Situation from my current game (It is RC-B, but still...)
I'm playing Croatia and I'm engaged in a war against Golden Horde for at least 20 years. It looks more like a turn based game with all the pauses for battles won/lost etc. It's an epic struggle and neither side is winning.
I managed to capture 10-20 enemy provinces and those became demesne of my vassals. No problem there. My warscore is around -100 to -200 mainly due to lost battles against the Hordes. I imagine that my vassals have a similiar score.
They are at war with the Horde so they can accept peace terms. Since they have a negative warscore they give provinces to Monogols for free. In other words, they give away provinces that Mongols do not control. Sometimes it's 4-5 provinces. It creates large 'pockets' which I have to recounquer. Not easy. When I do, provinces go back to my vassals and the cycle repeats.
My guess is that this is caused by negative warscore accumulated from lost battles.
My question is:
Is this realistic? Should the warscore be tweaked or something?
I'm playing Croatia and I'm engaged in a war against Golden Horde for at least 20 years. It looks more like a turn based game with all the pauses for battles won/lost etc. It's an epic struggle and neither side is winning.
I managed to capture 10-20 enemy provinces and those became demesne of my vassals. No problem there. My warscore is around -100 to -200 mainly due to lost battles against the Hordes. I imagine that my vassals have a similiar score.
They are at war with the Horde so they can accept peace terms. Since they have a negative warscore they give provinces to Monogols for free. In other words, they give away provinces that Mongols do not control. Sometimes it's 4-5 provinces. It creates large 'pockets' which I have to recounquer. Not easy. When I do, provinces go back to my vassals and the cycle repeats.
My guess is that this is caused by negative warscore accumulated from lost battles.
My question is:
Is this realistic? Should the warscore be tweaked or something?