-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Alright. Fair enough point. I realize it was a goof up- a big one of that, and as such I can't defend but say it was a goof up. But TBH I actually am really busy- it is the the 'Tech Week' before another show of mine- though considering that somedays I still have managed to find breaks during the rehearsal. I apologize for the action and I'll try not to do it in the future. Also when I can I'll try to rectify my CAWZ- though I am normally very busy. I want to become a better WW player, though I doubt that'll ever happen.
Anyway, Gorgan seems a good case for CAWZ. Though voting him may seem hypocritical, I think he has the best case we have so far. I know I may seem hypocritical for this, but I will try to be active when I can.
Vote Gorganslayer
((By the way I'm on my lunch break, so I won't be active for a while after this post. Not sure if I will be able to be back before deadline.))
VOTE HEALTH
as a placeholder, I'm hoping I can be back before deadline but I can't be sure.
as a placeholder, I'm hoping I can be back before deadline but I can't be sure.
Why don't you make one instead of complaining about others not doing the work for you?
If I had one then I wouldn't be noting the lack of good cases today, would I?
Complaining and making an observation are two different things, Torn, and if you read real closely you'll notice I specifically used "opened up" rather than "have been presented" because that includes cases that may not have yet been presented.
Honestly, it's like you're looking for reasons to be offended at completely innocuous statements, Torn.
Honestly, it looks like you're looking for reasons to make up things like I'm offended, even though I'm not offended.
"Hey shut up, you couldn't do better" sounds at least slightly annoyed to my ears, a little indignant, and certainly sounds like you took issue with what I said or how I said it.
You did order mild Hazbot's Ragesauce, I believe, and the house rarely fails to deliver.
Nothing great for today. Normally I wouldn't like to run up gorgan again, because Jerman saving him yesterday is very likely to be a red herring, but he probably wasn't in touch with packs anyways, so it doesn't clear gorgan, and gorgan is making no contribution to the game, even after being told that he got run-up yesterday for CAWZ. If that's not going to get activity out of him, nothing will. Plus he has nothing clearing him from either pack, unlike most other candidates today.
Vote Gorganslayer
Vote Gorganslayer
Y'know what I feel a bit happy that the Yakman/Audren thing has died down. However considering it all I'd like to avoid dealing out Holy Justice towards them unless the JL says otherwise.
Now onto business, I feel that the case on Gorgan seems decent enough, whilst not amazing Gorgan has demonstrated an unwillingness to speak, besides voting, as many others have rightfully pointed out.
The case on Lemeard seems interesting from the perspective that we don't have much on him besides the Holy TIEs from his votes.
Then we have Ironhide, I find it always a bit read trying to read Ironhide, but it does seem that he is going to be a bit inactive, which whilst terrible for a villager could provide ample coverage for a wolf. Now whilst not amazing it does seem like a better choice than piling onto Gorgan, unless a JL has some info to provide.
VOTE IRONHIDE
However we do have a living wombat after D3. Do I smell a possible wolf?
Now onto business, I feel that the case on Gorgan seems decent enough, whilst not amazing Gorgan has demonstrated an unwillingness to speak, besides voting, as many others have rightfully pointed out.
The case on Lemeard seems interesting from the perspective that we don't have much on him besides the Holy TIEs from his votes.
Then we have Ironhide, I find it always a bit read trying to read Ironhide, but it does seem that he is going to be a bit inactive, which whilst terrible for a villager could provide ample coverage for a wolf. Now whilst not amazing it does seem like a better choice than piling onto Gorgan, unless a JL has some info to provide.
VOTE IRONHIDE
However we do have a living wombat after D3. Do I smell a possible wolf?
Votecount (~2.5 hours to deadline)
Ironhide: 6
Gen. Marshall [955]
De Chatillon [960]
Dr.Livingstone [978]
deathbywombat [981]
Tornadoli [1011]
Health [1032]
Gorganslayer: 4
Lemeard [1012]
Ironhide [1022]
Hazbot [1024]
aedan [1031]
Lemeard: 3
Audren [979]
Aziz [965 Health -> 980]
Yakman [982]
Health: 1
Tamius [1023]
Not Voted: 7
@Spockyt
@Yahmik
@Capibara
@k-59
@Cliges
@Gorganslayer
@Eternaly_Lost
Ironhide: 6
Gen. Marshall [955]
De Chatillon [960]
Dr.Livingstone [978]
deathbywombat [981]
Tornadoli [1011]
Health [1032]
Gorganslayer: 4
Lemeard [1012]
Ironhide [1022]
Hazbot [1024]
aedan [1031]
Lemeard: 3
Audren [979]
Aziz [965 Health -> 980]
Yakman [982]
Health: 1
Tamius [1023]
Not Voted: 7
@Spockyt
@Yahmik
@Capibara
@k-59
@Cliges
@Gorganslayer
@Eternaly_Lost
only because the village is purposely ignoring the two obvious wolves who are obvious.
So both you and Audren.
Though I cannot dismiss the likelihood of you being wolves, I'd like to move with only further info from scanners.
See this is why votecounts are good, if I had know this before hand I'd have gone for the TIE to make this more interesting.
.png){kind=avatar}
That reminds me, I forgot to vote Yakman.
UNVOTE LEMEARD
VOTE YAKMAN
But if y'all won't get behind Lemeard, I find Gorganslayer to be the more appealing candidate, if only because Ironhide's actually trying a bit here.
UNVOTE YAKMAN
VOTE GORGANSLAYER
I'm going to vote for Lemeard becuasuse Hazbot is right about the lack of cases and Lemeard at least isn't a retread. @AUden move back
Vote Lemeard
Vote Lemeard