Werewolf CLXXIV: Trouble on The Stockholm

[Adamus]

vote kaiser

 

[Yakman]

Revenge vote, rather. Placing me ahead as well.

Tell us instead why you think you and EL are rivals, and he was cursed.

b/c E-L and I were rivals.

wolves going for the easy Yak-lynch is an old, tired, and broken record.

woof!

 

[GreatUberGeek]

As has been pointed out Sedracus was adamant in shooting EURO; i.e. EURO would be shot---not lynched.

Way to not read the thread, man!

[face palm]
Ah well. That line of inquiry is pretty much dead at this point. I'm not entirely sure where to go from this point. But I'll Vote Rovsea for some flip-flopping between candidates and not the best candidates in the first place.

 

[Sleepyhead]

b/c E-L and I were rivals.

wolves going for the easy Yak-lynch is an old, tired, and broken record.

woof!

That's a fact yes, but I'm wondering why you were paired with a cursed player with no protection.

 

[Gen. Skobelev]

Vote Sedracus

Any particular reason?

I would rather not vote Sleepyhead for noticing what could be an easy way for cultists to attach even if like someone said his actions would work both for goodies, EURO pack members and other pack members (but not really for unattached cultists). Just because he isn't any more clear than the rest of us, why vote him?

Agreed. While it's good to remember it doesn't clear him, it won't incriminate him either. If anything, it's more likely point in his favour as he's somewhat less likely packmate.

Hmmm, actually, upon further evaluation, my Sedracus vote could be changed to something better.

Unvote Sedracus, Vote Sleepyhead

Quick switch - any particular reason for Sleepyhead? Seems like you are bouncing from player to player without too much thought.

Why?

Noone is cleared at the moment. However Sedracus was willing to shoot a wolf and he was willing to voluntarily reveal himself. If he was a wolf he'd just keep quiet about it. You want to lynch him. Then you go about changing to lynch Sleepy, who made the comment about cultists attaching. Which he had no obligation to do.

There are other bad lynches; for example the same goes for DutchGuy (who outed Euro) or Wagon, who was bandwagoned by Euro.

Does that clear any of the 4 of them fully? Of course it doesn't. However it doesn't make them a good lynch compared to complete unkowns like yourself for example? The fact that you do not take these into consideration and have chosen two of these candidates, marks that you are either not interested or would like these players gone without any explanation. Neither of which is what the village needs now.

This. Those players have something at least that speaks for them (if not that loudly in every case) so slightly less likely baddies on that account.

COUNTER VOTE!

clearly a wolf looking for an easy lynch. it's tired, and I'm over it.

vote sleepyhead

Yakman being himself, I see. Revenge vote ain't too nice to do.

No, Hax, it was the 40 or so pms you sent me last game.


Look, if you guys are going to be retarded about this all game, you may as well lynch me now so I can sub back in. Do it now or else do it never.

You got to admit, Hax has it perfected. First he spams inbox full, then denounces them as wolf with full inbox.

Anyways, it's very start of the game (almost). Why should one vote immediately mean that you will be lynched?

Hmm. Like Ese pointed out, Euro posted in large red letters that he was a wolf. On that same page, people continued to vote E_L. In a rare moment of clarity, Bro seemed to be the only guy to notice it. Not sure who to vote right now, but I'd like a simple explanation from those people.

Have you even read the thread? There was extensive discussion about that.

Vote Madchemist

Since he's voting villagers since 1984.

...so, it's random vote?

I haven't accused him.

Doh.

Spoiler

I don't? I honestly can't see the big change in my playstyle, and no I am not loud, the only game I was loud in was I think the game I decided to be active, but from that day I usually post at a normal rate starting from Day 2, which I think I mentioned more than once already.

Yes, but until the day 2 (or often longer) you really are very quiet and invisible. No wonder it gets pointed out, especially as the contrast between that and your more hectic moments is so huge.

Funny, he isn't even mentioned in your earlier post. Why is he suspicious?

Actually now that you said it couldn't from the top of my head say what exacly it was. So I went back and checked: the discussion from here onwards - it's about the Ironhead fishing scheme and his reaction to that. Not much, granted, but good enough for "day 1 vote".

Well, at least you're talking now.

Unvote Kaisersohaib
Vote Dexander

He isn't, however.

Yeah, at least sometimes threatening with noose works in making people talk.

I have no idea.So Vote Kaisersohaib

Surely there must be something else as a reason?

This is usually how I play it too, never really paid much attention to who posts much/little this early in a game before. Only this game so much (hopefully) relevant things went on both day 0 and day 1 so I've actually manage to rank above the middle which I usually only do if I last into the endgame (not to mention the post game where I can go on and on and on...)

I usually notice it if I can't think from the top of my head any suspects, then it's time for that. Or if I do reread and suddenly notice somebody's post and realise "Woah, I didn't even realise he's in the game".

??????????¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿


OK people, can we just appreciate what's going on here, regardless of who he was going to vote, this is absolute idiocy.

Hmm? Why is it absolute idiocy to vote "randomly" (as that's how I read his vote)? Or is it just because it's you he's voting?

vote kaiser

Because...?

[face palm]
Ah well. That line of inquiry is pretty much dead at this point. I'm not entirely sure where to go from this point. But I'll Vote Rovsea for some flip-flopping between candidates and not the best candidates in the first place.

Fair enough. But perhaps in the future you might check the thread before making wild accusations about stuff?

That's a fact yes, but I'm wondering why you were paired with a cursed player with no protection.

Yep, that's the crux of Yakman case. Has Yakman made any other claims than rivalry on a now-dead cursed villager?

 

[Gen. Skobelev]

Kaisersohaib: 4
johho888 [650]
Nautilu [655]
DutchGuy [676]
Adamus [681]

Sleepyhead: 3
Ironhead 5 [634]
Rovsea [649 Sedracus -> 651]
Yakman [656]

Dexander: 2
Kaisersohaib [669]
randakar [674 Sleepyhead -> 674 Kaisersohaib -> 674]

Rovsea: 2
Daffius [654]
GreatUberGeek [683]

alxeu: 1
madchemist [633]

Yakman: 1
Sleepyhead [642]

marty99: 1
esemesas [645]

Adamus: 1
Gen. Skobelev [647]

Ironhead 5: 1
Hax [652]

madchemist: 1
Sand3r205 [665]


not voted: 14
Rysz []
Falc []
Panzer Commader []
Wagonlitz []
happycats517 []
Arkasas []
marty99 []
tamius23 []
Sedracus []
brovahkiin []
Dexander []
alxeu []
al-Aziz []
aedan777 []

 

[Yakman]

That's a fact yes, but I'm wondering why you were paired with a cursed player with no protection.

yawn.

 

[Falc]

VOTE SLEEPYHEAD

Because tie

 

[esemesas]

Unvote marty
Vote Rovsea

I don't really like either of the current front two. I'd rather we kill someone less active.

 

[Wagonlitz]

Vote Rovsea

TIE!

 

[Rendap]

Roll Call - 1h50 Hours left:

Sleepyhead 4 - Ironhead (634), Rovsea (649,651), Yakman (656), Falc (688)
Kaisersohaib 4 - Johho (650), Nautilu (655), DutchGuy (676), Adamus (681)
Rovsea 4 - Daffius (654), GUG (683), Ese (645,689), Wagon (690)
Dexander 2 - Kaisersohaib (669), Randy (674)
Alxeu 1 - Madchemist (633)
Yakman 1 - Sleepy (642)
Adamus 1 - Gen. Skob. (647)
Ironhead 1 - Hax (652)
Madchemist 1 - Sander (665)

Non-Voters: Yes, too many.

 

[happycats517]

Really guys?

Sleepy was a useful player yesterday and Kaiser is being active for today at least.

Vote Dex

If we're going to do CAWZ we might as well do a player who is actually CAWZ worthy.

 

[marty99]

I know it's following hot on the heels of Happycats, but I have to go soon, and my thoughts are quite similar to his.

Vote Dexy's Midnight Runners

There's enough time to the deadline that a four-way tie now is fine. Don't let it stand at deadline.

 

[Ironhead 5]

Sweet virgin mother of EUROO7, you nincompoops. I said NO TIES.

UNVOTE SLEEPYHEAD
VOTE ROVSEA

 

[marty99]

Sweet virgin mother of EUROO7, you nincompoops. I said NO TIES.

UNVOTE SLEEPYHEAD
VOTE ROVSEA

Dude, it's almost two hours to deadline. What is the issue? As long as it doesn't stand at deadline we're fine.

 

[aedan777]

Vote Dexander

Even less active than Rovsea, and has a couple votes.

EDIT: Or he did when I was typing this.

 

[Wagonlitz]

Dude, it's almost two hours to deadline. What is the issue? As long as it doesn't stand at deadline we're fine.

And TIEs before deadline (and sometimes after deadline too) can actually be a good thing, since you can learn much from who break the TIE and in favour of who.

 

[Ironhead 5]

But for heaven's sake, Sleepyhead is the better candidate. Why is no one ridiculing him for this post here?

Tell us instead why you think you and EL are rivals, and he was cursed.

Yes, please Yakman, tell us why you think you were rivals with E_L, and why you think he was cursed. And no, you may not use E_L's own admission, or the GM's update, to demonstrate these facts.

Can we please get some momentum back on Sleepyhead?

 

[Hax]

Sweet virgin mother of EUROO7, you nincompoops. I said NO TIES.

UNVOTE SLEEPYHEAD
VOTE ROVSEA

What is your role metalhead?

 

[Wagonlitz]

But for heaven's sake, Sleepyhead is the better candidate. Why is no one ridiculing him for this post here?



Yes, please Yakman, tell us why you think you were rivals with E_L, and why you think he was cursed. And no, you may not use E_L's own admission, or the GM's update, to demonstrate these facts.

Can we please get some momentum back on Sleepyhead?

As I read that quoted post it is Sleepy asking yakman why the GM rivaled him with a cursed man. I.e. indicating yakman easily could be a baddie.