Oh, Iron should definitely be lynched, alongside the likes of Capibara and/or Yahmik. Some extremely shady stuff going on at deadline yesterday.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
.png){kind=avatar}
If those reasons were the reasons you were voting me, you'd have said that, not some nonsense about believing in Yakman. I hope you forgive me for other people not voting me based off a hunch.
Holy empty hedging post, Batman. No explanation of why you don't like the case, no explanation of why you do like the case on me, idle talk about Ironhide's suspiciousness without actually voting him, and some poorly explained case on Wombat. So many alarm bells ringing here.
Oh, and before I forget,
Vote Aedan
You make a good point, and I have to say I've been finding aedan's behavoir edging towards the suspicious side this game.
Vote Aedan
Quoi? If Yakman had proof he'd have given it a long time ago. This is too rubbish reasoning for your doing.
Vote Tornadoli
Vote Cliges
I eventually did proper vote analysis (with spreadsheet, colours and stuff) and it turns out that Cliges voted 4 times on confirmed villagers and not once on a confirmed baddie. Coupled with some suspicious actions and the fact that baddie JM defended him from lynch on day 1 I think the case is pretty solid here.
I eventually did proper vote analysis (with spreadsheet, colours and stuff) and it turns out that Cliges voted 4 times on confirmed villagers and not once on a confirmed baddie. Coupled with some suspicious actions and the fact that baddie JM defended him from lynch on day 1 I think the case is pretty solid here.
Yakman seems like one of those cody-type players, you can't reason with or about them.
I tried to be rational about cody, and it turned out I was wrong. Now, the rational thing yakman would do if he had any reliable info is to do an outing, but who knows how yakman thinks? He might not want to get hunted or something, I don't know.
That part of the case actually isn't quite valid anymore, as it required Lemeard voters to be potential wolves. But I believe there are some more convincing arguments against Ironhide laying around, still.
As I said I'm short of time now but I wanted to vote. I've voted a lot of times Ironhide before and I don't want to tunneling him at least until I see some news about the case. I'll come back in a while so I could explain better.
There's a difference between lynching someone for doing stupid shit and believing in their conspiracy theories because they're doing stupid shit. By your logic I'd have to vote the same as Cody every game because who knows, maybe Cody scanned the player he votes for?
How is it ridiculous? It is EXACTLY the same reasoning some players here (maybe you included as well, can't be bothered to check now) used for the cody case on Day 1. Somehow, using it on cody was fine, but using it now is not?
Because you acted wolfish and have done nothing to clear yourself in my eyes.
People are like "oh, Yakman! You tunnelling!"
Then they go vote CAWZ and kill a villager. They happened to have run up your packmate the same day - the packmate that I accused! - and BOOM!... wolf.
Now, what's the answer? Where's the COLLECTIVE SHAME COMING FROM ALL OF YOU?
crickets I hear. crickets.
AUDREN MUST HANG!
So being one of the most important votes in killing Lemeard the wolf isn't as least partially clearing?
I wouldn't say so. You were already put up there as packmates by yakman before, it would be the perfectly rational thing to do. In fact, it's what I'd expect you to do if you were actually packmates.
it was important only in that it was there.
however, you were only the third vote on him, when the situation was rapidly developing AS I HAVE POINTED OUT ALREADY.
and AS I HAVE POINTED OUT ALREADY you couldn't very well move your vote off of him when it would have saved him because of the already DEMONSTRATED connection betwixt you and your packmate. Thus, you ended up voting for him. But your exoneration from that vote is a sham lie brought up by RED WOLF APOLOGISTS.
I'm the one that started the whole push towards Lemeard yesterday. Why would I do that, if my packmate was nowhere near getting lynched. Now, if al-Aziz had voted him again, and k-59 jumped on, then maybe me selling Lemeard out would be plausible. But as the first vote on him? It doesn't make sense. Yakman at least is too stubborn to change his mind about this (I am, too; I still think he's a baddie). But you? There's no reason for you to believe in this nonsense.
No, I was the first vote, and it was my vote that got al-Aziz to return to her earlier case, and it was our support that got k-59 on board, and all three of us that got the ball moving to kill him. If I didn't vote him, al-Aziz would've stayed on whoever she was voting, and he wouldn't have been a candidate at all yesterday. I propelled that case yesterday, and you're suggesting I would do all that just to disprove an already ridiculous connection between me and Lemeard? Nonsense.
As poorly thought out as Yakman's arguments are. He was right about Lemeard being a wolf, so
Vote Audren
I also agree here. That does seem like something Audren would do.
Vote Audren
I also agree here. That does seem like something Audren would do.
The Audren case is made less likely by him making an active effort to lynch a Red (Lemeard). Could still be a yellow, of course.
A very curious statement, because you've voted for the same person as me in 3 cases (sleepyhead, Jerman and Ironhide). I noticed Chieron's defense of Ironhide, pushed the Ironhide case, and stuck with him yesterday in the face of a potential tie. What a difference a day makes, huh? I'm inclined to agree with Aziz's case on you from earlier - you're not playing up to your usual level. You also voted Cody day 1 (villager) AFTER initially defending him, sleepyhead day 2 (villager), Jerman days 3 and 4 (presumably unattached baddie), and Ironhide day 5 (unknown). I wanted to vote you on day 3, as you've felt off all game, and you've done nothing to distinguish yourself since then.
Vote De Chatillon