-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
I'm truly sorry but I too feel by our black hearth that we must take out our regret.. We may feel sorry for our victims but never regret..
VOTE REGRET aka EDZAKO
VOTE REGRET aka EDZAKO
HAHAHAHAHA!
Oh what a joyous game! What wonderful delights do we face! Oh I am absolutely discombobulated with joy! For I am Euphoria!
I think it would be marvellous to
Vote Adamus on this pointless yet fantastic day!
Oh what a joyous game! What wonderful delights do we face! Oh I am absolutely discombobulated with joy! For I am Euphoria!
I think it would be marvellous to
Vote Adamus on this pointless yet fantastic day!
Wait a minute...this isn't Hawaii. I knew I shouldn't have trusted that 99 cent travel agent!
hmmmm...this place seems totally empty. A large void. Nothing here. Some ramblings tossing about.
vote enkhuush
hmmmm...this place seems totally empty. A large void. Nothing here. Some ramblings tossing about.
vote enkhuush
I'm touched, OrangeYoshi. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, after all.Are you tired of seeing marty99 coming back to Werewolf?
Do you yearn to see his neck snapped cleanly in two, sending his puglike face into a spasm of agony?
Have you had too much cynicism in your lives without him spouting off?
Again?
Then join the lynch marty99 campaign today!
Membership requires three simple steps:
1: To profess a burning hatred of marty99 and all he believes in
2: Publicly denounce him in the thread
3: Vote marty99
For just these three simple steps, you can make a lot of people very happy.
Terms and conditions may apply
You may be seen as an outed wolf if you follow this
However, I don't believe I'm that cynical a person. (EDIT: What game was that from again?)Vote theFreeman
For expanding my vocabulary. Thank you, sir.
Oh, I forgot to mention that I'm a hunter. Therefore I happened to notice this:
Excellent. Is this a recent change?The Rulez said:
Not really. Several GM's (but certainly not all) have used it before.
It sort of makes you immortal. Baddies will not hunt you and goodies will not lynch you. And that's the reason I don't like this trait (in it's current form).
However, because there is a 50% chance that you are a baddie with the hunter trait, I personally think it makes sense to lynch you tomorrow.
In a normal game 1/3 of the players are baddie. So the chances of lynching a goodie on the first day are great.
But with the hunters divided quite equally (nowadays) between goodies and baddies it makes sense to lynch you.
Then we have a 50% chance of lynching a goodie.
I like those odds, so you will have my vote tomorrow
And if I get hunted tonight, it makes even more sense if the village will lynch you tomorrow
If you take my word at face value that I'm a hunter, will you also unquestionably accept the following statement?
My role is villager.
So that's that cleared up. No point in lynching me
My role is villager.
So that's that cleared up. No point in lynching me
Not really. Several GM's (but certainly not all) have used it before.
It sort of makes you immortal. Baddies will not hunt you and goodies will not lynch you. And that's the reason I don't like this trait (in it's current form).
However, because there is a 50% chance that you are a baddie with the hunter trait, I personally think it makes sense to lynch you tomorrow.
In a normal game 1/3 of the players are baddie. So the chances of lynching a goodie on the first day are great.
But with the hunters divided quite equally (nowadays) between goodies and baddies it makes sense to lynch you.
Then we have a 50% chance of lynching a goodie.
I like those odds, so you will have my vote tomorrow
And if I get hunted tonight, it makes even more sense if the village will lynch you tomorrow
And you know all this how exactly? How could you possibly know that Hunters are evenly divided between baddies and goodies?
I don't know that for sure. But recent games showed that was the case. Also other games GM-ed by EURO.
Although I agree it's no 100% guarantee.
Wait...
Assuming you're right about the 50% chance, you could lynch me to very slightly increase your chances of killing a wolf, and if I am one, then well played and the village has made a modest gain.
However, if I'm a goodie hunter then the future JL will have lost a potentially massive asset to their side, the dream JL spokesperson. And of course come endgame, if I haven't been hunted, I could whip out my .44 Magnum if need be to smite the last wolf in bloody victory (that was a bit of a tangent, but my point still stands...scan me!). From a neutral standpoint I would argue (well, obviously not entirely neutral) the benefits of keeping me alive until scanned outweigh the possible gains of lynching me. Obviously with my knowledge that I'm a goodie I know it's a very bad idea.
*I'm not sure about hunters being split equally between good and evil in this game; I'll take your word for it that that's the recent trend, but in my experience the vast majority of hunters were goodies, even though the GM's generally claimed that there could be several baddie hunters (in order not to make hunters unlynchable) they were usually mostly villagers, and I think that's best in terms of a good game. Hunter wolves or cultists don't seem to add as much to the game as a villager hunter. But I digress, there's no way of knowing for this game, but I think you're making a dangerously large assumption here, regardless of recent trends.
Ah, day 1 and already OY and AVN have both fixed their sights on getting me killed, whereas as far as I'm aware no one else can claim to have made even one mortal enemy! It's good to be back.
Surely if I'm so powerful, and thus very useful to the village if I'm good, would it not make more sense to scan me?
Assuming you're right about the 50% chance, you could lynch me to very slightly increase your chances of killing a wolf, and if I am one, then well played and the village has made a modest gain.
However, if I'm a goodie hunter then the future JL will have lost a potentially massive asset to their side, the dream JL spokesperson. And of course come endgame, if I haven't been hunted, I could whip out my .44 Magnum if need be to smite the last wolf in bloody victory (that was a bit of a tangent, but my point still stands...scan me!). From a neutral standpoint I would argue (well, obviously not entirely neutral) the benefits of keeping me alive until scanned outweigh the possible gains of lynching me. Obviously with my knowledge that I'm a goodie I know it's a very bad idea.
*I'm not sure about hunters being split equally between good and evil in this game; I'll take your word for it that that's the recent trend, but in my experience the vast majority of hunters were goodies, even though the GM's generally claimed that there could be several baddie hunters (in order not to make hunters unlynchable) they were usually mostly villagers, and I think that's best in terms of a good game. Hunter wolves or cultists don't seem to add as much to the game as a villager hunter. But I digress, there's no way of knowing for this game, but I think you're making a dangerously large assumption here, regardless of recent trends.
You completely accept one claim, then use it as evidence to try and get me killed on the first day. Yet you flatly reject another, equally likely (in fact more likely, much more likely) claim that says its a bad idea to lynch me. Curious.AVN said:
Ah, day 1 and already OY and AVN have both fixed their sights on getting me killed, whereas as far as I'm aware no one else can claim to have made even one mortal enemy! It's good to be back.
Where is the hotel? I don't see any buildings....except that strip club over there. That doesn't look like a hotel at all...there are supposed to be hotels! And why am I not getting any cell phone service? This place sucks.
