-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
.png){kind=avatar}
Yakman is either a baddie or an idiot. I have a high enough of him to believe the former.
You kidding right? That wasn't even close to a case, how can I be a "probable wolf" with such a weak argument? I'm not throwing suspicions against Ironhide, I'm trying to see how he responds to the acusations. And if he doesn't answer anything, then yes, I will throw suspicions against him.
Also, acusing someone for casting suspicions to anothers and after talking about four players as "probable wolves" with such an arguments is absolutely hilarious.
Last edited:
Maybe "probable" is too strong of a word. Greater likelihood of being a wolf than any random given player.
It's not just Ironhide. It's also that you seem to have been skating along without much explanation, and by following really spurious cases.
On D1, let's look back to see what you did:
An odd turnaround.
You begin to pursue the case, making excuses for any caveats found.
You vote Sleepy, but attempt to defer any fallout to tamius.
A quick deflection of suspicion from Spock.
Following a case without much explanation.
Then you begin advocating for voting Ironhide:
The problem with this is that it was close enough to deadline that he might have died, and he had stated he would ignore such inquiries, and the question and the case itself were both extremely lackluster.
Again, you appear overeager to prosecute.
Pursuing this weak case, you repeatedly try to prosecute until....
you abruptly change pace at the last minute.
And anyway, with his important vote on Jackson, Ironhide isn't actually a very likely wolf. Around half of the possibilities are eliminated completely for him, meaning some silence and a TIE made aren't a good reason to place him in danger. Your abrupt and unexplained switch, however, suggests you wanted to avoid responsibility despite trumping up the "case", and that you wanted to cast suspicion on someone else to bring into the TIE.
I doubt that running up Iron is actually going to bring us anything besides a wasted day. So from the night we can probably guess that either a cursed was caught, a blessed was hit or we have a GA. I'm still not that convinced by any of the cases, but for the Yak/Aud arguementathon is not amazing. For the moment and until something swims up, I'll vote for this quote.
VOTE TAM
Could you explain the wolfish actions by Togee once more?
VOTE TAM
Could you explain the wolfish actions by Togee once more?
Awesome how everything you said in this post has no sense at all. It's strange how you "forget" to quote this message:
When you can see that I was thinking the same you're saying, that it was late and that's why I changed my vote. But you quoted a lot of messages but not that one. Really suspicious...
And yes, I want to see Ironhide's answer. You're acusing me for something that I wrote a hundred times in this post. If you don't want to see what he says it's your thing. If his answer is good, I will change my vote.
Last edited:
.png){kind=avatar}
Do you actually think he is a baddie? Just contacting you might make sense for an unattached baddie, but contacting 3 other players to "out" you? What would an unattached baddie gain from this?
But... why? If yakman is an unattached baddie and believes that audren is a baddie, then he either gets audren lynched (why would he want to kill a fellow baddie?) or he gets himself lynched with this stunt.
How long are you people going to keep focusing on the Audren-Yakman mess, despite repeated explanations as to why it isn't helpful?
Health is sticking out to me. His vote on Tamius makes little sense, why single out Tamius to focus on amidst all the Togee voters? And not just single out for examination, but to vote as well. Seems rather quick for how little he's going on. He's been tie happy also, which is particularly bad regarding his calls for an Audren-Yakman tie, something likely to lynch two villagers. And he gave a minor defense to Spockyt without actually addressing the case against Spockyt.
Vote Health
Health is sticking out to me. His vote on Tamius makes little sense, why single out Tamius to focus on amidst all the Togee voters? And not just single out for examination, but to vote as well. Seems rather quick for how little he's going on. He's been tie happy also, which is particularly bad regarding his calls for an Audren-Yakman tie, something likely to lynch two villagers. And he gave a minor defense to Spockyt without actually addressing the case against Spockyt.
Vote Health
I chose Tamius because he stuck out the most to me and I've almost forgotten to vote twice now due to falling into the pit of despair that is MMO's with friends, more exactly LOTRO with friends.
I've called to solve the Aud/Yak argument in the best way that I can see and that is shutting both of them down. We still have no knowledge of whether or not they are villagersand as such I treat them like I treat any other player until proven innocent, that is a possible wolf. I do agree that both of them are unlikely to be wolves but that is not impossible. However if we let this stupid argument go on that will take more time from the village that should be spent on better things like finding more wolves.
I've lost the case on Spocky, is it that Spocky is acting suspicious and as such should be lynched? I'll go over the thread to find it once more, but until then could somebody willing to push said case make a statement for it.
I do agree that both of them are unlikely to be wolves, however I do treat them as possible wolves. It would take a lot of stupid plays from both of them to get to this situation, if they were both baddies, but I cannot count that out.
My point remains; why on Earth would you want to TIE two people you consider unlikely wolves? Of course they could be wolves, but so could a JL spokesman who outed 2 wolves; should we start lynching JL spokesmen as well, then?
Yakman is a baddie, mark my words. But, despite his affinity for LOTRO (is that game still good? haven't played for ages), I like this case on Health.
UNVOTE YAKMAN
VOTE HEALTH
UNVOTE YAKMAN
VOTE HEALTH
If I remember correctly this has already happened, but that is besides the point. I do see that TIEing both of them is a terrible idea, considering that this chance was not used yesterday. As you can read from the post that you quoted I felt that both of them were acting suspicious and thus I felt that more info could be gained from a possible TIE. However I am not advocating for a TIE anymore, at least of not those two.
It is pretty fun, a bit grindy if you want to go fully F2P, but still rather fun. As I said earlier, I spent most of my weekend playing it until late at night. The only problem that I currently have with it is that the game isn't willing to take my money. Oh, a fair bit of warning if you are considering rejoining most of the EU servers are crowded with the French who refuse to speak English and then mock you for not understanding them. The US servers are pretty cozy though.
Basically, yes. I've had a hard time defending myself, because I haven't done anything "unsuspicious". Aside from voting Jackson, but I haven't done anything making me unsuspicious to e a red wolf.