• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Mike6979

Major
97 Badges
Apr 15, 2008
702
108
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Cities: Skylines - After Dark
  • Europa Universalis IV: Pre-order
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Sengoku
  • Semper Fi
  • Europa Universalis: Rome
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Hearts of Iron III: Their Finest Hour
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • For the Motherland
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • A Game of Dwarves
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Sunset Invasion
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Divine Wind
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Tyranny - Tales from the Tiers
  • Crusader Kings II: Horse Lords
  • Stellaris: Digital Anniversary Edition
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Together for Victory
  • Crusader Kings II: Conclave
  • Cities: Skylines - Natural Disasters
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Crusader Kings II: Reapers Due
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Tyranny: Archon Edition
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Pillars of Eternity
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Pride of Nations
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Crusader Kings II: Holy Knight (pre-order)
  • Hearts of Iron 4: Arms Against Tyranny
  • 500k Club
  • Cities: Skylines - Mass Transit
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mandate of Heaven
  • Victoria 2
  • March of the Eagles
Somewhat subjective, but Lysimachus is probably too old at game start. It is generally accepted that he was born in 355 or 356, which makes him about 5 years to old in game.

Next, you have Eurydike(119) and Agathocles(147) reversed in age. Eurydike was the eldest born around 438 while Agathocles was the middle child born around 440.

You have Adeia(245) married to (240) while she was married to Lysimachus' brother who is (244).

Alexandros(263) is part of the family but not listed as Lysimachus' son, he should have (41) father but no listed mother.

Also, in every start I get two extra sons for Lysimachus who did not exist, they are not in the Thrake setup file, are they just random generated?
 
  • 2
Reactions:
Upvote 0
I am going to add a few non-Thrake bugs to this thread.

Corinth is incorrectly owned by Cassander at game start. It should either be a free city or a loose feudatory of Ptolemy. It was taken by Demetrias in 304bc and the Antigonids held on to the city until the Romans beat Philip V.

I can not get the Lysimachus/Amastris marriage event to fire. Anyone have any ideas on this?
 
  • 1
Reactions:
A very important Bug is missing:

Thrace starts allied with Macedon.

But historically, Lysimachos remined neutral and sided with Cassander only in 302 BC. Thrace should have an event like Egypt and Seleukids demanding land in exchange for peace form Antigonids.

If Antigonus agrees, Thrace should get all Phrygian land in the Asia and Bithynia regions (the area that Lysimachos conquered historically).

Somewhat subjective, but Lysimachus is probably too old at game start. It is generally accepted that he was born in 355 or 356, which makes him about 5 years to old in game.
Is it? All primary sources state he died in 281 BC at the age of 80 (born about 361 BC) OR 70 (born about 351 BC). The 355 or 356 dates are a speculation by modern historians who assume both numbers are rounded up OR down and he was actually about 75 years old.

You have Adeia(245) married to (240) while she was married to Lysimachus' brother who is (244).
In addition to this, she should probably be much younger (25 to 35).

Reason: It’s known that she had children with Autolykos. Their names and precise number is unknown. With the current age (50 at start) the only way would be scripting some made-up characters as their children. But if she’s made younger, they could get children the natural way after the start date. As her historical birth year is unknown, there’s nothing wrong with making it whatever is best for gameplay.

Alexandros(263) is part of the family but not listed as Lysimachus' son, he should have (41) father but no listed mother.
But why no mother? She is known, her name was Macris, an Odryisan concubine (similar to Ptolemy’s children with Thais). She should probably have high Charisma and could be rival with Nikaia.

Also, in every start I get two extra sons for Lysimachus who did not exist, they are not in the Thrake setup file, are they just random generated?
They are random, because there are not enough family members (Lysimachos himself, 2 sons and 1 brother). The game spawns additional ones in order to reach the necessary number.

There’s a similar problem with the Attlids if Pergamon gets released. We have proposed a solution for them and in this case it should be similar.

These three living male family members are currently absent and should be added to make the game stop spawning random ones:

The descendants of Lysimachos’ older brother Alkimachus (who has apparently died before 319 BC) are also missing: his sons Alkimachos jr, and Philippos and his grandson Lysippus.

  • Alkimachus. Perhaps he should have the Benefactor or Founder trait (because he was honoured in some inscriptions)?
  • Lysippus was apparently later a diplomat on the island of Ios. He was probably still a child in 450 AVC, but could have high charisma to reflect his future career.
  • Nothing is known about Philipp except his name. Probably low to medium stats, no exceptional traits.

In addition to the living, 5 dead family members should be added as well. (In order to establish an in-game relationship between the living ones and explain the origin of the Surname Alkimachid). Arguably, they all can be in Macedon as they died before Lysimachos proclamed himself an independent ruler.

Brothers of Lysimachos:
  • Alkimachos, the oldest brother (judging by his career, decent Charisma, Civic and Martial stats, some positive traits). He seems to have died some when between 334 BC (last mentioned as alive) and about 319 BC.
  • Philippos, the youngest of 4 brothers. Died about 328 BC of exhaustion in Sogdiana.

Their parents:
  • Agathocles. He should have silver-tongued and Shrewd traits because he rose to prominence by flattering and befriending Philipp II
  • Arsinoe. The only thing known about her is that she was Thessalian.

Grandfather of Lysimachos and his brothers, Father of Agathocles and namesake of the Alkimachid family:
  • Alkimachos, a low-born thessalian peasant.

Obviously all the men should have Thessalian culture and the bloodline trait.
 
  • 1Like
  • 1
Reactions:
Thanks for the excellent reply. I listed birth year as 355 as Pauly-Wissowa and Brittanica have that year now.

I did not list Macris as I did not want Paradox to overlook this stuff because of too much detail, try to make it as easy as possible for them.

I think that Paradox starts Thrake and Makedonia in alliance to ward off a quick Makedonian war against Thrake at game start. Keeps things on track.

Thanks for confirming the extra kids were random, I was not sure about that.
 
Pauly-Wissowa and Brittanica have that year now.
His Wikipedia entry has c. 360 BC and Ancient History Encyclopedia 361 BC.

I think that Paradox starts Thrake and Makedonia in alliance to ward off a quick Makedonian war against Thrake at game start. Keeps things on track.
More likely they just didn’t fix it. Remember that originally both Macedon and Thrace were guaranteed by Egypt and the Seleukids.

There is a general problem of Diadochi states fighting minors instead of fighting each other.

But the discussion on how to fix this problem is here.
 
Last edited:
w1ikipedia is largely useless.
What about the Sources they use? :
  1. The Pimlico Dictionary Of Classical Civilizations: "Lysimachus (360–281 BC), one of the close companions of Alexander the Great, assumed the title of king in 305 BC"
  2. ^ The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Coinage: "Lysimachus (c. 360–281 B.C.), another diadoch and a past bodyguard of Alexander, received the greater part of Asia Minor."
And
Traver, Andrew G. (2002). From Polis to Empire, the Ancient World, C. 800 B.C.-A.D. 500: A Biographical Dictionary
 
The Oxford Handbook of Coinage is an excellent book for what it is but it is not trying to push historical thought forward, it is a book on historical coinage only.

Pimlico dictionary I have never read. Cannot comment.

Andrew Traver's work is a high school level just using old sources to put together a new book, there is virtually no work by Mr Traver in the book.
It is fine for high school level to learn about historical figures but not a research level book.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
Age of Lysimachos at death according to ancient authors:
  • Lucian or Pseudo-Lucian (quoting Hieronymos of Caria) states he was 80 (born ca.361 BC) and Antigonus was 81 in 301 BC (born ca. 382 BC, same as in the game). Lucian also states that Agathocles of Syracuse was 90 when he dies in 289 BC (born 379 BC).
  • Justinus states that Lysimachos was 74 (born ca. 355 BC) while Seleucus was 77 (ca. 358 BC).
  • Appian states that Lysimachos was 70 (born ca. 351 BC) while Seleucus was 73 (ca. 354 BC).
Info on the trustworthiness of these sources:
  • Lysimachus became royal bodyguard (Somatophylax) during the reign of Philipp II, that means not later than 336 BC. This makes the age provided by Appian unlikely as it would mean Lysimachus would have been very young (not older than 15).
  • Hieronymus is the only contemporary who knew Antigonus and Lysimachus personally. Appian, Lucian and Justin lived centuries later.
However, both Justinus and Appian agree that Seleukos was 3 years older than Lysimachos, while he is currently 3 years younger in the game.
 
There was another problem as well, maybe you already know about it. Roman Republic dating is not reliable before ~280bc. After 280 or so it is correlated by historians but before then not so much. This is a problem in Appian, Livius, Justin etc.
 
There was another problem as well, maybe you already know about it. Roman Republic dating is not reliable before ~280bc. After 280 or so it is correlated by historians but before then not so much. This is a problem in Appian, Livius, Justin etc.
True, but how is that related to this discussion? This matters only for determining when events happened in Rome and Italy.

None of the sources uses AVC or consular year, they all just say is how old Lysimachos was when he died. Are you suggesting that the Battle of Corupedium was NOT in early 281 BC? But The Greeks used their own chronology based on Olympic games, and the Seleukids had the Impeiral Calendar starting in 312 BCE.
 
It is related to this discussion because essentially nothing of Polybius regarding the successors has survived, and he is our BEST known Greek author of the time. Most of what we know about the successors comes from Romans who hopefully read older Greek sources.
There is a grand total of one (1) book that talks about Antigonus as a primary character from the time, and I have read it and it is not a good book.

The Seleukid calendar could be off by one year as well, it could be 311. The 4th century in the eastern Med is an historians black hole.
 
It is related to this discussion because essentially nothing of Polybius regarding the successors has survived, and he is our BEST known Greek author of the time. Most of what we know about the successors comes from Romans who hopefully read older Greek sources.
There is a grand total of one (1) book that talks about Antigonus as a primary character from the time, and I have read it and it is not a good book.
But if you dismiss these few sources, you have nothing. The alternative to using them would be making stuff up.

The Seleukid calendar could be off by one year as well, it could be 311.
The Seleukid calendar was used both by Macedonians who celebrated New Year in autumn 312 BCE and Babylonians who did it on April 3 311 BC.
That means depending on the version used, the years are off by half a year, but it's less confusing than the Roman claendar before Caesar.