Wednesday Game - The Friendly Time Zone

[wryun]

The roster looks evil.

I just hope Wyrun can be able to survive both Polish, French and Turkish onslaught.

Should I be scared?

...

Ok, I'm scared

 

[BurningEGO]

Nah, you shouldnt be scared... at all. Spain is most likely there to help you vs the turks or vs the french...

 

[Aleksidze]

Alright i Geuss ill join as Russia, this is 7 pm my time so its doable.

Great... Sid in the Soviet Union, EGO over Poland... jeez, at least there isn't a Brandemburg player.

 

[BurningEGO]

Thats good. isnt it.

Oh, and Alek in Denmark... The perfect roster has been set!

 

[unmerged(1631)]

Awesom! We now have a game going, we still need a sub for England though...

Edit: Could you post your ICQ Number pls?

Hey Guys,

If you can't find a sub, I'll be around the house so I can run England every now and then - more so after a romantic dinner A sub would be better but I can screenwatch if need be.

We could work out a phone signal out for rehosts (let it ring twice then hang up) so England won't be Ai'd. I'm sure "The Queen" would be alright with that

..... just trying to make it work

 

[Aleksidze]

An edit request for the GM:

Denmark is missing a pair of cores in Wismar (1420) and Lattaglia (1009). The last prov doesn't matter, but I could use a core in Wismar, as I have cores in all the german coast.

 

[unmerged(60520)]

An edit request for the GM:

Denmark is missing a pair of cores in Wismar (1420) and Lattaglia (1009). The last prov doesn't matter, but I could use a core in Wismar, as I have cores in all the german coast.

In the save we are using Denmark already had a core in Wismar.

 

[BurningEGO]

Well, there are a lot of cores missing on 1453 - drake forgot em and since he isnt "updating" it, you better forget it. Spain misses core in Baleares, Poland in Latgalia as well and in Polotsk.

Denmark, isnt the only one.

 

[Aleksidze]

Well, there are a lot of cores missing on 1453 - drake forgot em and since he isnt "updating" it, you better forget it. Spain misses core in Baleares, Poland in Latgalia as well and in Polotsk.

Denmark, isnt the only one.

You just want the Teutonic Order for yourself.

Ok, so, can the GM post the save we're using for our first session then?

 

[unmerged(60520)]

You just want the Teutonic Order for yourself.

Ok, so, can the GM post the save we're using for our first session then?

Done, check the first post

EDIT: Check the 3rd post also!

 

[Casluerj]

I dont think I'd like to play a game without historical leaders... They are essential for the game... They existis for a lot of reasons (balance would be one of them).

 

[unmerged(60520)]

I dont think I'd like to play a game without historical leaders... They are essential for the game... They existis for a lot of reasons (balance would be one of them).

Well I asked for a vote and it ended up 2 vs 1 and the reason that the 1 made where refuted by me, and he never complained again; so I took off the historical leaders, and no one else complained back then when I proposed it.

 

[Aleksidze]

Im up for ahistorical leaders, or else you can switch me to Sweden... Denmark doesn't have pwnage leaders.

 

[Casluerj]

Well I asked for a vote and it ended up 2 vs 1 and the reason that the 1 made where refuted by me, and he never complained again; so I took off the historical leaders, and no one else complained back then when I proposed it.

Damn it.. I didnt check it... Ok then... I wont argue since I didnt see it was open for vote, but EU2 needs historical leaders, IMO.

Im up for ahistorical leaders, or else you can switch me to Sweden... Denmark doesn't have pwnage leaders.

I've anwered your PM

 

[BurningEGO]

Well, to be honest, i also dont like the idea of having to play with MT leaders... They are the worst IMO.

A game with only historical leaders and/or random ones tend to be the most funny, if not balanced as well. MT just stinks.

So, that makes 2 votes for, and 2 votes against. Seems like a draw.

 

[unmerged(66017)]

No draw.
And the winner are.....historical leaders.

Sorry, I forgot vote when i seen that post, and later i forgot about that post.

 

[unmerged(60520)]

As I don´t want to be considered an autoritarian I will allow the historical leaders only if the odds are in favor of such choice.

At the current time it´s 3 vs 3

Non Historical:
. Ironfist
. Mr Lifford
. Aleksidze

Historical:
. Casluerj
. BurningEgo
. Mad Max

So either you get two more votes or we go with non historical and MT Leaders Generator.

 

[unmerged(1631)]

As I don´t want to be considered an autoritarian I will allow the historical leaders only if the odds are in favor of such choice.

At the current time it´s 3 vs 3

Non Historical:
. Ironfist
. Mr Lifford
. Aleksidze

Historical:
. Casluerj
. BurningEgo
. Mad Max

So either you get two more votes or we go with non historical and MT Leaders Generator.

Is the Historical option a hybrid of the two (both historical and MT) or just plain ol Historical? I would be open to the former if that is the case.

 

[Aleksidze]

Is the Historical option a hybrid of the two (both historical and MT) or just plain ol Historical? I would be open to the former if that is the case.

I think It's just historicals with random leaders (w/out MT). o

But I really liked playing without Hist Leaders, It gives a different flavor to the game, and opens more posibilities, like getting a Burgundian player par example.

 

[BurningEGO]

As i said before, historicals with randoms (NOT UBBER RANDOMS BTW), or a game with only "decent randoms" is what i think would be the best. I dont think randoms should be awesome, because then, there would be no point to have a kickassing general like Farnense/Prinze Eugen/Napoleon, etc.

I just really hate MT if you didnt notice.

And well, it seems that even Daniel/Drake abuse the MT system by making "fake wars" with each other just to raise their MT in order to get good leaders, which, with all respect, seems a bit... gamey.