unorthodoxt said:I think there should be an event that is a direct result of Sudentenland and Beck as the Chief of Staff. Because he got replaced over some arguements about that event. And they have events for Blomberg and Fritsch, so why not Beck?
Also if the Czechs decide not to cede Sudentenland perhaps we have the coup Beck planned with Halder, Witzleben, Brockendorf, Stulpfnagel, Hoeppner, von Helldorf, Hans Gisevius, Oster, Canaris, Hammerstein–Equord, Treskow and Goerdeler.
Problem is, I don't know whether much of a coup was actually planned for the Munich situation. The information that we have was largely generated by a bunch of army staff trying to save their own necks at nuremburg... would it have really worked?
Actually, I'd agree that a Japanese Internement Act would be worthwhile (I believe that prohibitions against ethnic cleansing were directed at a single block of nations---if Stalin can purge and Japan can massacre, USA can intern. It's only the Axis powers who must be whitewashed (through laws in those countries, I believe)
If the UK doesn't liberate India, it loses all cores on those territories and gets dissent in them all. India's starting leadership includes Mohandas Gandhi--who dies and creates another civil war--Pakistan vs India.
Oh yeah, there should be more high dissent results in changes of governments events.
I second the call for Axis vs. Republican Spain war. If the Allies support Spain, it might well join the Allies in 1940 (and try to intervene against disaster in France--which might make a difference). If the Commintern supports Spain and the allies don't, Spain should join the Commintern--who knows how that could turn out...