-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
In the category: Truth is stranger than fiction:
http://www.popehat.com/2013/11/26/d...dment-trumps-birthers-stupid-people-walruses/
Wait .. a court ruled that these people did *what*?!?
Now at least I know why walrus isn't frequenting these forums a lot anymore
Snuskig, very snuskig
Werewolf CL is trundling into Slough, and isn't going to last more than two days from now. So we should find a GM for WW CLI, which I imagine would be the last game before the Christmas special (WW CLII?).
Would the next one not be the Christmas special? Allowing a week for your game to finish and sign-ups for the next one, it would probably overlap Christmas Day.
If you do it based on when the thread was put up and when it will finish, and assume it will finish tomorrow evening, it will have been 14 days. 14 days from tomorrow is the 22nd - if CLI is just as long as CL there probably won't be a game going on Christmas Day, which isn't such a bad thing.
Though I tend not to wait too long for signups (no more than 3 days) and to extract a 10-night game from 26 is quite good. It could quite easily have been half as long.
Also, Yakman hasn't been online in a month and he was the one who bagsied the Christmas game.
Though I tend not to wait too long for signups (no more than 3 days) and to extract a 10-night game from 26 is quite good. It could quite easily have been half as long.
Also, Yakman hasn't been online in a month and he was the one who bagsied the Christmas game.
I'd like to reserve the right to host werewolf CLII, as hopefully it will start very soon after my exams and I'll have time to be a competent GM. I've also got quite a few things I'd like to try out...
This is always a good thing to aim for. However this
makes me a bit worried. Blancing a big game is hard enough as it is without changing too many things at once.
For a first time Big WW GM I recommend to copy the rules from a successful game and change no more than one thing. Zero is probably better than one.
I'm not trying to discourage you from hosting or anything but remember that the game is there for the players to have fun with, not for the GM to have fun with the players. Usually just being able to look behind the curtains in all the camps and see how they think is enough fun for the GM.
We mustn't stifle creativity from an untested source. Perhaps Panzer is the GM Werewolf deserves.
But johho is, as always, right.
For your first game to be successful, the tweaks must be kept to a minimum.
For your first game to be successful, the tweaks must be kept to a minimum.
Alright, I think you're right actually. So let's start out normal, I can always try the fancy stuff later
This is very unlike you. Remember your reaction to my minor changes in a game?
Either Way I tried to change some things panzer and I ended up with a game of ten people that ended in two days and a lot of criticism so watch out. Really I'd keep the changes very minimum also you need to clear them with jacob as there are things you can't do because of forum rules.
Exactly and there is still much potential to wreck a game using normal rules.Alright, I think you're right actually. So let's start out normal, I can always try the fancy stuff later
Just check my first game for reference... oActually, this is also true. White Daimon and Ironhead 5 - both very good GMs - made some really interesting trainwrecks of games.
Speaking of trainwreaks, someone should host a game of weresistance, a half-baked idea thought up in the resistance discussion thread.
Given that it was my idea, I insist on it being my game to run.
I'd come up with something, if we can get enough to play. I'll even have a solid background story.
(And the rest of you should refrain from turning this into a relationship advice thread.)
I'd come up with something, if we can get enough to play. I'll even have a solid background story.
(And the rest of you should refrain from turning this into a relationship advice thread.)
Your aloofness is a clear indicator of an unwillingess to commit. If you don't commit, you don't get hurt. Bet that's your philosophy, huh?