But then you dno't just take down one a day, since that only benefit the baddies. You take down as many as possible. That is the point in CAWZ.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Let's see about that today, then. I won't break this TIE because I like both candidates.
The point is that you had a big problem with a TIE yesterday despite the lynch being the only weapon of a vanilla villager. Doing TIEs is part of the arsenal of a villager and shouldn't be discounted out of some anti TIE mania. (Just like one shouldn't go full Lem either.)
Yes, TIEs should be practised when the village has a better-than-random suspicion who the baddies might be, and killing more people as a village can be beneficial in that case.
Day 1 is not that case.
You will never get more info on zombies and hence you might as well lynch them all at once if you are to go CAWZ; otherwise you let them be (which indeed is bad if they are let be for too long). You don't ust nibble away one a day.
You will never get more info on zombies and hence you might as well lynch them all at once if you are to go CAWZ; otherwise you let them be (which indeed is bad if they are let be for too long). You don't ust nibble away one a day.
Day 2 Votecount - Final
IronhideG1: 5De Chatillon (638)
aedan777 (647)
JCan (655)
ramius3443 (637 Duke Dan -> Ironhide 699)
johho (729 Gen Marshall -> 730 Ramius3443 -> 735)
Tornadoli: 5
Madchemist (625)
Ironhide (633)
Gen Marshall (589 jeray2000 -> 755)
Capibara (776)
Wagonlitz (691 Gen Marshall -> 778)
Duke Dan "the Man": 3
Borath the Undulator (610)
Health (714)
Spockyt (744)
Gen. Marshall: 2
esemesas (651)
F72 Voyager (695)
Wagonlitz: 2
Tornadoli (592)
Audren (762)
Canadian_95_RTS: 1
Jeray2000 (731)
Health: 1
Jehova (758)
Not Voted: @EUROO7, @Duke Dan "the Man", @Canadian_95_RTS
Any objections?
Last edited:
Day/Night 2 Recap
The day passed relatively quietly, compared to the dreadful storm and fury of yesterday. One seeming Valhallan's indifferent assent to the naming of a potential candidate for death immediately drew the attention of many warriors, who called for his swift execution. Sure enough, he was an invader! A doleful deity, he read the spirits of dead men and dragged them to the underworld. Now he was to face the fate he had presided over for so many.
But another was added to the count at the last second. And there was wailing in Valhalla when they examined the body, as this was no ordinary Norse warrior; this was a Valkyrie, sent to guard and heal the broken warriors of Valhalla. But what is healing power against the unchecked rage of men and gods?
A quiet night passed. What would happen in the days to come?
IronhideG1, AKA Hades, of the Olympus Pack, has been lynched.
Tornadoli, the Valkyrie, has been lynched.
No hunt occurs during the night.
Well then.
I think we can all agree that EURO is to blame for this.
Also, @deathbywombat, you have Hazbot as having not voted, but there's the slight issue that he's dead, according to page 1.
I think we can all agree that EURO is to blame for this.
Also, @deathbywombat, you have Hazbot as having not voted, but there's the slight issue that he's dead, according to page 1.
Here is a cursory anlysis
Tornadoli was NOT just covering his woflieness: he was completely innocent. The last minute lynch against him was a serious mistake.
Wagonlitz been suspicious from the beginning due to unusual behavior in the sham vote and a total lack of game-related activity until he was called out for it shortly before the end of day 1. The man who brought the case against him initially, Rosvea, was killed that night. Day 2 Wagonlitz peddled several unconvincing and at one point downright inconsistant arguments ("We shouldn't be lynching random zombies, but we should lynch multiple zombies"). However, untill that point he had been arguing for several pages that we shouldn't just be executing zombies, and should focus on someone else. He than cast the deciding vote to kill Tornadoli, whose case consisted of a half hearted defense and notable inactivity. He also seems to be the only one online that still believes the case against Marshal was anything more than a clerical error.
Now I could be wrong: but things are starting to add up.
VOTE WAGONLITZ
Tornadoli was NOT just covering his woflieness: he was completely innocent. The last minute lynch against him was a serious mistake.
Wagonlitz been suspicious from the beginning due to unusual behavior in the sham vote and a total lack of game-related activity until he was called out for it shortly before the end of day 1. The man who brought the case against him initially, Rosvea, was killed that night. Day 2 Wagonlitz peddled several unconvincing and at one point downright inconsistant arguments ("We shouldn't be lynching random zombies, but we should lynch multiple zombies"). However, untill that point he had been arguing for several pages that we shouldn't just be executing zombies, and should focus on someone else. He than cast the deciding vote to kill Tornadoli, whose case consisted of a half hearted defense and notable inactivity. He also seems to be the only one online that still believes the case against Marshal was anything more than a clerical error.
Now I could be wrong: but things are starting to add up.
VOTE WAGONLITZ
Worth mentioning I was nearly lynched day 1.... I certainly have been getting more attention then I would like. If you still wish to read my posts I produced a selection of them all in one place on page 36
And I think ive explained my reasons for voting K-59 many times: there were no decent cases that didn't have to do with inactivity, and K-59 was much more inactive then everyone else.
