oh yeah what i meant was 'or if not the note is a false claim by a baddie'
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Or the player who sent me the note reveals themselves to me, euro or somebody else they think they can trust.
Have you seen any restless baddies so far?
I saw three restless goodies.
well we've only seen one baddie at all so far
out of ten goodies 3 restless
out of one baddie no restless
dont think its enough information to say theres no baddies that are restless
thats irrelevant as euro was seer scanned anyway. the only time euro could be a baddie is from being turned that one night.
If I am going to spy on one, and hope that I get lucky, who should it be? I'm thinking EURO, because he's the one the evidence points to and nobody really suspects randy of anything. Objections? Suggestions?
Permit me to answer your question with one or two of my own.
Do you think there are baddie leaders? Do you think there are restless baddies?
If you have answered any of the previous questions with a "yes", then congratulations! You're thinking like I am! Absolutely nobody should be cleared for having any of those traits, and to suggest otherwise is a bit disingenuous, at best.
Maybe? But why expose a baddie leader if that's the intent?
And said absolutely nothing helpful.
Under the circumstances, it would be vastly more suspicious if you weren't.
I think this may be only the second time I've ever seen a successful sorc protection. And in Last Council, once I knew the baddies I was protecting them every chance I could. There's plenty of good reasons why the sorc might be in contact with the baddies by now (e.g. cultist scans, SoL's outing), and so I'm going to assume that anyone the sorc protects is a known baddie in the absence of evidence to the contrary.
I suspect the baddies have that info anyway, whether from you or a packmate of yours.
Pretty sure it's already been established that EURO was a villager as of night 3. The question is whether or not he still is.
Out of curiosity, what night was this?
I think plenty of people suspect randy. I have no objection to either being checked.
Well I guess in a game as large as this, it can be expected that I'll be ignored. To put it succinctly, no Euro is not the one the evidence points to, and randy is very much suspected. Scanning Randy is my infinite preference, since then we'll have a for sure baddie, rather than Euro known as a goodie, which will lead to some people fighting against Randy being lynched and putting blame elsewhere.
I'm pretty Dutch right now, but I am a goodie so trust me.
B.T.W. What happens on this fora, stays on this fora.
You guys suck ones again by lynching CAWS when there is a clear case. I leave deadline for one day and you shit things up again. Thanks for that. Well it seems we have to vote baddies once again. So I'd like to see one of them JhomKjelkem 's sucpicios list to determine which to vote. Well bye I am gonna be Dutch again. Long live gras.
B.T.W. What happens on this fora, stays on this fora.
You guys suck ones again by lynching CAWS when there is a clear case. I leave deadline for one day and you shit things up again. Thanks for that. Well it seems we have to vote baddies once again. So I'd like to see one of them JhomKjelkem 's sucpicios list to determine which to vote. Well bye I am gonna be Dutch again. Long live gras.
I would never ignore you, aedan. :wub:
So what is the suspicion against randy based upon?
What? You're Dutch? Okay?
If anyone needs to be scanned right now, it would be Randy.
Euro could have been turned, but also could every other cursed player, or maybe the baddies hit a GA protected person.
Euro could have been turned, but also could every other cursed player, or maybe the baddies hit a GA protected person.
I worked the night shift last night, and was asleep until about 4 minutes before the deadline. I started reading the thread, thought Euro had been outed, and skipped out on reading further in order to change my vote from where I thought it was. Then it turned out that a whole bunch of other stuff had happened in the intervening pages. All the noblest of intentions there, on my oath of honour and pinky swear.
For trying to lynch Euro when the evidence points to Randy as the leak. Your reason for trusting Randy came after this post, but still changes little. You have only Randy's word that someone else, who he didn't name, cleared him. That's almost the same as saying "Yeah I'm cleared, believe me." Trusting him so easily is poor play in my view.