Undocumented Changes in 1.23
- Thread starter Badesumofu
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
In my game, I just ate my ally by standing next to its drilling troops, declaring war on its ally, and then march right up onto its army and stackwiped it. Too easy to exploit really.
The HCC now seems to dissapear completely if the nation providing it gets full annexed.
If you only take part of their land, you have to pay extra.
If you go all in its gone.
This is a known bug but big enough to warrant inclusion here I think (just to get the word out):
You no longer get an additional merchant for 51% control of a trading company region.
You no longer get an additional merchant for 51% control of a trading company region.
This is actually vaguely documented, but nationalist rebels are now a lot more restricted.
They will only walk to siege down cores now. They won't siege primary culture land not their cores.
More importantly and undocumented, they will now only spawn in cores. So for example cyprus when taken has no valid Greek core to spawn from. Thus it will default to zealot or other non separatist rebel type.
They will only walk to siege down cores now. They won't siege primary culture land not their cores.
More importantly and undocumented, they will now only spawn in cores. So for example cyprus when taken has no valid Greek core to spawn from. Thus it will default to zealot or other non separatist rebel type.
Returning cores to my vassal now gives ZERO AE.
Isnt this a major change?
Im playing as a buddhist, is that the reason or did they include this major change without saying it?
Isnt this a major change?
Im playing as a buddhist, is that the reason or did they include this major change without saying it?
From some very basic modding experience I think you can't in any way affect starting units/manpower/their location, it's somewhat automatic and hardcoded. If you create your entire new nation and add it into game it still starts with an army and low manpower, size depending on developement.
So maybe province autonomy is different for Austria? Or they must have changed the entire calculation somehow then.
So maybe province autonomy is different for Austria? Or they must have changed the entire calculation somehow then.
They do under the right circumstances. If a TC has a merchant according to the UI, and so do ALL downstream TCs that you own, then you will get your merchants. So, for example having a one province TC in Ivory Coast with screw all power will mean you don't get any Merchants from anything upstream of that which is everything. However, if you revoke your Ivory Coast TC, you can make a Cape TC that will be able to get merchants. The make a Zanzibar one that gets a Merchant.
Hopefully it's fixed in the beta patch. I've added this to the OP because it is, as you say, a huge issue.
Last edited:
Oh yeah, I see that now. I got the merchant after getting control of another node downstream. Probably an old bug not related to recent changes.
I've noticed that before when I had an army or navy moving if I click on said group and then hovered on the arrow showing their movement I could get the exact date they were expected to arrive, but now it doesn't. Also playing as The Mamluks I can't form Egypt as it says "Mamluks needs Mamluks Government", which I have as I haven't changed governments.
What if your heir is a 6-6-6? Can you increase to 7 or does the event just not trigger or give you an option for the category that has 6 in it?
No, it's new. I got my merchants from upstream TCs despite not controlling Ivory Coast in previous patches. I'd guess it's somehow related to Trade Policies and that they tweaked some aspect of the code that checks node control.
I looked into that event - it's a RoM event and you can't get it if your heir has 5 or more in any stat. Generally I would disinherit any such heir so I never got that event before. This was for France's starting heir who I kept.
To add to the TUR-BYZ rivalry issue:
The Ottomans start with a Byzantium as a rival more often than not, but BYZ cannot rival them back. After the first monthly tick The Ottomans surpass them and receive some PP.
At least this was my result after two games.
The Ottomans start with a Byzantium as a rival more often than not, but BYZ cannot rival them back. After the first monthly tick The Ottomans surpass them and receive some PP.
At least this was my result after two games.
You can no longer use the "/" key when naming templates. This irritates me very much. I now have to use the "." key instead.
You cannot rival much smaller/bigger nations now, but AI can; also you cannot rival back if you're too big/small; also I couldn't change rival even when time expired and there were other powers to rival on the list. The latter is probably bug.
Maldives is now a nation that the AI will conquer. In the past they'd stick around to the end unless the player conquered them.
To be fair; it made no sense that Austria was at full manpower and army in 1444. The day after a Crusade they partook in ended.
Hungary; Poland; Ottomans and Austria should all be nowhere near full power in 1444.
Heh, don't tell the Ottophile part of the forum or you'll get your butt lit on fire.