Good question.
It is hypothetical though; you know that I'm sometimes sounding strange to people.
Voting me per se is not wolfish; voting me because you don't have any case is wolfish, since that's an extremely easy vote.
So IRL you get lynched when having made a wrong case? Well that doesn't happen here. You can get lynched for solely making wrong cases, but especially at the start of the game it's expected that most cases are wrong. And hence you don't get lynched just because you made a wrong case.
So you're willing to vote me despite there not really having been shown any evidence against me?
Except I'm not making myself an easy backup lynch. There just are some people who are antagonistic against me and have been it for years and I've no idea why that is. Though perhaps EURO's still pissed about how I voted him in 12 angry men (the one where I was seer and he shot me day 1).Maybe you shouldn't make yourself such an easy backup lynch
Well now I actually kinda feel bad for random-lynching you for meta reasons, but I'd be lying if I said that was the primary reason for my next action.
Might be the language barrier then; in Danish being tempted means you're quite likely to do it.
Why me over Ram or Cliges? Also where have I been casting shade? That I said good question to aedan when he asked why tou removed the jeray PMs?
I don't really have too much of a read on either of them tbh.
Pretty much. Seems like you're latching on.
So saying that a question aedan made, which was sound, is a good question is latching onto casting shade? Also you did give a fine explanation to that question; but that doesn't mean that the question was bad. And why don't you go against aedan for being the one asking the question?
But you think that a vote on me for saying aedan had a good point is a good vote...?
But I wasn't agreeing to a case; I was agreeing to a question aedan asked. A question does not a case make. You're doing your usual tunneling Torn and as usual you're as stubborn as an ass.
