{{I like how we whites are now basicaly equal to the devil for some reason... }}
{{I like how we whites are now basicaly equal to the devil for some reason... }}
{{Nonononono, I need to keep my guard up, lest I reveal my terrible terrible secret...}}{{With di Capponi still around (somewhere), is that such a bad thing?
Come on. Embrase the madness. You know you want to.}}
{{Maybe to the Blues, I think the Reds still get along better with the Whites, but we'll have to see how it turns out at the meeting.}}{{I like how we whites are now basicaly equal to the devil for some reason... }}
Senator Duilius Arrius:
*Duilius rolls his eyes at Dooley's outburst.*
"I have issue with those who regard the Church higher than the Augustus, not God. There is a difference between the men who claim to speak for the Lord and the Lord Himself. Priests can be corrupt like any other man. The Church has become too greedy, too powerful. They must be taught to kneel to the royal family, the people who are protecting the Imperium's citizens. I have seen people suffer and die while the Church does nothing to aid them... and I have seen the royal family's efforts to help our people.
Dooley, I listen to your opinion because you are a Senator, not because you claim to be a holy man.
{{Be safe, @Leandor }}
Senator Duilius Arrius:
"The Church is a rotting limb, slowly killing the rest of the Imperium. They have had this much wealth and power for years, and yet we still have citizens who follow the Xenoi's gods. Tell me Senator Azizid, is that the Church's failing, or God's? They have had years to save our people, and no results. Perhaps making the Church humble again will show them that we need results, not just more promises while they horde the Imperium's wealth. The priests do not need riches to spread their message to the masses.
Dooley, you are a Senator. We serve the Augustus and the royal family. We serve Our Lord. We do not serve the Church."
{{As someone who didn't watch Silence of the Lambs, Alexius reminds me more of Roose Bolton }}
Senator Nikephoros II Salamis:
*Nikephoros doesn't even wash his hands while watching the events unfolding. He frowns, even his social incompetence forgotten.*
Careful, Senators Colombo and Arrius. The church and its men are still the LORD's envoys, and still His men. Our demes had some... trouble not so long ago, let's not let it seem like we are problematic. Let us not completely ignore the opportunity to ally with the Whites if the Reds do not cooperate- some of them hate us more than some of the Whites, from what my father told me. He also told me that his father, Herakleios Salamis who was poisoned on the Senate floor, had respect for the new generation of the White demes, even as his rivals.
*He turns his gaze towards Alexius*
Senator Colombo, you speak as if your policies will become the Blue Deme's undebatable policies if we elect you as speaker. You even misspoke and called the position "leader" once... It is not so. You shall be the speaker, nothing else. I agree with Bishop Dooley, you seem like you have a mind for cunning, however there are some points on which I disagree with you- despite your hate for them, we cannot overlook an opportunity to ally with the Whites. We must also enact the administrative reform- the Imperium needs it in these times of crisis. And lastly, I am not sure that increasing our ship's durability should be the focus of our demes... It, and any of your policies, should be debatable no matter what- being the speaker does not make one higher in position than any member of his demes. You will speak, and promote, what the faction as a whole decides, even if you disagree. Will you do this thing as our speaker, or will you usurp a nonexistent position of leadership?
{{ This isn't modern Western country founded on serpation of powers and other ideas from Enlightenment; in Byzantium relations between the Church and the throne are sometimes described with a term "caesaropapism":Senator Duilius Arrius:
Dooley, you are a Senator. We serve the Augustus and the royal family. We serve Our Lord. We do not serve the Church."
Tl;dr - serving God, Emperor and the Church is basically the same thing (huge simplification but more or less true) }}Caesaropapism /ˌsiːzəroʊˈpeɪpɪzəm/ is the idea of combining the power of secular government with the religious power, or making it superior to the spiritual authority of the Church; especially concerning the connection of the Church with government. The term caesaropapism (Cäseropapismus) may first have been coined by Justus Henning Böhmer, and was later defined by Max Weber as "a secular, caesaropapist ruler... exercises supreme authority in ecclesiastic matters by virtue of his autonomous legitimacy". According to Weber's political sociology, caesaropapism entails "the complete subordination of priests to secular power."
In its extreme form, caesaropapism is a political theory in which the head of state, notably the Emperor ('Caesar', by extension an 'equal' King), is also the supreme head of the church ('papa', pope or analogous religious leader). In this form, it inverts theocracy (or hierocracy in Weber) in which institutions of the Church control the state. However, both Caesaropapism and Theocracy are systems in which there is no Separation of Church and State and the two form parts of a single power structure.
Caesaropapism's chief example is the authority the Byzantine (East Roman) Emperors had over the Church of Constantinople or Eastern Christian Church from the 330 consecration of Constantinople through the tenth century. The Byzantine Emperor would typically protect the Eastern Church and manage its administration by presiding over Ecumenical Councils and appointing Patriarchs and setting territorial boundaries for their jurisdiction. The Emperor exercised a strong control over the ecclesiastical hierarchy, and the Patriarch of Constantinople could not hold office if he did not have the Emperor's approval. Eastern men like St. John Chrysostom, Patriarch of Constantinople and St. Athanasius, Patriarch of Alexandria, strongly opposed imperial control over the Church, as did Western theologians like St. Hilary and Hosius, Bishop of Córdoba. Such Emperors as Basiliscus, Zeno, Justinian I, Heraclius, and Constans II published several strictly ecclesiastical edicts either on their own without the mediation of church councils, or they exercised their own political influence on the councils to issue the edicts.
However, John Meyendorff has stated: "Caesaropapism ... never became an accepted principle in Byzantium." Several saints resisted the imperial power as a consequence of their witness to orthodoxy, such as Maximus the Confessor. In addition, at several occasions imperial decrees had to be withdrawn as the people of the Church, both lay people, monks and priests, refused to accept inventions at variance with the Church's customs and beliefs. These events show that the power over the Church really was in the hands of the Church itself – not in the emperor.
{{Tl;dr - serving God, Emperor and the Church is basically the same thing (huge simplification but more or less true) }}
Randon question then: what is Saint Markos the saint of? People pray to specific saints for specific things, right? Is Saint Markos the saint of Romans?}}
{{Do we even have enough ADM points to raise our stability that high?}}
roman_ideas = {
start = {
core_creation = -0.25
army_tradition = 1
}
bonus = {
global_autonomy = -0.10
}
saint_markos = {
global_missionary_strength = 0.02
tolerance_heretic = -2
tolerance_heathen = -2
}
sacred_palace = {
diplomatic_reputation = 1
advisor_pool = 1
}
angelikon = {
stability_cost_modifier = -0.10
global_tax_modifier = 0.05
}
tagmata = {
discipline = 0.05
army_tradition_decay = -0.01
}
rom_mare_nostrum = {
naval_morale = 0.10
global_trade_income_modifier = 0.10
}
great_purge = {
culture_conversion_cost = -0.50
tolerance_heretic = -2
tolerance_heathen = -2
}
sine_fine = {
fabricate_claims_time = -0.25
may_explore = yes
}