Read the post, read the past posts. Find the wolf. You'll understand soon enough.
Actually neither votes were random. And who are you guys trying to defend here?
Seems interesting, no?
I reckon y'all piled up on good ole Ike only cause he's a villager. Besides we gain more information by lynching one of y'all instead of ole Ike here anyway by seeing who's on the bandwagon.
Vote Cliges for your Souls
What's with the red font?
You're no EURO.
UNVOTE JACKSON
VOTE BENTLEY
Usually an outing. But right now Bentley is just being dramatic.
Alright, time for a change. Let's check everyone who has votes so far.
@JCan In the hypothetical scenario that I were to claim OEO villager, would you vote to lynch me?![]()
The Rules said:One Eye Open:
If the One Eye Open is attacked by wolves, hunter or assassin at night he has a 50% chance (not caught asleep/off guard) of killing one of his attackers before succumbing to the attack. He does not know he is One Eye Open.
VOTE AZIS
I like Wagner quite a lot too; I just wasn't sure you meant E_L. I almost noted it as an E_L vote, but then realised that E_T isn't a common E_L nickname and you could theoretically mean somebody else. Though now you have said it was on him, so I have noted it as such---no need to be unreasonable as a GM after all.Alas - my apologies for looking down upon your favourite composer, but you can either take my vote for Eternally Lost or be an even more hack GM and pretend you didn't know who I meant![]()
He was a really good conductor; a shame he so suddenly died.If I die I think this theme could be appropiate (with a danish orchestra)
Don't edit your vote---ever. I don't know what that vote was on previously, but I have noted it as on DNC so that is what it is on now. And remember not to edit vote posts!Well, its time to vote, I guess. As there is no evidence as of yet, aside from the brutal killing of Yakman the sorc, there is little reason to lynch anyone. Yet we do it, for the act of lynching and hunting brings on new evidence.
However, we must remember that most hunts, even those apparently random, are usually not so. Yakman may of been numerically linked in some way, perhaps his sign up number was twice that of a wolf. To link it, however, would be near impossible, as the number of numerical links stretch towards infinity, not to mention that it is likely only a slight correlation, and by no means definite in any sense.
I've therefore endeavored to be truly random in my vote, as there is no reason to pick anyone other than for data, it would be cruel to pick someone based on a quality that they have.
Vote DeathNoteForCutie
Is she new by the way? I don't think I've seen her before.
Night 1 is the proper term!usually Night 0; sometimes called Night 1 by heretics
Why are you boycotting the big due to the lite?so I have temporarily boycotted the game last night in protest.
Why are you boycotting the big due to the lite?
I asked you a question. Moreover, your random vote is as bad as Cliges'.
OOC: We did win that game, despite you not contributing other than counting for parity. We actually only asked two things of you, contact the sorc and leaderlynch us to victory, you did neither.I went through my last 10 games.
I won 2 (although 1 had only 14 players, so that isn't a good example)
Got to the last day on one as a baddie
Hunted Night 0 twice (BOTH TIMES AS EVIL)
Lynched Day 1 twice (BOTH TIMES AS VILLAGER)
Hunted Night 2 once
Lynched Day 2 once
Lynched Day 3 once
It's kinda BS to hunt someone on night 0 when there are a dozen guys who made it to the last day on the previous game. 4/10 games I was targeted and killed because of "reasons"?
and if I recall correctly, we won that game you mentioned.
I don't mean to be a cry baby, but I was really excited about this game and getting offed, yet again, super early, is seriously not cool.
Oh. And yours isn't my dear Marshall?
You claim to be voting Ike just to feel the sweet, sweet steel axe of that brutalise upon you, but we all know Mr. Marshall that you aren't a big enough man to want to die.
Consider it this way, I put forth a poor vote on day one, you put forth a dishonest vote, which one of us looks the worse Mr. Marshall?
Oh and in regards to your question, Sir Marshall, I intend to rid us of the wolves and save the village. If you think me inactive because I refuse to participate in the little pedestrian petty chit chat that's been going on, then yes I'll be inactive. If you think me inactive because I don't throw votes on candidates for the hell of it, then yes I'll be inactive. If you think me inactive because I'm not saying much when I don't have much to say, then perhaps I'm not the problem here.
If you want me to talk more on the basis that everyone should fill a talking quota, then don't be surprised when you don't end up getting any more actual content from me.
But I'll humour you anyway, here's Hazbot's complete rundown of the game up until so far, featuring, the blindingly obvious!
Our little dead darling Yakman's managed to get the short end when the wolves drew their sticks to see who gets hunted first, obviously not the result of any kind of intentional thinking on the wolves' part, there's not much more to say other than "Sucks to be him!"
Despite harping on me for making a stupid lazy vote, the day opens with some stupid, lazy votes, one of which made by the accuser himself too! Except that one is completely different from what I did, that one has not even a shred of any kind of justification coming along with me! Marshall really did open my eyes and show me how to play! He taught me that voting a random person is less lazy that voting someone who votes randomly! This of course means that I can at any time claim that my vote was random, and therefore completely justified and not lazy!
Oh wait, no. Marshall just doesn't have any sort of functioning internal consistency chip. Who would've thought?
There proceeds to be banter between some of the players. It isn't related to the game, but gives off the illusion that you've contributed more to the game than you actually have. Case in point, if we take away the random banter, all Marshall has done was making two lazy votes and berating someone else for lazy voting. Silly me, I should have probably posted some comment about how I like Nancarrow or something. That would've meant I was being active and useful!
We continue with people shouting at eachother and BS voting over banter, but it's totally justified, because they're voting ironically, which everyone knows is a more valid basis for vote than just an easy target.
The next four or five pages continue to have little to no actual content in terms of werewolf, but a lot of banter and joke votes on eachother because that's how you play serious Werewolf! Next time I'll be sure to vote those who post Taylor Swift, because they are more likely to be wolves, and the votes on them are contributing greatly to the success of the village!
Then, Marshall calls me out for inactivity based on the fact that I didn't vote T-Swizzle and that I didn't feel like chatting about Vivaldi's Seasons, and then berates me for putting forth a non-joke vote.
Clearly it is I, I, who is playing the game wrong! Well well, Mr. Marshall, if you want to go that way, fine!
I disagree with you on Wagner being better than Chopin!
UNVOTE CLIGES
VOTE MARSHALL
There! You taught me well Mr. Marshall! You taught me that this is the way to vote! You taught me that the best kind of activity in game is superficial and to force myself in on conversations I may not well fully want or be able to talk about for great length! You taught me pain, anger and confusion! And now Mr. Marshall, wouldn't you like to see the results of your teachings Mr. Marshall?
I swear Marshall, if I ever you see out on the street, I'll give you a very nasty look that will mildly upset you but that you won't be able to do anything about because it isn't a punishable offence!
kinda hard to do anything when you die so early...OOC: We did win that game, despite you not contributing other than counting for parity. We actually only asked two things of you, contact the sorc and leaderlynch us to victory, you did neither.
My point is that if you've recently not actively been helping your side and just been doing the 'loose canon/village idiot' thing you do, then people won't feel bad hunting you because of indifference.
That's why I wondered what you've done recently, in terms of reaching out, manipulating, playing, plotting, etc. What is fair is after all subjective and people will rather take their own perspective on recent games over yours.