Of course it is good to get the raw info on what the game code reads. However, you should also have much more respect for anybody's in-game recordings.
And that was the situation with your earlier mention of my claim that radar was useless - which was a very detailed record over many months of developing radar techs and building up radar levels but the many battles witnessed proved that radar was still useless because it did not turn on the majority of the time. Your earlier statement about that is very false (below).
You exaggerate to the point of deliberate untruth with writing "pretty much all of the AoD forum come there and tell you that it worked very well indeed" . One person submitted a sceen shot of radar working... and that started my investigation and proper reporting (which I was commended on by others) just how useless radar is - and most of the time it does not work.
Again, you should show much more respect for my recordings than your disharmonious tone trying to paint me with your negative intention.
Hahaha, "respect" has absolutely
nothing to do here.
I've simply and honestly expressed my doubts about your opinions, since 1) you're not an AoD developer and 2) you've already demonstrated an iffy knowledge at best about AoD mechanics before. Therefore, it makes only sense to me to look for a more affordable opinion on the matter (like Zsar's one, whom I thank again for the input).
If you think that anybody who simply
disagrees with you
disrespects you, well... that's your problem, not mine or anybody else's.
(also, two quick quotes to show the way you approached the matter. The first one comes very early in that thread)
Land radar does not modifiy air combat
(...)
And, after many people showed you the contrary (I wrote "pretty much all the forum" because actually it was pretty much the whole of the active user base of the AoD forum at that time), that's your new view on the topic:
That just for truth's sake. I'm tiring of this, though. Do, think and write what you want; I don't care anymore. It might be helpful, however, to quote a post by PB-DK from that very thread to show that somebody else felt that the "negative intention" you wrote about lies probably elsewhere.
View attachment 121559
this is what you get when you do not read the manual,have patience or are rude;
and if you bothered asking nicely i would have told you i was busy and would have gotten all the information you wanted and given answers to everything else you have asked when i had time, now i dont have any more time to waste on ungrateful people today, so have a nice evening c666 and maybe we can talk again later
View attachment 121559
