Any of you found out how to make a new transport plane?
Or are we stuck with the transport plane we get from start?
Or are we stuck with the transport plane we get from start?
- 4
- 1
Transport plane?
- Thread starter Bambilambi
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Stuck with default transport plane. They said it it would most likely cause to many issues if we could design them. But at least they are cheaper to make now.
- 5
>Litteraly the air expansion
>Can't unf*** the transport aircraft (range too short for most operations)
PDX why are you like this?
>Can't unf*** the transport aircraft (range too short for most operations)
PDX why are you like this?
- 6
- 2
- 2
wtf they introduce a plane designer but you cant design a simlpe transport plane that has the range of a fighter II.
Paradox fix this!
Paradox fix this!
- 6
- 1
- 1
They can, but transports are already too strong and they fear from more abusing
- 2
- 1
Where are they too strong.
Especially in the remote areas were they would be useful they often lack the range to be effective.
If i invest in transport planes they should have a benefit.
Especially in the remote areas were they would be useful they often lack the range to be effective.
If i invest in transport planes they should have a benefit.
- 4
You really want to let people paradrop into Paris from Warsaw? It'd not only totally break the AI, it'd be a massive pain in mp and get banned anyways.
- 2
- 2
- 1
Yeah i want be able to do it. Why not?
I can build superheavy tanks superheavy BB and guided missles with 11000km range.
So why no improved transport planes?
Also i dont care about MP there are banned severals things allready
- 3
- 2
If in the game, in theory, you can create a transport aircraft with a long range and a large payload. Why then were light airborne armored vehicles not added (airborne light tanks, airborne self-propelled guns, airborne armored personnel carriers)
You can add light tanks as recon to paratrooperdivisions and drop them.
- 2
- 1
I know it very well. I'm talking about mechanized airborne units. Which major countries tried to mechanize:
- Germany: created a heavy glider Me.321 that could transport a medium tank
- USSR: T-37A - T-38, T-40 light tanks used by the Airborne Forces, T-20 Komsomolets, Universal Carrier, OSA-76 experimental self-propelled guns for the Airborne Forces
- Britain: Tetrarch, Universal Carrier
- USA: M22 Locust and experimental armored personnel carrier for the Airborne Forces (I don’t remember the exact designation)
I hoping that the smaller air zones in South East Asia and other areas outside Europe will make transport planes more viable. The limited range used to mean they couldn't be used to supply units in Burma and Central Africa, even though those were the areas where air supply was most effective in real life.
But they never achieved mechanized airborne units. Only some light armour or only jeeps for support.
So just gonna outright ignore the 'utterly break the AI' part, huh? Don't come complaining to the devs with "why is half the AI's army just sitting near the capital not doing anything while fighting a desperate war!?" or "why did my ally suddenly capitulate out of nowhere?!" because the answer would be "because the USSR can drop into Paris from their starting borders and the AI is trying to deal with it and can't because that's an insane thing for even a player to always be prepared for".
- 2
Sure i ignore it. It is the least of my problems.
I can break the AI with only subs III or IV.
With 15km/h light tank divisions.
With strats III.
etc. pp
So we will also delete all these to not upset the AI?
By the way state AA heavily crippels paratroopers. So AI and players should be fine with 2-3 divisions in a capital city with AA.
- 1