Werewolf CCXII: Fur

[Wagonlitz]

Have you done due diligance, to see why this happened?
Surely someone has his/her/zhe/it/theirs email. We should inquire.

j-L has it.

 

[Wagonlitz]

Interesting.

Steed wolf making a classic videonfan post, not for a seer, but a villager with some traits seems too good to be true.

You are aware that videonfan talked about villagers? The "Oh God, we lost the seer" is what I have jokingly said when I have died as seer.
And I really don't see Steed's comment as videonfanning.

 

[THE_SPLIT]

j-L has it.

Well has he inquired? Was a report produced, lessons learned updated?

 

[Wagonlitz]

Well has he inquired? Was a report produced, lessons learned updated?

You'll have to ask @jacob_Lundgreen whether he has inquired. My guess would be no though. And pretty sure j-L is the only one having it.

Så har du fundet ud af noget Jacob?

 

[Wagonlitz]

@Jacob-lundgreen

 

[Wagonlitz]

@jacob-Lundgren

Bloody tags.

 

[Gen. Marshall]

You are aware that videonfan talked about villagers? The "Oh God, we lost the seer" is what I have jokingly said when I have died as seer.

Yea.

And I really don't see Steed's comment as videonfanning.

Oh it's videonfanning alright. It's so blatantly obvious that I'm in doubt whether it's a legit baddie tell.

Coming to think of it, it's Steed's job to convince us why it isn't.

Unvote EURO
Vote Steed

 

[Jacksonian Missionary]

Some newb called videonfan was a baddie and when a goodie died was all like "oh no, this goodie died " and everyone correctly saw that he was a baddie.
Same thing as what's happening with Steed here. Actually, I won't let him get away with it.

Unvote Spocky
Vote Steed

Mehh, it's a decent day 1 case, but I don't really think it's all that telling. Now if say, he committed multiple baddie tells in one post then I'd be more inclined.

I still don't think spockyt is a wolf for saying that, for as I said before he wouldn't be that bold. I also think it's a set up hunt by the wolves in hopes people would bite at an easy case.

 

[Wagonlitz]

Yea.



Oh it's videonfanning alright. It's so blatantly obvious that I'm in doubt whether it's a legit baddie tell.

Coming to think of it, it's Steed's job to convince us why it isn't.

Unvote EURO
Vote Steed

It isn't really Videonfanning, since firstly it fits RP wise and secondly it isn't the only thing he says in that post.

 

[Cliges]

'Litz, in addition to explaining the ass situation already, this is the second time you've made told us the videofanning saga.

 

[Gen. Marshall]

it fits RP wise

What RP does it supposedly fit?

The more I look at that post, the less reasons I can think of why a villager would say that.

 

[Tornadoli]

And I really don't see Steed's comment as videonfanning.

Please tell me how this post:

Oh No... npstr the Leader hunter Villager has been Murder, Death, Killed.... Sad day indeed.

is not videonfanning, when it is basically exactly the same message that videonfan himself wrote. How can you be so dense? The issue is, like Gen Marshall said, not whether it is videonfanning or not (spoiler: it is), but whether it's legit or e.g. a joke.

 

[Wagonlitz]

'Litz, in addition to explaining the ass situation already, this is the second time you've made told us the videofanning saga.

So I should just not answer people who ask questions already asked earlier in the thread? Since I only explained those things because people asked. That some people didn't read the thread and hence asked already answered questions isn't my fault. You are saying I then just should be unhelpful and not answer said questions?

 

[Wagonlitz]

What RP does it supposedly fit?

How he talked about having his teeth filed down and fur removed.

is not videonfanning, when it is basically exactly the same message that videonfan himself wrote. How can you be so dense? The issue is, like Gen Marshall said, not whether it is videonfanning or not (spoiler: it is), but whether it's legit or e.g. a joke.

You are picking in the post; look at the entire post. Then it isn't really videonfanning. First you have some banter between johho and Steed. And then Steed answering Hax how it felt voting him. The npstr comment is part of that. I really don't see that as suspicious.

Ive been away having my teeth filed down and extensive hair removal, Blend in a treat now



It felt so good, I'm considering voting for you properly..


Oh No... npstr the Leader hunter Villager has been Murder, Death, Killed.... Sad day indeed.

 

[jeray2000]

Unvote Al-Aziz
Vote Rovsea

Let's make the votes today a bit closer. More information that way.

 

[Rovsea]

Baby don't hurt me.

Regarding the whole Spockyt/Rovsea thing. I'm not convinced enough to call anyone wolves based on it, but there are two odd things that have caught my attention. First, that Spockyt brought up voting for Rovsea out of the blue; IIRC Rovsea wasn't the second candidate to win the shamvote, yet Spockyt presents it as a binary choice of voting for either Rovsea or napster. Second, that Rovsea makes a joke about Spockyt's post after Tornadoli called it out as suspicious. Even if Spockyt is just a villager, that's still wolfish behaviour from Rovsea.

Sure, but procedure-ception is actually a good way to get rid of the RNG voters.

I agree with previous posters that this looks suspicious. What exactly seemed so particularly baseless about the early Day 1 run up of LK, Canadian?

Ramius seems to care more whether or not he fits in with the other people, than whether their behaviour is wolfish or not.

As for the trivia thing, I believe it is in the wolves' interest to go off topic in thread and feign activity by posting OT nonsense. Cliges correctly points out that this can be done in the OT Tavern thread, but MC and Aziz insist on doing it in thread. Aziz then actually proceeds with the trivia.

Due to contributing factors, I really don't have a lot of time to play in this thread.

 

[Rovsea]

Mehh, it's a decent day 1 case, but I don't really think it's all that telling. Now if say, he committed multiple baddie tells in one post then I'd be more inclined.

I still don't think spockyt is a wolf for saying that, for as I said before he wouldn't be that bold. I also think it's a set up hunt by the wolves in hopes people would bite at an easy case.

As opposed to your other day 1 cases, filled with multiple baddie tells and obvious wolves. Jackson, what exactly is the point of this post? To show ambiguity towards the Steed case?

Regardless, I can get behind the Steed vote for now. I'm about 50% sure Wagon's defense is just bias, anyways.

Vote Steed

 

[Jacksonian Missionary]

As opposed to your other day 1 cases, filled with multiple baddie tells and obvious wolves. Jackson, what exactly is the point of this post? To show ambiguity towards the Steed case?

I was just giving my thoughts on the matter, I'm sorry my actual game related posts offend you so.

 

[Hax]

Ive been away having my teeth filed down and extensive hair removal, Blend in a treat now

Did you also bleach a certain spot?

It felt so good, I'm considering voting for you properly..

Please don't do that.

Oh No... npstr the Leader hunter Villager has been Murder, Death, Killed.... Sad day indeed.

Hmm.. this is videonfanning, but it feels fake. Like it is not written from the bottom of his heart.

Yes; but it is common courtesy to not cull him day 1 due to him being returning.

What if he was a confirmed baddie?

You don't say... Told you the Dane was evil, almost as evil as the orifice loving marsupial.

What is going on here?
The evil Dane is alive, the Marsupial is still breathing and you guys are doing what - playing Jeopardy???

The Dane is getting away!

Why don't you vote for him then?

Also why is Hax so quiet?

Studying. Circuits and shit.

I'm surprised you don't remember given you were one of the people voting him for it.

Oh come on, you don't need to post all those quotes every time somebody wants an explanation.

 

[Hax]

VOTE Spockyt

I like the case on him. A votecount would be nice to have now.