Almost 50 pages and CM hasn't even played yet
Well yeah, but how many AARs have half a dozen dev diaries?
Almost 50 pages and CM hasn't even played yet
Almost 50 pages and CM hasn't even played yet
Well yeah, but how many AARs have half a dozen dev diaries?
Or perhaps, if I dare say it, Rev. Byzantium?
Not as terrifying as having to stand against revolutionary Xenoi Xolai.
I just realized that if Pisa somehow (despite having a faster tech speed than their overlords until they get their tech cost idea rolling) westernizes, as the AI is wont to do if they're not western in 1.8, they could break free of the aztecs and thus be free for annexation.
Or the previous Angelos.well, we vote for the military angelos, the diplomatic angelos, or the administrative angelos
The corruption in the Imperium would clearly beThis is assuming we're not a TPM with only Crete and Malta to our name by the end of the game.
I'd like to see, if we are successful, some good model of corruption that will fester the longer we are prosperous and powerful.I saw the 'high' 'medium' 'low' and 'no' corruption triggers in the dev diaries, but I don't know how Czoklet is planning on implementing them.
This is assuming we're not a TPM with only Crete and Malta to our name by the end of the game.
I'd like to see, if we are successful, some good model of corruption that will fester the longer we are prosperous and powerful.I saw the 'high' 'medium' 'low' and 'no' corruption triggers in the dev diaries, but I don't know how Czoklet is planning on implementing them.
Since there has been less than twelve votes for Quantity, it means it's not binding, right ?
Article 24 - Quorum
1. For the vote to be valid, a quorum is necessary, which exists when at least half of the Senators have presented their position during the debate.
2. Qorum and current number of Senators is included in the annoucement of the Senate Session issued by the President of the Senate.
Article 25 - Simple majority and absolute majority
1. Simple majority (when there are more votes for than against) is required in all matters concerning advisory prerogatives of the Senate (resolution).
2. Absolute majority (when there are more votes for than the sum of votes against and abstentions) is required in all matters concerning legislative prerogatives of the Senate (senatus consultum).
Absolute majority (when there are more votes for than the sum of votes against and abstentions) is required in all matters concerning legislative prerogatives of the Senate (senatus consultum).
Abstention is a term in election procedure for when a participant in a vote either does not go to vote (on election day) or, in parliamentary procedure, is present during the vote, but does not cast a ballot.
It is binding - senatus consultum requires absolute majority and indeed quorum is equal to 12 Senators but majority =/= quorum:
Wait, it seems we have a problem with interpretation:
And according to wikipedia:
I guess it's a typo because what I wanted to say was that votes "against" and "abstain" don't count... but I also said that I'll obey the rules and "abstention" may mean also "not being present during voting". In which case there would be 9 votes for Reds' proposal, 7 votes "against" and "abstain" and 6 abstentions (only 18/24 Senators voted).
Crap.