Wonderful. Looks like a few people are in need of berating for stupidity, starting with my brother and progressing to any number of others.
Time for a reread/recap.
Yakman and Rovsea jump out to an early lead, the former for celebrating the previous day's events, and the latter for something connected to posting in thread and the hunt, if I read it correctly. Yakman being Yakman, I'd be more surprised if he didn't do anything that people thought suspicious, so no real comment there. I'm still not sure I completely follow the Rovsea case, but the fact that it didn't remain a simple two-horse race alone makes it worthy of note. Wombat is quickly made a third candidate, with Jerman and Wagonlitz providing key votes to bring him to the top. No other candidates than these three ever really gain serious steam, and Hazbot pushes Wombat into a three way tie. Rovsea puts wombat up by one, and he then proceeds to out himself as a baddie, which pretty much ends all meaningful discussion on the day and makes his death a slam dunk.
If I had a horse in the race I'd be pushing up a second villager, not pushing one villager far enough out that there might be a backlash.
Duly noted. Also unprovable either way, but fine.
Well, damn, no one took the bait. Figured i was dead anyway, and decided to take a wolf or 2 down with me one contacting me (and failed). Ill-conceived, i suppose, but I'm still a newb who likes to test out new strategies, and like I said earlier, at least no important villagers were/will be harmed (as I am just a lowly villager). Maybe there's already inter-pack communication? Either that, vet pack, I just wasn't convincing enough, or the leaders of the packs were offline... Oh well. Good luck, village, and sorry my gambit failed.
For future reference, this is an incredibly stupid idea. Self-outings are pretty high up on the list of suicidal actions. You should have known better.
Even as a villager, it was pretty obvious you were faking it, since you weren't in that much trouble, and the rules for this game leave two unattached baddies at most. Maybe more with apprentices. Clearly not worth it to do as a baddie, hence it was obvious bait. Now lets see who's the closest after these idiots drove you up. Rovsea?
Unvote Jerman Vote Rovsea
With both Jacksonian and Madchemist voting Deathbywombat when they should both know him well enough and be experienced enough to recognize a baiting attempt, I think malicious intent might be involved with at least one of them. K-59 doesn't look so good either. I know madchemist has stated he's busy, but taking Deathbywombat's post at face value would be an example of pure laziness on the part of a villager, which might be possible, if not for it being his own brother. I think madchemist was taking an easy way to remove a potential threat.
Vote Madchemist
Are you just being stupid here, or are you explaining your pack's reasoning for not contacting him and then trying to use that against me?
Looking back, wombat's move makes precisely zero sense regardless of his role. As a villager, it's a fool's hope to expect that a wolf will contact you based on a self-outing; as a wolf, you might at least have the (pretty much equally stupid) notion that you might be helping your pack by the possibility of getting the sorc(s) in contact with your packmates by your death. Either way, I didn't take any real look beyond seeing a self-outing and reacting accordingly, mostly because I didn't have time for anything more. That said, I don't know what I'd have thought if I had had more time to think about it; it wasn't a sensible move either way, and I expect better from wombat as villager or wolf.
As for the eliminating a threat nonsense, that's such an obtuse line of reasoning that it hardly merits a reply. For one thing, my vote was hardly necessary to kill him, and for another, wombat doesn't exactly have much of a track record of getting me lynched (though he is quite fond of hunting me when he's a wolf).
You can't really be suggesting we should have just ignored someone saying they are a wolf.
Precisely this.
It isn't new though, it's been done before, which is why players like Madchemist and K-59 should have recognized it for what it was, a baiting attempt.
It's been done before by baddies as well. I know marty's tried it at least once, and I think Sleepyhead's done it as well. When done by a baddie, it's usually followed up by some sort of claim that they had successfully fished somebody.
Good attempt
@deathbywombat , even though it didn't work. It's always nice when people try new strats.
I agree and we need new candidates anyway. Madchemist did trigger my radar yesterday so I will be doing a full analysis later, but in the meanwhile;
Vote Madchemist
I did say I'm going to do analysis later and so I will. Nothing wrong with a placeholder vote and I'm definitely not going to say "this is a good case but I won't vote accordingly" à la Ironhide.
So you've made an accusation with nothing to back it up and are promising "future analysis" which you have yet to deliver on. If you're able to post, make the analysis. At least aedan's trying to put something together, even if his case is completely wrong.
Vote Marshall
That analysis had better be good, because until I see it, you've got my vote.
As for other viable candidates, I'm particularly interested in those that pushed wombat to the lead prior to the self-outing. Rovsea stands out especially to me, what with a couple key votes pushing another player (now a known villager) into contention while Rovsea was in the lead, and his vote late in the day despite having several posts already prior to that point. I rank Hazbot, Wagon, and Kiwi as plausible connections to Rovsea if he turns up evil.