I'm sure we've all noticed that it's not always -100 prestige for declaring war. Thing is, I can't figure out what makes it lower sometimes.
Certainly the strength of the opponent has something to do with it, as declaring on a major almost always costs less than 100 prestige.
There's something else going on, though. In my current game, some very minor countries were only -1 (one) to declare. Abu Dhabi, for example, and Zanzibar. Hawaii. Other essentially identical countries (say, Johore, or Travancore, or Bali) were -100s.
I can't find any common characteristic that distinguished the two groups. I heard it suggested that it may have to do with negative prestige, but that's not it. Countries in the negatives range across the map when it comes to the war declaration hit.
Does anyone have a clear idea of what makes a difference? I feel kind of stupid polling the whole world every few years looking for "easy targets". "Hmm, can I declare war on Madagascar cheaply? No...how about Oman? No...oh, look, Abu Dhabi's only a minus one. Abu Dhabi is and always was our enemy! Attack!"
Certainly the strength of the opponent has something to do with it, as declaring on a major almost always costs less than 100 prestige.
There's something else going on, though. In my current game, some very minor countries were only -1 (one) to declare. Abu Dhabi, for example, and Zanzibar. Hawaii. Other essentially identical countries (say, Johore, or Travancore, or Bali) were -100s.
I can't find any common characteristic that distinguished the two groups. I heard it suggested that it may have to do with negative prestige, but that's not it. Countries in the negatives range across the map when it comes to the war declaration hit.
Does anyone have a clear idea of what makes a difference? I feel kind of stupid polling the whole world every few years looking for "easy targets". "Hmm, can I declare war on Madagascar cheaply? No...how about Oman? No...oh, look, Abu Dhabi's only a minus one. Abu Dhabi is and always was our enemy! Attack!"