• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

unmerged(150720)

Colonel
4 Badges
Aug 9, 2009
1.050
0
  • Heir to the Throne
  • Victoria: Revolutions
  • Semper Fi
  • Warlock: Master of the Arcane
Think Genoe.... and venice...etc. If they have a good navy it's no trouble.
You can't compare trading nations and kingdoms. Genoa's and Venice's reason to have land a few settlement a little bit far away was because of the trade. I don't think it was so god damn hard to hold a settlements, and why should the population even care if they were treated well? I would certainly not rebel if i were treated good and i think Genoa treated their far away land good or then they couldn't hold Caffa and Azow. Venice however had a stronger navy and military force, so they could of course hold their Greek provinces more in the way they wanted, still they fall to the Ottoman Empire because of the Venetians intolerance. Even the god damn Orthodox patriarch supported the Muslims instead of his closer related Catholics.
 

Hidden Legend

Major
24 Badges
Feb 1, 2010
714
5
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Rome Gold
  • Heir to the Throne
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Crusader Kings II: Reapers Due
  • Crusader Kings II: Conclave
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • 500k Club
  • Rome: Vae Victis
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Victoria 2
  • Victoria: Revolutions
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Divine Wind
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
You can't compare trading nations and kingdoms. Genoa's and Venice's reason to have land a few settlement a little bit far away was because of the trade. I don't think it was so god damn hard to hold a settlements, and why should the population even care if they were treated well? I would certainly not rebel if i were treated good and i think Genoa treated their far away land good or then they couldn't hold Caffa and Azow. Venice however had a stronger navy and military force, so they could of course hold their Greek provinces more in the way they wanted, still they fall to the Ottoman Empire because of the Venetians intolerance. Even the god damn Orthodox patriarch supported the Muslims instead of his closer related Catholics.

If one is used to and has invested in a certain way of life which accords certain privalages requiring a near and accessable governmet. Some distant fool who says this is mine would be bound to aggrivate people into action. Despite Nationalism being considered the core of fascism many people throughout history do not want to be united with their enemies except as the rulers of said enemies. Hence many revolts. Think about what Machiavelli says. Men must be treated well or destroyed. Currently in game you stand arround and do "beeb" all for 50 years suddenly it is yours without difficulties. Then you can easilly change religion and can count suddenly on all taxes being promt and paid. That is not the way it should work in the game because in real life it sure didn't.

I dont see the problem in asking for realistic problems to be faced by the ai as well as the human requiring action to be implemented as the worst choice should be do nothing.

If we talk about Venice and Genoa, look at how many problems they had in holding their regions. The locals did not want them unless they were colonists, as such either a revolt would find ground or in the case of effective (effective not good) administration half hearted defense against another more local power was given. Is it realistic for Castile to support colonies on the Black sea cost next to Wallachia and not be attacked whilst it also tries to conquer North Africa.

I think that the further away from the capital or general provinces the harder it should be to administrate provinces and the harder it should be to supply a Navy or Army. It is not like any Empire was easy to form.
 

Generalmotors

Captain
10 Badges
Mar 11, 2009
493
4
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Victoria 2
  • Darkest Hour
That is not the way it should work in the game because in real life it sure didn't.

A game cannot imitate real life, because real life is made by people who take real decisions, and a game is a program, it was written to perform a certain action as a response to a certain situation and it will not act any other way , it cannot exit this written solution. It's all in the program. How would it be "real"? In what way? It's a computer game. If someone wants more reality, he can go to Africa, reality will hit .
 

Hidden Legend

Major
24 Badges
Feb 1, 2010
714
5
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Rome Gold
  • Heir to the Throne
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Crusader Kings II: Reapers Due
  • Crusader Kings II: Conclave
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • 500k Club
  • Rome: Vae Victis
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Victoria 2
  • Victoria: Revolutions
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Divine Wind
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
Generalmotors. What is the purpose of the game?

To simulate a scenario for the gamer.

What is the goal of a simulation? To be as close as possible within technical constraints and budget to the reality it impersonates. Giving a feeling of emersion.

What is so wrong with programining variables in decisions for the provinces and conquered vassals that makes it difficult to World Comquest throughout the game? It is not difficult if you have the source code and would add another dimension to the game without removing the fun.

I am well aware it is not real life. In reallife there is a 100% chance of death and no respawn. The game is a mental scenario. It should contain what it can for fullfillment of the purpose and experience.

I appreciate the work that goes into making such good games for us and would like to see some changes in future titles or expansions for my ammusement and other peoples. The changes are what makes the games different and worth the purchase. Otherwise, why buy a game with the same interface and conditions but tuned up graphics?

In fact why make a simulator if you have no wish to simulate the experience?