Werewolf CLXXXI: The Rise of the Werepenguin

[Wagonlitz]

Wagonlitz not sure i get you
i didnt edit the vote, i didnt want to double post so i edited post and added vote
i know that Editing vote out(Not in) is stupid because it doesnt provide the info in tihs game.

As Kiwi mentioned people checking the thread frequently will miss it. And the other things he mentions are really bad too.
So both editing votes in and out are highly frowned upon and it isn't unheard of that editing a vote in or out can lead to you getting lynched. Especially if it happens close to deadline.
Editing things in in general are bad, since people checking the thread frequently will miss it. And editing things into vote posts should never happen, since you cannot be sure that it isn't the vote which have been edited.
So better to make multiple posts in a row. It isn't unheard of to make 5 posts in a row and nobody will critisise you no matter how many posts in a row you make.

 

[CaesarCzech]

As Kiwi mentioned people checking the thread frequently will miss it. And the other things he mentions are really bad too.
So both editing votes in and out are highly frowned upon and it isn't unheard of that editing a vote in or out can lead to you getting lynched. Especially if it happens close to deadline.
Editing things in in general are bad, since people checking the thread frequently will miss it. And editing things into vote posts should never happen, since you cannot be sure that it isn't the vote which have been edited.
So better to make multiple posts in a row. It isn't unheard of to make 5 posts in a row and nobody will critisise you no matter how many posts in a row you make.

So the usual double post triple post etc restrictions doesnt aply ? ok

 

[Wagonlitz]

So the usual double post triple post etc restrictions doesnt aply ? ok

Indeed.

 

[Hax]

Ze Werepenguin

Night 1
Mder1, guardian council villager is hunted


Day 1
Sand3r205, the cursed guardian council villager is lynched
Comm Cody, the brutal werewolf of the Black Pack is lynched
tonkatoy5, the villager is brutalised by Comm Cody
Night 2
Yakman, the villager is hunted


Day 2
Thandros, the spy villager is lynched
Cymsdale, the spy hunter villager is shot by Tornadoli
Night 3
k-59, the villager is hunted​

 

[Capt. Kiwi]

It isn't unheard of to make 5 posts in a row and nobody will critisise you no matter how many posts in a row you make.

Not like you to exaggerate

Five posts that contribute something will not be frowned upon. No need to post repeatedly to find out what the forum clock is set to though

 

[Tornadoli]

torna whyyyyy???

vote tornadoli

I have already explained myself before. Here is the post reproduced for your convenience:

Just to make it clear to the newer players, as the wording in the update is a bit ambigious: I'm a hunter, not a wolf.

The order I sent to the GM was to shoot the player with the highest number of votes who wasn't lynched.

The reason I did this is because I didn't want to waste my ability by dying early (eg. by being hunted). I thought that using it as I did was the best possible way: someone might save the second most voted player, and by surprisingly shooting him, I could have given a lot of info if eg. thandros was a goodie and cyms had turned out to be a baddie.

So, to reiterate: I didn't order to shoot Cymsdale, I ordered to shoot the player with the most votes who didn't get lynched. When you vote someone, that means you want them killed. Voting someone, then crying big crocodile tears when he does get lynched (as I shot him) is a bit strange. If you guys believed his claims about being an important goodie (which, in my opinion, could just as well have been said by a baddie), why didn't you move your vote off him?

Having said that, I do not think I am a good lynch. In fact, I believe to be an easy scapegoat for the baddies.
I do think that Rovsea is a good candidate because of what Cymsdale said (although, I remember from a previous game, spy reports are anything but conclusive or clear). I do not want to bandwagon him though, and therefore want to propose a new candidate.

Someone who, in my opinion, sticks out is Ironhead. He has done almost nothing in the game; the only 2 game related posts before his last one are these:

Pointless votes, without having given any reason. Then today, he just latches onto me as if I am the obvious and clear candidate, without considering any other possibilities. It just seems non-Ironhead-eque.

Vote Ironhead5

I don't think I'm a good candidate. I don't think rovsea is a good candidate. Both of us have been run up before; running us up again makes no strategic sense. There will be no new info gained, and that's what the baddies want. In fact, I guarantee it that there are at least a few wolves hiding in the bandwagons on me and rovsea. Why? Because they don't need any reason to vote us, anything goes (as can be seen in the votes on us - most are given without a reason).

Now, who do I think are good candidates.

I agree that jonti and EURO are oddly inactive and could be baddies. I would also add Ironhead to that list. However, I don't think they are good candidates to lynch today - they are very likely early seer targets.

Onto others. I have mentioned this before, but does no one else think this is suspicious:

He's an easy canidate. I personally think we should go after Jonti or Euro, since neither have been very talkative or helpful.

Jonti is an excellent option too.

Dadarian just completely omitting EURO? He is also acting odd in general.

I would also like to put attention on delta. He keeps posting stuff like this:

Aren't camels supposed to have fur? Why is this camel so slippery?

vote rovsea

I don't know, random RP votes are ok on Day 1, but he keeps doing it.

Dadarian and delta keep avoiding any significant attention, I think they'd be good candidates to run up today.

 

[Wagonlitz]

Not like you to exaggerate

Five posts that contribute something will not be frowned upon. No need to post repeatedly to find out what the forum clock is set to though

I actually considered saying that 7 posts in a row wasn't a problem since I know I---and I think Aziz too---once made 7 posts in a row, but I think 5 in a row is way more frequent.


By the way I cannot remember if I answered you on this: Yes both of the dead council members were stated as council members all the time.

 

[Dadarian]

Dadarian just completely omitting EURO? He is also acting odd in general.

I told you, I dislike jonti and would rather run him up. I like Euro and rather run up jonti.

It's fairly standard playing style by me.

 

[marty99]

I'm pretty sure 5 posts in a row, even contributory ones, should be frowned upon. Definitely something to strive to avoid. Two, three at a stretch is fine.

 

[Wagonlitz]

Dadarian just completely omitting EURO? He is also acting odd in general.

I would also like to put attention on delta. He keeps posting stuff like this:



I don't know, random RP votes are ok on Day 1, but he keeps doing it.

Dadarian and delta keep avoiding any significant attention, I think they'd be good candidates to run up today.

Very good point on Dadarian. Could it be similar to the thing dex did in a lite some time ago? I propose lynching Dadarian, because if he is a wolf then EURO almost certainly is too.
delta is good too, but I would prefer Dadarian due to the above.

Unvote jonti
Vote Dadarian

 

[Delta21]

I don't know, random RP votes are ok on Day 1, but he keeps doing it.

Dadarian and delta keep avoiding any significant attention, I think they'd be good candidates to run up today.

Fair point. The camel has been defended well (by itself and by others).

unvote rovsea

vote Delta21

but if he DOES turn out to be an evil one, I'll be the one saying "I told you so".

 

[Hax]

Delta21, stop editing your vote posts.

 

[The Super Pope]

Delta21, stop editing your vote posts.

Does the new forum actually say if a post is edited?

 

[Rovsea]

Fair point. The camel has been defended well (by itself and by others).

unvote rovsea

vote Delta21

but if he DOES turn out to be an evil one, I'll the one saying "I told you so".

Voting oneself is self-destructive, breaks up village collaboration, and is generally frowned upon.

 

[Rovsea]

Does the new forum actually say if a post is edited?

Yes, although I believe it still has the small window where one may edit without a time stamp appearing.

EDIT: See?

EDIT: And now there should be a timestamp.

 

[Dadarian]

Very good point on Dadarian. Could it be similar to the thing dex did in a lite some time ago? I propose lynching Dadarian, because if he is a wolf then EURO almost certainly is too.
delta is good too, but I would prefer Dadarian due to the above.

Unvote jonti
Vote Dadarian

Not really. Vote EURO if you want, there is nothing for him imo other than my opinion for him. I can tell you quite confidently I'm not a baddie.

 

[Delta21]

Delta21, stop editing your vote posts.

I'm trying so hard, but I keep failing

quite confidently

only quite? quite is not good enough. We need your full confidence on this one.

 

[The Super Pope]

Yes, although I believe it still has the small window where one may edit without a time stamp appearing.

EDIT: See?

I must be being an idiot, but i can't see anything to show that you edited other than yourself writing it

 

[Delta21]

I must be being an idiot, but i can't see anything to show that you edited other than yourself writing it

Check the right-hand side near the +Quote and Reply buttons. It says "Last edited X time ago"

 

[Delta21]

unvote Delta

vote EURO