Masochist is more appropriate?Sadist.
I'll be going with the Mande
Its the name of the religion in Mali.Who and where is Mande?
You don't need to risk a game over though, once you have a male somewhere in your dynasty you are good to go.
With concubines the problem becomes you can only have one child, which can be problematic. With seduction, you can keep producing children forever, and if one gets genius or strong, you then legitimize him. I think you can even legitimize the girls and matri marry them, so that they will have boys that can inherit if something goes wrong.
If your legitimized heir dies, you can just quickly legitimize another.
You don't need to risk a game over though, once you have a male somewhere in your dynasty you are good to go.
With concubines the problem becomes you can only have one child, which can be problematic. With seduction, you can keep producing children forever, and if one gets genius or strong, you then legitimize him. I think you can even legitimize the girls and matri marry them, so that they will have boys that can inherit if something goes wrong.
If your legitimized heir dies, you can just quickly legitimize another.
How do you plan to get a steady flow of prestige? Your possibilities of conquest qnd tributary war are very limited.
Do you plan on investing in ships? Do you can raid overseas as an West African?
I still recommend a Norse ruler for this WC. You just have so many more possibilities to conquer, raid and make tributaries. In the East there are many easy tribal targets and beyond there are the hordes which provide good land. (Instant religion and culture shift). In the West you easy conquer Ireland than Scotland and later the rest of the British island.
With West African you face very early the Umayyads (how do you plan to deal with them?) and just can expand into North Africa.