VIP:R 0.3 for Victoria:Revolutions 2.01 - Discussion and Bugs Thread

[RedRalphWiggum]

I got a weird bug playing as Persia, I had annexed Afghanistan (the scripted war never happened, but I got them later on anyway) in about 1850, then in about 1875, I got 'the Afghan rebellion', which didnht increase militancy in Afghanistan itself one little bit, but increased it by a gigantic amount in Persia itself. WTF?

 

[unmerged(131989)]

What was the actual name of the event, please? I'm trying to find what event you are on about, but there is't an event called "The Afghan Rebellion" that I can find.

 

[RedRalphWiggum]

What was the actual name of the event, please? I'm trying to find what event you are on about, but there is't an event called "The Afghan Rebellion" that I can find.

Sorry, I'm at my work computer at the moment so can't find it. I'll try and get it for you later. It was something like 'the Afghan revolt' or something along those lines. I'm pretty sure it was in the 1870s, and was meant to cause a revolt in Kabul and increase militancy across Afghanistan, but did neither, instead caused a huge increase in militancy all across Persia.

 

[unmerged(131989)]

Cheers.

 

[Lord_D]

Still playing my game as Italy, I have conquered Tunisia quite some time ago, but France recently had an event called "Opposition To The Franco-Tunisian Treaty Of Cooperation" (id 162666). It hasn't done me any harm and I don't think it will, but I still think it's weird this would fire when Tunisia doesn't exist. Apparently the event only occurs after a certain date in 1879 (which I just passed in my game) when one of two events (or both, as it's an OR trigger) has fired.

The first one is an Ottoman event about Franco-Tunisian Cooperation, so that makes sense. The second one however - the one that makes it possible the event triggered at me, as the other event certainly didn't trigger - is an event of British India, about the "Attack on the Fox". This all happened way back in 1852 and is part of an event chain in which British India takes over a part of Burma.

I fail to see any relevance between these two events and so I assume this must be a bug of some kind.

 

[unmerged(66785)]

In what context did you conquer Tunisia? By your own decision or through events?

 

[JoeGiavani]

1453 friend

huh?

 

[Lord_D]

In what context did you conquer Tunisia? By your own decision or through events?

My own decision. The Crimean war had started, and as I didn't get any invitation - I became Italy in 1848, Sardinia-Piedmont would've had an event for it but wouldn't - I decided to pick on the OE independently. So I dowed Tunis and annexed it, this way the UK and France weren't in a state of war with me

 

[Alyosha]

huh?

The year the Ottomans conquered Constantinople - in reference to when their military was so "badass."

 

[RedRalphWiggum]

Cheers.

This is the line of text I found in the notepad-opened savegame:

name = "December 28, 1867 : Revolt In Afghanistan happened to us."

 

[aenariel]

As Brazil I joined Argentina against Paraguay in the war of the Triple Alliance. I made separate peace with Paraguay earlier on before Argentina was able to run them down, and got a huge chunk of their territory. However, afterwards, Argentina was able to quickly overcome them (as they were left with only 4 provinces) and got one of the provinces I took from them earlier, by event. Just found it weird; it wasn't a problem to buy back that province later on, but anyway, if Paraguay doesn't own that province anymore, it shouldn't be awarded to the Argentinians IMHO.

 

[unmerged(131989)]

This is the line of text I found in the notepad-opened savegame:

name = "December 28, 1867 : Revolt In Afghanistan happened to us."

Apparently Persia should get that event (241211), though it was the consciousness which rose all over your country. This is repeated in the Russian and British versions of the event (251256 & 157203 respectively). I agree that the consciousness should be localised to Afghanistan, with perhaps a another line increasing consciousness more mildly across your home nation (as the war would likely raise a few eye brows, particularly considering it was an area of tension as it was at the heart of the Great Game).

As Brazil I joined Argentina against Paraguay in the war of the Triple Alliance. I made separate peace with Paraguay earlier on before Argentina was able to run them down, and got a huge chunk of their territory. However, afterwards, Argentina was able to quickly overcome them (as they were left with only 4 provinces) and got one of the provinces I took from them earlier, by event. Just found it weird; it wasn't a problem to buy back that province later on, but anyway, if Paraguay doesn't own that province anymore, it shouldn't be awarded to the Argentinians IMHO.

Yeah the triggers should probably have a check for that.

 

[SaberHRE]

I've done something wrong with the installation because when I try the VIP grand campaign I can only choose great britain?

 

[unmerged(131989)]

I've done something wrong with the installation because when I try the VIP grand campaign I can only choose great britain?

Right-click the flag. You'll be able to scroll through the other playable nations from there.

It's like that so if something goes wrong then you can save and reload and select any nation you please to correct what has gone wrong. There is also a multiplayer campaign available if you wish to compare stats with your rivals in the ledger.

 

[SaberHRE]

Right-click the flag. You'll be able to scroll through the other playable nations from there.

It's like that so if something goes wrong then you can save and reload and select any nation you please to correct what has gone wrong. There is also a multiplayer campaign available if you wish to compare stats with your rivals in the ledger.

ah ok, Thanks!

 

[jamhaw]

There seems to be something wrong with the Have We Sacrificed Too Much event. It was december 1861 The CSA ruled everything west of Cleveland (except Oregon) the only place the U.S. was winning was Virginia and the U.S. was fighting the British and the CSA had a loyal ally in the form of Texas. But then it suddelly they decided to become brother again. :wacko:

 

[unmerged(131989)]

If it reaches a war exhaustion of 60% it will do this. There are various circumstances, and it can choose no, but this is to maintain the historical flow.

 

[unmerged(56465)]

I got a weird bug playing as Persia, I had annexed Afghanistan (the scripted war never happened, but I got them later on anyway) in about 1850, then in about 1875, I got 'the Afghan rebellion', which didnht increase militancy in Afghanistan itself one little bit, but increased it by a gigantic amount in Persia itself. WTF?

I got a similar event as the Ottoman Empire having conquered Egypt. It was a different version of the Mahdist uprising that mentioned overthrowing the Turks specifically, but as above, it caused militancy throughout the entire empire instead of just Sudan. And try as I did, I couldn't find the thing, or I would have dealt with it myself. As it was, I just quit that game.

 

[unmerged(131989)]

I got a similar event as the Ottoman Empire having conquered Egypt. It was a different version of the Mahdist uprising that mentioned overthrowing the Turks specifically, but as above, it caused militancy throughout the entire empire instead of just Sudan. And try as I did, I couldn't find the thing, or I would have dealt with it myself. As it was, I just quit that game.

I can't find this particular event which you are referring to. What was it's name (if you still have the save game at hand)?

 

[unmerged(34416)]

Ukraine has Ismail as a core. I think this is maybe a mistake in the revolt.txt file.