There, I said it.
It's complete garbage.
Unlike EU4 AE, you can't play around it by shifting the focus of your warmongering.
What's more it punishes you for indulging in CK2's unique selling point; the inheritance game. (Inherit Duchy of Normandy? here have 20% threat)
Am I supposed to just ignore threat and keep expanding, until the entire map is allied against me? That isn't fun, it's just dumb.
Or am I supposed to play at speed 5 and wait 15 years for my threat to clear?
Then play super inefficiently, slowing my expansion to a snails pace?
I'm an Emperor; why give me the capability to absorb Kingdoms, if I can't actually do it without being hamstrung by the threat system?
Wouldn't it be better to simply eliminate the Emperor title tier?
You'd slow expansion (no more invite&land Kingdom claimants), and make large realms far less stable (smaller de jure primary title, and complicated harmonisation of inheritance laws for usurped Kingdoms.)
It's complete garbage.
Unlike EU4 AE, you can't play around it by shifting the focus of your warmongering.
What's more it punishes you for indulging in CK2's unique selling point; the inheritance game. (Inherit Duchy of Normandy? here have 20% threat)
Am I supposed to just ignore threat and keep expanding, until the entire map is allied against me? That isn't fun, it's just dumb.
Or am I supposed to play at speed 5 and wait 15 years for my threat to clear?
Then play super inefficiently, slowing my expansion to a snails pace?
I'm an Emperor; why give me the capability to absorb Kingdoms, if I can't actually do it without being hamstrung by the threat system?
Wouldn't it be better to simply eliminate the Emperor title tier?
You'd slow expansion (no more invite&land Kingdom claimants), and make large realms far less stable (smaller de jure primary title, and complicated harmonisation of inheritance laws for usurped Kingdoms.)
- 13
- 1