Jonti-h, how do you know me so well? Have you been spying on me while I was sleeping?
And yes, that was indeed a post made to make it clear that he was getting on my nerves and that he should sod off.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
And yes, that was indeed a post made to make it clear that he was getting on my nerves and that he should sod off.
I'm sure Jonti will love you for that.
I said it one minute before you actually, see, we are meant to be together, as your powers fade away, mine become stronger. I SHALL BE THE NEW SKOBIE
Uh oh...
I never thought people would look up to me in Werewolf
See, voteswitches, from my experience, are taken as a "hesitant wolf" move and not considered as productive activity, making small analysis is much better.
Nope. And it wasn't voteswitch which caused you to get votes. Clearly you missed the argument then.
I suppose and I think I remarked on it. Then again, running same guys up time and again isn't necessarily the best way to go. Oh and by the way, why omit Arkasas from the list?
Well, it could be read like that. Also, like Split says, you do/did protest quite vehemently there. Could be annoyance at your new playstyle being challenged, could be... something else.
No. That started when Randy remarked you sounded like hesitant wolf, I concurred and dug up couple of posts from you in that exact vein and then you started getting votes.
Et tu, Marty? :rofl:
Wait, no philosophical thoughts tonigt?
:laugh:
Um - you might want to realise he was in a guild after all. And goodie on top of that...
Ah, there it is.
Mmyeah. It could be read indeed that he got annoyed when his playstyle change (to the better, I'd like to say) got immediately challenged. Then again, he did protest a bit excessively. *shrug*
What have I fallen for? Being robbed demotes you to basic villager status. But Cymsdale, the person being robbed, apparently didn't know this. He claimed he still has van Helsing.
I highly respect your LOTR lore.
No, but she has a camera in your bathroom.
I write quite some strong posts so that didn't really register, but you could be right.
I dunno what Kai is, but Cyms going for him after he changed his playstyle (after nearly getting lynched, something I was keen to take part in) pissed me off purely from the message it sends out.
For now I'd rather lynch Yakman and someone else instead of returning to the Panda/Kai runners up.
I think he said that DG had been van Helsing but had lost that to robbery Cymsdale did. And the confusion rose when people (myself included) were wondering where the van Helsing went as he's now villager/cultist.
Yeah, sure. I'm not advocating lynching Kaisersohaib today, either. I suppose I was just trying to say I can kind of see both sides of the argument (pissed off vs too defensive). I guess Cymsdale just has a Kaiserohaib fetish in this game, I think quite many players get fixated on another at one point or another.
So, yeah, again, what have I fallen for?
No, he did not say that. He said the exact opposite.
So, he either believed he still had van Helsing, or he was lying in some way.
No real reason. Picked the two that came to mind.
I guess running up new people is a good thing, as long as we keep the names of those previously run up in mind for future days.
Were my posts aggressive to you? I mean they look pretty normal to me, I was told many times that my posts come out as threatening and aggressive, however, it's just how I write, I could still start writing....... softer?
Hmm. I suppose I better reread what was going on back there as I was confused myself about the robbery/trait/van Helsing stuff. You could be onto something there (though I thought so before I reread the rules & got corrected on my assumption).
That's very much true. Something to return to tomorrow, perhaps, after seeing how today goes? Or perhaps scanners can work their wonders there. And fair enough, it'd be too excessive to run simply all candidates from previous day again, it'd be rather superfluous and outright silly.
I have read them. Being robbed makes you lose your roles. But in your post, you were clearly unaware of that. If you got robbed of van Helsing, you would have got told so in your role pm and wouldn't have made that mistake, I would've thought.
Also, I don't think the case on Kaisersohaib was ever particularly strong. I think it's good he's being more active.
That still doesn't qualify as bandwagoning, though.
No, he claimed he found out that his new role used to have that role when he subbed back in...
Kaiser isn't a baddie because he changed his playstyle (which is good, his past playstyle was horrid), he's a baddie because he became super defensive about it.
Randy, listen. He said he thought, and the quote is right there, that robbing doesn't lose roles. If he knew his role had been robbed, why would he say that robbing didn't take away roles? That's all I want to know.
So can I, suppose as I can be fairly aggressive my sympathy tends to go towards him slightly and IIRC I've been on the back end of a Cyms-obsession at some point too.
Fuck this "obsession" bullshit. I noticed a strange change in behavior that I found suspicious yesterday, and I poked him to test it. As a result, I decided to vote for him today because of his reaction.
Well, yeah, he worded it weirdly seeing he should know. Not sure if it's mistype/thought or if it's genuine slipup aka lie. Because, let's face it, quite many players (myself obviously included) are prone to making tons of mistakes in their language.
I believe I said that even when he got run up - then again, I didn't have any better ideas then, either, so less than stellar case was better than no case at all.
Yeah.
It does look a bit obsessive to vote same guy in two different roles.
Yep, that's a good point. Why bring up the van Helsing in the first place since nobody knows about it either way, especially if it's just a lie? I think some wording error is the most likely explanation.
This is however not the first time you are "obsessed" or "fixated" at me, you have wanted me out of Werewolf for a long time and you have been against me in almost every game we were in, so I find that very stupid of you, I normally just ignore you, but this is too much.
[/rant]
(( Seriously though I am sick and tired of this crap, let's move on and find some probable wolves ))