
2.358
1
  • Hearts of Iron II: Armageddon
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Victoria: Revolutions
  • 500k Club
A mini mod was ruled out at the start of this forum, and I can't see the policy being changed. It shouldn't be requested either in my view. If anything needs mod action then it violates the global forum rules, and Blade! will act. However, as this subforum is a trial one, and WW doesn't relate to Paradox's business we should avoid any need for mod action. That is why we have to self-police. If players know that if they behave badly (excessive swearing and insulting of other players, rule violations etc) they will be hanged, autolynched/subbed and or banned they won't do it.
 

OrangeYoshi

Mushroom Korps Field Marshal
20 Badges
Mar 6, 2009
9.722
0
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Semper Fi
  • Rome Gold
  • Victoria: Revolutions
  • Legio
  • Iron Cross
  • Heir to the Throne
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Divine Wind
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Deus Vult
  • Hearts of Iron II: Armageddon
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Victoria 2
  • 500k Club
  • Cities: Skylines
  • Stellaris
  • The Kings Crusade
Is it just me that doesn't see why taking a stress or time-sink off of Blade! and leaving it to someone that is always here and always knows exactly what is going on isn't a good thing?

The whole point is that they may very well shut down this sub-forum and boot us completely rather than creating another mod position. If this sub-forum is so troubled that it needs its own dedicated mod, Paradox could, and arguably should, close it up for good.

Again not only do I think it would not be a good idea, I personally, would be very upset if the request was even made to Blade!.

It isn't that it is troubled, it is that we can quickly enforce our own rules if quick action is needed.

Yes, I think most people except OY agree that we should not bother the admins unless absolutely necessary.

There is no need for admins to step in and do anything, just a suggestion for a player/mod.

A mini mod was ruled out at the start of this forum, and I can't see the policy being changed. It shouldn't be requested either in my view. If anything needs mod action then it violates the global forum rules, and Blade! will act. However, as this subforum is a trial one, and WW doesn't relate to Paradox's business we should avoid any need for mod action. That is why we have to self-police. If players know that if they behave badly (excessive swearing and insulting of other players, rule violations etc) they will be hanged, autolynched/subbed and or banned they won't do it.

Also, am I the only one that doesn't see a mod/player as still us policing ourselves? Also, why was it ruled out when the sub-forum was created?

The "mini-mod" suggestion is retarded. exactly what would you accomplish by that?

We wouldn't annoy Blade! for anything that would require mod powers to do.
 
Last edited:

EUROO7

Doctor Cisor -- Lycanthroporthodontic Specialist
30 Badges
Jan 26, 2008
5.088
198
  • Achtung Panzer
  • Victoria 3 Sign Up
How about you leave the discussion to people who will actually discuss things, and take your childishness elsewhere? Hmm?
Only you are discussing this. Everyone else is sayin no.
 

OrangeYoshi

Mushroom Korps Field Marshal
20 Badges
Mar 6, 2009
9.722
0
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Semper Fi
  • Rome Gold
  • Victoria: Revolutions
  • Legio
  • Iron Cross
  • Heir to the Throne
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Divine Wind
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Deus Vult
  • Hearts of Iron II: Armageddon
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Victoria 2
  • 500k Club
  • Cities: Skylines
  • Stellaris
  • The Kings Crusade
Ok, you keep discussing how retarded your idea is.
I find it funny that no one can explain why the idea is "retarded", and they simply focus on not wanting to bother the admins with proposing it in the first place. jonti gave a hint of a reason, but has yet replied as to what that reason was that it was ruled out when the sub-forum was created.

My point is that our power is not real. We can't really ban people from posting in threads, although we can ban them from playing in games. If a lifetime ban were instituted, (or any ban) then we'd need ways to deal with that person and keep him from posting at all in that game(s). We can't do that as simple forumites, we'd need mod power. My proposal would simply give us that power, while taking away some of that responsibility from Blade! so he can work on more important things, and we'd still be policing ourselves.
 

EUROO7

Doctor Cisor -- Lycanthroporthodontic Specialist
30 Badges
Jan 26, 2008
5.088
198
  • Achtung Panzer
  • Victoria 3 Sign Up
I find it funny that no one can explain why the idea is "retarded", and they simply focus on not wanting to bother the admins.
Yes, if only someone had explained.

A mini mod was ruled out at the start of this forum, and I can't see the policy being changed. It shouldn't be requested either in my view. If anything needs mod action then it violates the global forum rules, and Blade! will act. However, as this subforum is a trial one, and WW doesn't relate to Paradox's business we should avoid any need for mod action. That is why we have to self-police. If players know that if they behave badly (excessive swearing and insulting of other players, rule violations etc) they will be hanged, autolynched/subbed and or banned they won't do it.

The whole point is that they may very well shut down this sub-forum and boot us completely rather than creating another mod position. If this sub-forum is so troubled that it needs its own dedicated mod, Paradox could, and arguably should, close it up for good.

Again not only do I think it would not be a good idea, I personally, would be very upset if the request was even made to Blade!.

Absolutely. Not only do we not need a WW mod, I can't think of many things that would be a worse idea. It was made clear when this sub-forum was created that if we were noticed we would be gone; asking for a new mod because we can't police our selves would be very noticeable.

I am not misinterpreting you. I don't agree with you. I don't think there is obviously someone needed with official powers. I just don't see the need. The examples you site are not something we will need our own mod for. If someone is misbehaving so much that a subforum ban is called for, that person falls under normal forum rules. There is no special subforum case necessary. Banning someone from a game, doesn't take a mod and doesn't mean that person needs to be banned from the subforum. We also don't need a whole mod only for thread name changes, we have the Blade! phone for non critical stuff like that.

I don't think a mini-mod for this forum would be necessary though, definitely not so so soon after a warning by Blade!, we are still officially in a trial phase for this forum after all
 

OrangeYoshi

Mushroom Korps Field Marshal
20 Badges
Mar 6, 2009
9.722
0
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Semper Fi
  • Rome Gold
  • Victoria: Revolutions
  • Legio
  • Iron Cross
  • Heir to the Throne
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Divine Wind
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Deus Vult
  • Hearts of Iron II: Armageddon
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Victoria 2
  • 500k Club
  • Cities: Skylines
  • Stellaris
  • The Kings Crusade
Yes, if only someone had explained.
You simply proved my point. Those are mostly posts about how we might draw more attention and/or get shut down if we asked for our own self-policing mod. They don't explain how the idea itself is bad, just discuss how getting it to happen might take work.

Slinky there gives the best argument. To him I'd say that our purposes for a ban woulldn't exactly be breaking the forum rules, just ours. Therefore, we'd need special reasons to ban him from accessing our games and ruining them (as a person like Hax seems to do continuously), that isn't there in the forum rules for the rest of the board.

Remember that actual use of power would be very rare. Just as rare as these rules are broken. I say this would actually make us less noticeable, not more.
 

EUROO7

Doctor Cisor -- Lycanthroporthodontic Specialist
30 Badges
Jan 26, 2008
5.088
198
  • Achtung Panzer
  • Victoria 3 Sign Up
You simply proved my point. Those are mostly posts about how we might draw more attention and/or get shut down if we asked for our own self-policing mod. They don't explain how the idea itself is bad, just discuss how getting it to happen might take work.

Slinky there gives the best argument. To him I'd say that our purposes for a ban woulldn't exactly be breaking the forum rules, just ours. Therefore, we'd need special reasons to ban him from accessing our games and ruining them (as a person like Hax seems to do continuously), that isn't there in the forum rules for the rest of the board.

Remember that actual use of power would be very rare. Just as rare as these rules are broken. I say this would actually make us less noticeable, not more.
If the power is going to be so rare, why create a different position to take care of it?
 

EUROO7

Doctor Cisor -- Lycanthroporthodontic Specialist
30 Badges
Jan 26, 2008
5.088
198
  • Achtung Panzer
  • Victoria 3 Sign Up
Simply so that we wouldn't need to call in Blade! (and thus get noticed) when we need to exercise the enforcement of our most important rules.
We don't need to ban a person from the forum (I doubt that's possible anyway) for us to enforce the rules. He just won't be given a role.

You are overcomplicating the enforcement of the rules.
 

OrangeYoshi

Mushroom Korps Field Marshal
20 Badges
Mar 6, 2009
9.722
0
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Semper Fi
  • Rome Gold
  • Victoria: Revolutions
  • Legio
  • Iron Cross
  • Heir to the Throne
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Divine Wind
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Deus Vult
  • Hearts of Iron II: Armageddon
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Victoria 2
  • 500k Club
  • Cities: Skylines
  • Stellaris
  • The Kings Crusade
We don't need to ban a person from the forum (I doubt that's possible anyway) for us to enforce the rules. He just won't be given a role.

You are overcomplicating the enforcement of the rules.
Then what will we do when a person does things like Hax is doing and continually bothers the threads posting more, supposedly, secret information? We can't simply ban him from posting right now. We'd need something stronger.
 

EUROO7

Doctor Cisor -- Lycanthroporthodontic Specialist
30 Badges
Jan 26, 2008
5.088
198
  • Achtung Panzer
  • Victoria 3 Sign Up
Then what will we do when a person does things like Hax is doing and continually bothers the threads posting more, supposedly, secret information? We can't simply ban him from posting right now. We'd need something stronger.
If he's not given a role, he has no secret information. If he spams, we can report him to Blade!