We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Go unsiege Caceres. Then they'll be 100%'ed and surrender. It's a weird issue with the AI logic I've noticed, where they get higher war enthusiasm with no army than with a very weak one.
Go unsiege Caceres. Then they'll be 100%'ed and surrender. It's a weird issue with the AI logic I've noticed, where they get higher war enthusiasm with no army than with a very weak one.
That makes a (twisted) kind of almost-sense. Having no manpower and a badly depleted manpower is a bad situation, while having some manpower in the bank and all fielded regiments fully reinforced (all zero of them) mean some recovery chances.
That makes a (twisted) kind of almost-sense. Having no manpower and a badly depleted manpower is a bad situation, while having some manpower in the bank and all fielded regiments fully reinforced (all zero of them) mean some recovery chances.
I still think countries should get a pretty significant modifier towards accepting peace deals if they are currently fielding 0 soldiers. Something like "no army, +[Balanced and fair number]" or something.