• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

unmerged(174613)

Banned
1 Badges
Oct 21, 2009
441
0
  • For The Glory
The British are building HMS Vanguard in the 1944 scenario (and maybe the 1945 scenario, I haven't tried it yet) but they don't have the blueprints to build any more. I would suggest giving the British that particular blueprint in the post-1941 scenarios.

Also, HMS Erebus and two other ships (monitors, IIRC) are represented by a single Great War-era battleship. I'd suggest either having three units or simply remove them. What is the logic in representing three separate ships with a single unit?
 
Upvote 0

Balesir

AoD's Old Geezer
146 Badges
Dec 23, 2005
3.145
1.699
  • Arsenal of Democracy
  • 200k Club
  • Darkest Hour
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
  • Crusader Kings II: Jade Dragon
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Deus Vult
  • Sengoku
  • March of the Eagles
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Hearts of Iron III: Their Finest Hour
  • For The Glory
  • Pride of Nations
  • Rome: Vae Victis
  • Warlock 2: The Exiled
  • Warlock 2: Wrath of the Nagas
  • Cities: Skylines Deluxe Edition
  • Rise of Prussia
  • Mount & Blade: Warband
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Megacorp
  • Crusader Kings III: Royal Edition
  • Steel Division: Normandy 44
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Surviving Mars
  • Imperator: Rome Deluxe Edition
  • Hearts of Iron II: Armageddon
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • East India Company
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Field Marshal
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Death or Dishonor
  • Battle for Bosporus
  • Hearts of Iron IV: La Resistance
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Hearts of Iron IV: By Blood Alone
  • Hearts of Iron IV: No Step Back
  • 500k Club
  • Victoria: Revolutions
  • Victoria 2
  • Victoria 3 Sign Up
  • PDXCON 2017 Gold Ticket holder
Also, HMS Erebus and two other ships (monitors, IIRC) are represented by a single Great War-era battleship. I'd suggest either having three units or simply remove them. What is the logic in representing three separate ships with a single unit?
Erebus, Terror, Marshal Soult and Roberts were what the RN called 'monitors'; basically what might be graded a light cruiser hull with a single battleship turret holding 2-3 battleship (15") guns. They were used for shore bombardment, and were significant in the defence of Tobruk and other operations in North Africa, D-Day and a few late operations in the Pacific. Unless we create a new ship type for these few vessels (only 3 were operational at any one time), I'm not sure how else they would be represented; Great War BB combines the advantages of being hopeless in the line of battle (they were never caught by enemy capital ships, but had they been it would have been terminal!) with having fair shore bombardment capacity.

If you don't like 'em, disband 'em.
 

unmerged(174613)

Banned
1 Badges
Oct 21, 2009
441
0
  • For The Glory
I know they were monitors, and why do you say that a Great War-era battleship would have been hopeless in the line of battle?

The majority of Britain's dreadnoughts during the Second World War were Great War-era.

I just don't see the logic in representing these vessels the way they are. Either add monitors as a separate blueprint or don't bother with them. They were strategically unimportant anyway. Is HMS Pegasus represented? If not, then why not?