Hello, I have no leader files yet, Falconette is the only one working on them right now and so far for Russia only. I already sent ministers to Bizon though.
I like Reagan's effects, the name not so much. The other's names and effects are good too (maybe except Kohl as there's a dispute
)He got along fine with Gorbachev as well, despite some of his speeches.
minister = {
trait = "Deng_Xiaoping" # Deng HoS (de facto)
id = 185
name = NPERSONALITY_DENG_XIAOPING
desc = DPERSONALITY_DENG_XIAOPING
position = HeadOfState
value = 0
command = { type = dissent value = 0.1 }
command = { type = production which = production when = national value = 0.10 }
command = { type = production which = supplies value = -0.1 }
command = { type = resource which = all value = 0.15 }
command = { type = province which = ic when = time value = -0.15 }
command = { type = province which = ic when = cost value = -0.15 }
command = { type = province which = infra when = cost value = -0.20 }
command = { type = province which = infra when = time value = -0.20 }
command = { type = production which = consumer value = 0.1500 }
command = { type = intelligence_chances which = smear_campaign when = national value = -5 }
command = { type = intelligence_chances which = found_partisans when = national value = 10 }
command = { type = intelligence_chances which = coup when = national value = 10 }
command = { type = intelligence_chances which = massmedia when = national value = -5 }
command = { type = research which = all when = time value = -0.05 }
command = { type = resource which = money value = 0.20 }
command = { type = diplomacy_chances which = influence_nation when = all value = 10 }
command = { type = diplomacy_chances which = alliance when = all value = -20 }
command = { type = diplomacy_chances which = trade when = all value = 10 }
command = { type = diplomacy_cost which = trade when = all value = -0.05 }
command = { type = diplomacy_cost which = influence_nation when = all value = -0.05 }
command = { type = diplomacy_cost which = offer_alliance when = all value = 0.2 }
command = { type = diplomacy_cost which = bring_to_alliance when = all value = 0.2 }
command = { type = diplomacy_cost which = join_alliance when = all value = 0.2 }
command = { type = production which = upgrading value = -0.0500 }
}DPERSONALITY_DENG_XIAOPING;Considered a 'capitalist roader' by Mao and denounced countless times, Deng Xiaoping found himself as the 'paramount leader' of China after Mao Zedong, becoming the standard bearer for the reformist faction within the Communist Party after the group's previous leader, Zhou Enlai, died. Believing in the welfare of the people, Deng preferred pragmatic actions over political dogma. Having some administrative and economic knowledge himself, he was able to outmaneuver his economically uneducated political opponents with crafty economic policies to implement his market reforms, such as claiming further expansionary market reforms would reduce inflation introduced by initial experiments with market reform. Said policies in reality only produce short term deflationary effects due to expansion of supply, before even greater inflation kicks in. Through these proposals, he was able to transition China from a highly inefficient decentralized communist system under Mao to the efficient modern mixed economy found today. Unfortunately, his tenure also saw a marked increase in corruption, a problem which is one of the main issues affecting China today. He never held an official post of power himself.;;;;;;;;;;X
NPERSONALITY_DENG_XIAOPING;Capitalist Reformer;;;;;;;;;;XFixed for you. There was actually a recession as a result of Reagan's policies at the onset. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_1980s_recession#Political_fallout. Reagen should get an IC penalty but money bonus and CG need bonus. I also dislike the trait name.
Modern cavalry
hansnery, in vanilla cavalry was one unit, but in mod it is divided, how correctly to name files for air and armoured cavalry? (temporally I put letter "x")
I'm a bit worried that in the end the mod will be slanted pretty hard towards one side of opinion towards leaders. I hope a balance is found.
That's why I'm asking people's opinions, if you disagree if any post them here so we can find a balance.Reading the previous comments i'm a bit worried about bias seeping into the game
)
, shows you my views on how well he did.
Initially I contemplated this possibility and approached Bizon with the idea. But he's already expanding the timeline of his mod and has a unique view design-wise. He keeps as close to vanilla as possible, my mod is going to change nearly all aspects of DH. Don't worry I don't hate youDon't get me wrong, I really like this mod and the setting, but IMO I kinda dislike the fact that it uses the E3 Map (that map is indeed awesome), but it eliminates the option to merge this mod with NWO2 or adding it to NWO2 for instance. I really, really liked the previous version which used the vanilla DH Full map. Please don't hate me, it's just my opinion
eeeex
. Maybe I hate myself for all the work it was needed to change the map.That's awesome.Some new pictures
I've thought of the possibility of civil war. But deciding which side each part of the country would fight would be difficult. Central Asia would probably stick with the hardliners if they were winning but I think it would only work if there was no Boris Yeltsin controlling Russia. Still, we can always go ahistorical.Oh, I thought that was only limited to the people actually developing the game.
Anyways I think the controversial leaders which in the thread seem to be Thatcher and Reagan, should be balanced out since it's one of those topics that's hotly debated today and is going to cause complaints either way and choosing a side on the issue will just make people that much angrier. In that respect I actually like Insert's posts ideas for Reagan and Thatcher.
As for the Soviets, they were racked with corruption and inefficiency but the blame shouldn't be solely put on Gorbachev, the USSR was like a tree with a healthy bark on the outside but a rotting interior. I don't know if the ideologies have been changed with this mod so I'll use the vanilla names. I think Gorbachev should be a Social-Democrat, Boris Yeltsin a (horribly ineffective) Market Liberal or (just as horrible) Social-Democrat (it's hard to pin him since he didn't affiliate with a party after the fall of the Soviet Union). Putin, if we're going that far in the timeline, should be a paternal-autocrat.
My idea for a very worst case scenario of a successful 1991 coup (picking the most authoritarian and unpopular options) would be that Russia makes a hardline lurch to Authoritarian Communism/Statism and tries to perform a Tienanmen Square like mop up on dissenters and protesters in Moscow as well as arresting many politicians only to make things worse, dissent rises and eventually the Republics break off from Russia either in defiance to the hardliners or an attempt to keep stability. Shortly after a Russian Federation will appear and a civil war will happen. During the civil war Russia would economically collapse, after the civil war the hardliners could try to exert control over the breakaway countries and take them back.
NATO could also have the option to step in and invade Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan to remove the nuclear weapons (with a as a side of regime change
That's all I can think of there.
