What about what I said made me sound panicky? Irritated, perhaps, that your only evidence is "he helped lynch delta" which applies to more than a dozen living people. But no, I'm not panicking. I'm just defending myself.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
What about what I said made me sound panicky? Irritated, perhaps, that your only evidence is "he helped lynch delta" which applies to more than a dozen living people. But no, I'm not panicking. I'm just defending myself.
This post sounds very panicky for example.
You have 2 votes on you, and as you noticed I never said that I voted for you for lynching delta... Until you said "hey look split is suspicious because he "outed" delta" at that point I simply brought up your own voting record....
I may be a little quiet today. I'll try to get my analysis in today. For now, I'll say that while wagon does not strike me as especially suspicious due to torn being unattached, I do find that his behaviour is a little more interesting than most of the other Torn voters. For now, I want to put a little pressure on his case.
Vote Wagon
Vote Wagon
You think I would defend torn in that way if I was a baddie?
Interesting.... This is a non-statement of I ever saw one.... Suspicious but not really? But suspicious?
Here have a vote, because you are acting rather strange...
Unvote Canada ohh Canada
Vote Livingstone
Trying to fly under the radar, are we?
Well, without voting for me for lynching Delta, you have precisely nothing but gut instinct to go off of. The fact that you outing delta has made you already suspicious was just a side effect. (I should point out that that, more than anything, helped kill him)
Wow, that's like The Baddie Tell. I didn't think people did that anymore.
But, hey, if you get a lot of dead seals close to election day, why not take advantage of it to further the Green cause?
unvote Jerman, vote Livingstone
Jeez, it's always when I have no time that I'm called out for poor votes. That post above was poorly worded. I meant to convey that I found Wagon the most suspicious player as of yet, but I'm still having my doubts about his case. I do plan on going back and changing my vote once I do go back and find a better candidate, but as of now wagon seemed like as good a candidate as any.
That post really screams baddie.
So you vote me despite not being too convinced. And you make sure to make it known you are on the fence so that you have a way out later. You don't want to post analysis, but just promise it soon^{tm}. And you also publicly state that you intend to change your vote later meaning that it can pretty much be disregarded for now and if you end up not changing it you have a ready excuse about how you wanted to, but was hindered due to x.
Unvote Jerman
Vote Livingstone
Votecount, 8h 15m to deadline
Dr.Livingstone (4): THE_SPLIT [1112 Canadian -> 1125], johho888 [1085 JermanTK -> 1127], Wagonlitz [1084 Jerman -> 1129], EUROO7 [1132]
JermanTK (3): aedan777 [1074], Kaisersohaib [1086], AVN [1087]
Wagonlitz (2): LatinKaiser [1037], Dr.Livingstone [1123]
Rovsea (2): Nautilu [1080], Yakman [1110]
Canadian_95_RTS (1): Sleepyhead [1035]
Falc (1): jacob-Lundgren [1103]
Eternaly_Lost (1): Jacksonian Missionary [1107]
Spockyt (1): Rovsea [1116]
Not voted (27): Hazbot, k-59, Capibara, Mder1, Rendap, Eternaly_Lost, Falc, deathbywombat, Audren, madchemist, Luftwafer, JCan, alxeu, Hax, Chieron, Spockyt, Canadian_95_RTS, Gen. Marshall, Yahmik, Lemeard, Gorganslayer, Togee, marty99, Adamus, JermanTK, Gen. Skobelev, CaesarCzech
Missed a vote: Kaisersohaib, CaesarCzech
Is posting meta evidence frowned upon? I saw nothing in the rules, though I may of missed it.
It's against the spirit of the game. In the time you've spent defending yourself with pitiful excuses, you could have made a valuable contribution to the game instead of doing everything humanly possible to appear to be a baddie.
Then I will rescind my meta, and try to make an effort to bring an alternative candidate.
After thinking about this for a while. I decided that a rival to a cursed player is likely a cursed or a cultist.
Either way, he is a good lynch.
Vote Jerman
I'd brag about having been right yesterday, but really that ought to have been so obvious that a collection of 8-year-olds could have figured it out.
The CAWZ notes with great dismay the continued existence of two nonvoters from yesterday. It is our non-negotiable demand that these parties be either replaced or removed at the earliest opportunity.
Vote Kaisersohaib
As far as today's discussion goes, the CAWZ does not see significant harm in Jerman's claim to have been a rival of the cursed delta. Cursed/blessed rival pairs have been seen in the past, among others, and there is little advantage to his having admitted to such a rivalry if he is evil. We find the pressure on Livingstone for his unfulfilled promises of analysis to be acceptable, however.
The CAWZ notes with great dismay the continued existence of two nonvoters from yesterday. It is our non-negotiable demand that these parties be either replaced or removed at the earliest opportunity.
Vote Kaisersohaib
As far as today's discussion goes, the CAWZ does not see significant harm in Jerman's claim to have been a rival of the cursed delta. Cursed/blessed rival pairs have been seen in the past, among others, and there is little advantage to his having admitted to such a rivalry if he is evil. We find the pressure on Livingstone for his unfulfilled promises of analysis to be acceptable, however.
It was here I originally found wagons behaviour strange. While the use of x may be protection for a goodie, his inclusion in the PMs struck me as a bit odd.
And then wagon posts an accustom against Jerman, which quickly led to a rush of votes against him, one less than a minute after the accusation was posted. I feel like this was a coordinated attack against Jerman. As to Jerman himself, I find the case on him weak, for it assumes that the rival chains alternate between cursed villager and baddie. I think that's a big assumption to make as we only have last nights evidence to go on.
vote falc
No reason. Kind of unhappy seeing the possible wacky set up.
And here two throwaways. I find throwaways far more suspicious than anything else, and really this is where I think our attention should be.
Unvote Wagon
Vote Jacob-Lundgren.