There's a reason I read every other word of most posts.That was the reason I said it is a 'BAD EXAMPLE'.
Joho was an emotion filled vote that I quickly realized was bad. Naut didn't help in the slightest in lynching Kai and it hurts my brains that people think he did. You are looking past my case on Cheiron even though he fits very well with the yellows. I'm sorry to inform you that voting has more than just voting records, but that's how the game is played.I think there is a decent case against Luftwafer, however I don't like the current bandwagon on him. So I like to find another candidate to run up with him. Preferably one with a bad voting record.
JCan and Chieron have both one vote at the moment. Of them JCan has a terrible vote record with going after confirmed goodies and an unknown. So yes he qualifies.
Chieron helped in lynching Delta with a significant vote and voted against Kaisensohaib. That looks like he's a goodie.
Then I also had a look at the other candidates Jacksonian Missionary proposes with his analysis.
He voted today first for Johho and then for Nautilu.
Johho helped in lynching a wolf of both packs. Nautilu voted for Delta and help in the lynching of Kaisensohaib. Both are more likely goodie than baddie.
So Jacksonian is proposing candidates which are more likely goodie than baddie. Why ? Is he trying to lead the village in the wrong direction with bad analysis ?
I certainly have the feeling he's doing that and the only reason for such behaviour is that he's a baddie.
Vote Jacksonian Missionary
If I see multiple candidates I like, then yes I'm going to go for a tie. Terrible logic.Jumping from case to case, going for a tie this early
I'm putting in effort, I don't know what else you want me to do besides making my cases and voting. Unless you really wanted me to run up Togee and Euro.More on topic; Jackson has spent this game calling everyone idiots, after the fact, without putting in any relevant effort himself. That's of course highly suspicious, but since he has a lot of recent wolf games to analyse, I'd like to look at those first before voting.
Lazy? That's absurd. I looked at your vote history and saw you made a throwaway on a red and that you are unlikely a yellow with voting Kai. That one vote looks more like an alibi vote than anything.The behavior of Jacksonian is more suspesious. His vote on me clearly reeks of lazy research on my voting history. The question is why. Was he just being lazy and hoping to get away a vote on someone or was that a plot to drive attention away.
I will also say that is very common that wolves will vote their packmates who aren't in danger on day 1 for alibi votes later on, which is a good part of my vote Cheiron that AVN seems to have ignored.
I will give you that it wasn't a throwaway, but you get no goodie points for voting him and then failing to kill him.Jacksonian a throw away vote is a vote for a candidate that has no chance of being lynched. I put two viable wolf candidates on the board early on and I am damn proud of this.
You are aware you are in the wrong thread? ^^You guys are aware we have day 1 and this is just shm voting?
Must have misclicked from the subscriptions page. Well I'm an idiot then.You are aware you are in the wrong thread? ^^