I wouldn't get any of the reforming events later since this event has to be forcefired. Only thing I will get is cores.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Venice International News
After Doge supposed we get good terms to stop possible endless flame with Sultan (and Sultan reacted promising, but then went to silence), Sultan suddenly sent us the diplomat in laughable manner. So looks like Sultan wants to be responsible for death of millions people and children.
After Doge supposed we get good terms to stop possible endless flame with Sultan (and Sultan reacted promising, but then went to silence), Sultan suddenly sent us the diplomat in laughable manner. So looks like Sultan wants to be responsible for death of millions people and children.
i've got no problems in making u into prussia Semlan. i'll talk to daniel if he is willing to make the necassary edits.
new rule in exploits is added.
If there is any evidence this one is exploited there will be harsh punishments.
If there is any evidence this one is exploited there will be harsh punishments.
No not at all, I would not mind a few sessions of peace. I never said I wanted a 1on1 with you though.Tonioz said:
Turns out I won't be able to attend todays session. I've asked around and the only promising sub is Lurken, who might show up around 20:00. I'll ask him to contact you guys on ICQ. I would appreciate it if OE was ghosted when not subbed, and the ghosts investments regulated as per Daniels instructions (No I haven't given any instructions, but I can't get on ICQ atm
. I'm pretty sure you know what's most important though.)
Boris (not BorisV) able to sub today. I grabbed him for Lyko, if he get failure for subbing, well, we`ll see.
k changed my mind again
1)-russia sells right to monopolise of all 7 cot to whoever is wiling to pay for it
minimum bid for 7monopolise is 5000g a session , whover bids highest gain rights to it for a session, if somebody is really annoyng to the 1 with this right he will get a embargo for the session
2)another note
a-any nation cought funding or rebelklling i a nation that is atwar with russia will be embargod for 5years or duration of war (wichever is longest)
b- any nation threatening to russia because of the above will be embargod for 10years and considert a enemy of russia
c- any nation invading russia in a attempt to steal cots will be banned for life and hunter down no matter the cost
for 2500gold a session you get immunity to a embargo for that session even if you do the above(2-a/2-b only )
1)-russia sells right to monopolise of all 7 cot to whoever is wiling to pay for it
minimum bid for 7monopolise is 5000g a session , whover bids highest gain rights to it for a session, if somebody is really annoyng to the 1 with this right he will get a embargo for the session
2)another note
a-any nation cought funding or rebelklling i a nation that is atwar with russia will be embargod for 5years or duration of war (wichever is longest)
b- any nation threatening to russia because of the above will be embargod for 10years and considert a enemy of russia
c- any nation invading russia in a attempt to steal cots will be banned for life and hunter down no matter the cost
for 2500gold a session you get immunity to a embargo for that session even if you do the above(2-a/2-b only )
I would say that this proves it. Austria and his brainwashed minions are the source of evil on earth.
well, in first global war, where Venice took a part, Sweden attacked some of our ships and provinces for intercepting England fleet. At second global war Sweden came to Med to break our blockade of OE.
So this time we came to Sweden to kill the source of evilness in the world. At the current global war Sweden decided to embargo us. Which leads that they should lose their insane number of CoTs to let the income be spread out better for the world.
Several sessions ago Sweden was going to present gift to Venice as CoT (which was hardly needed for us), but despite some spamming in game, it never happened. Though Venice would be happy with stable minor CoT even. A session after that Zanzibar was owned by England and it was offered to take from them. No more friendly gift offers followed, including when Sweden retook Zanzibar.
So this time we came to Sweden to kill the source of evilness in the world. At the current global war Sweden decided to embargo us. Which leads that they should lose their insane number of CoTs to let the income be spread out better for the world.
Several sessions ago Sweden was going to present gift to Venice as CoT (which was hardly needed for us), but despite some spamming in game, it never happened. Though Venice would be happy with stable minor CoT even. A session after that Zanzibar was owned by England and it was offered to take from them. No more friendly gift offers followed, including when Sweden retook Zanzibar.
Last edited:
Tonioz said:please add cannons and ships too for special perverted minds
Yep, Dan actually wanted me to kill a few more ships in a war several sessions ago, just so that he could get even more MT. And pirate spamming as well.
Tonioz said:
England fully supports this, indeed we have been embargoed by Sweden (and Brandenburg) even longer than Venice has.
another subject
At the beginning of the session Daniel claimed Lyko didn`t consult him for rule change, so it is no valid. Which makes nonsense to continue playing. After it was promised to punish any fake war exploiter, the session take place.
Now the questions are
- is the rule staying ?
- if is the rule not staying, who will continue campaign ? I definetely resign at this case surely at least. I have no fun to waste the time, so everybody could exploit to MT 4,5 with their allies.
- if players are for the rule, and Daniel is strictly against, it is either end of the campaign or Lyko becoming single GM
At the beginning of the session Daniel claimed Lyko didn`t consult him for rule change, so it is no valid. Which makes nonsense to continue playing. After it was promised to punish any fake war exploiter, the session take place.
Now the questions are
- is the rule staying ?
- if is the rule not staying, who will continue campaign ? I definetely resign at this case surely at least. I have no fun to waste the time, so everybody could exploit to MT 4,5 with their allies.
- if players are for the rule, and Daniel is strictly against, it is either end of the campaign or Lyko becoming single GM
Lyko, good session for Spain, think I've covered everything in my aar, but if you wanna know something else just ask, was a good, fun session today
Pfff, well, acordingly to FAL, in eu3, spies' actions should include an action that grants you the oportunity to raise your enemies' inflation.
Now, tell me, wouldnt that be EVIL in MP mode? Major inflation heavens. The joy!
Now, tell me, wouldnt that be EVIL in MP mode? Major inflation heavens. The joy!
ok back from the cruise.. read all this yesterday and was going to respond but the damn keyboard was moving to much so i decided to take a computer free day
Ok to fix some things. I thought i had spoken to daniel when he made his little mistake about getting a rule for it. and from what i've rememberd i promised to write the rule until the next session. thus thinking that we must have come to an agreement. but it seems i've must have had an dream instead about it or something
anyway i want the rule as i hate exploits and i hate cheating. I rarly do both. But games are played differently from person to person. Others cheat others don't.
So then we'll do a democratic poll of this as it seems that both of the GM's are in dissagreement( havn't talked to daniel yet, but from what tonios say, we are in dissagrement )
Of course i'll have to talk to Daniel first but in the mean while, if we both do not agree with eachothers, u can stat ur views on this. If it should be allowed to exploit the MT system with fake wars etc... or not.
Those that do not say anything will not be able to say anything about the decision that will be made on this.
Ok to fix some things. I thought i had spoken to daniel when he made his little mistake about getting a rule for it. and from what i've rememberd i promised to write the rule until the next session. thus thinking that we must have come to an agreement. but it seems i've must have had an dream instead about it or something
anyway i want the rule as i hate exploits and i hate cheating. I rarly do both. But games are played differently from person to person. Others cheat others don't.
So then we'll do a democratic poll of this as it seems that both of the GM's are in dissagreement( havn't talked to daniel yet, but from what tonios say, we are in dissagrement
)Of course i'll have to talk to Daniel first but in the mean while, if we both do not agree with eachothers, u can stat ur views on this. If it should be allowed to exploit the MT system with fake wars etc... or not.
Those that do not say anything will not be able to say anything about the decision that will be made on this.