Weekly Poll: What scenarios would you like to play?

[unmerged(46341)]

I've never been interested in any of the "shorter" scenarios in Paradox Games. It just doesn't feel like your getting the full game otherwise. The exception being the Battle Scenarios in HoI2, as they were distinctly separate little "Mini-Games" if you will.

 

[Lurken]

Grand Campaign all the way baby!

 

[Shuriken]

GC is all I ever play, but I do open the others up and look at the pretty maps.

 

[Avernite]

1453 and 1575, for much the same reasons as Registered.

I want to be the Dutch and save Antwerp from the Spanish

 

[LouisSteColombe]

I don't tihnk I understand why those dates were picked?

1625? I'd rather have 1618 or 1630!

I'd say: 1453, 1520, 1580, 1618

Louis,

 

[King]

I went for:

1453 (the GC)
1500 (just because I could)
1625 (The Thirty years war)
1700 (The War of the Spanish Succession)

 

[unmerged(6303)]

I'm hoping for lots of scenarios, plus a robust editor so that you can create what-if scenarios with a few mouseclicks, to make up for the fact that the GC will progress in a less historical way.

 

[unmerged(53986)]

GC and
1550, map has developed further, many empires have taken their critical areas, thus provding a improved platform.


Most later scenarios i often found terribly lacking, no taxcollectors and such. So while a 1700 might be intresting, well, but then again, will it be done properly with mayors etc.. properly developed colonies?

 

[Carolus Rex]

Those that tickle me are 1453, 1500, 1525, 1625(TYW), 1700.

 

[joriandrake]

I would like all these scenarios as choosable beginning campaigns, and also time of 1409 or so

 

[Hive]

If you have a scenario preference that would fall between dates, vote for the ones on either side of the date.

I just picked the ones I did because I was...

1. too lazy to look po precise historical dates of "real" ones

2. If I published the exact ones that are being considered at a design level I would find myself in a noose, dangling from the nearest yardarm.

Well, then you should have left the poll to me.

 

[unmerged(2669)]

1453, as I only ever played the GC. Helpful :ja:

 

[lenny]

My votes went to 1453 (GC), 1525 (Reformation, religious wars in Europe), 1650 (post TYW).

 

[BiB]

I voted for 1525, 1550 and 1575. Oh, and the GC I will probably play too

 

[jpd]

Since I like making the biggest mark possible, only the earliest possible start year will do

 

[OriginalRafiki]

I'm with jpd; I've started later scenarios to have a look-see, but it's the GCs that really get played

 

[Van Engel]

1453 (obvious GC) and 1800? for a possible Nappy Scen.

 

[unmerged(54173)]

1453, 1525, 1600, 1650, 1700, 1750, 1775, 1800

 

[Rey]

1453, 1500, 1625, 1700 and 1800!

 

[EvilSanta]

1453,through even better would be 1419 but 53 is okay.