EarendilHE said:hostile? im just defending myself and friends![]()
Good thing i consider myself your friend
EarendilHE said:hostile? im just defending myself and friends![]()
Aladar said:Good thing i consider myself your friend![]()
Sit around and pretend you're Holland; tech and build a large amount of cash (what about 25-30K?), and then engage in an über-manu program, and start to dominate trade. Or you use the cash to, once you get conq/explorers, super-colonise with high naval/free trade/narrowminded slidersKanth said:Well, ultimately you are right, Iberia without colonization and even minimal chance to fight for Italy(since Venice is now uber country) there is not much I can do now for 70 years more now. Whats more when the time comes other countries will be so strong, and ofcourse I will stay without most of my best monarchs, that Spain will not be worthy opposition to England, Venice, France and maybe others. Rules of this campaign obviously do not favor Iberia.
Sounds quite acceptable.King John said:1) In the case of a gang, it will be much fairer to count each country the ganged one is fighting as a war than to count the entire conflict the same as you would a 1v1. It is not the same.
2) In the case of two alliances going at it, one country in that alliance could win against one country, but lose against another, so then you would have to count the wars seperately anyway.
3) In a situation such as in #2), were you to continue counting alliance wars in one big jumble aside from these situations, you would then have countries losing against half of an alliance earning MORE points than a country that simply defeats all of its opponents.
Aladar said:Tonio please generate leaders so i can edit the save.
Tonioz said:what normally prevents from editing the existing save and uploading to stats ?
Tonioz said:what is indians ?