![]()
Started as the Zoro Duke in 769, and this was 845, so 76 years. What you can't see is that he's in the middle of a decadence revolt, which is why I timed my bid for independence then. Here's what it looked like after the war finally ended (it didn't take 13 years, but this is just when I grabbed a screenshot):
![]()
I was actually spending time trying to gain more territory (Baghdad and Tigris) while inside the Empire, but the prospect of gaining independence *and* causing him to lose a decadence revolt was too tempting.
I had zero issues. He never got to legalism 3, and so wasn't able to get the religious revocation law. Planted my Chancellor in his capital (when he wasn't fabricating claims in Basra) to keep him happy, and was even on the council most of the time. The only thing he did was implement a Realm Peace the first time I went for Basra, but I waited out the 5 years and then took it easily. I had been going for another full-scale Zoro run, but then got bored and went on to do something else...
And you are wrong.
Emperor will start to revoke your titles when you are direct vassal and there is just a revoke law in empire. ( maybe u played an old version)
However before that time you should be able to imprison him or get enough money to defend yourself.
When u get marriages then you have non aggressive pact and you are safe.
How does conquering parts of an empire make it more stable? Sure their vassals will like them during an external war. However, if the emperor or caliph is regularly losing wars that leaves them depleted opening them up to faction revolts and increases their decadence (when Muslim) also reducing their ability to reduce decadence by landing family members.
sry didn`t notice your post.
You are right but the main key to destroy empire from outside it to kill levies not to conquer territory.
So when you do that you just hunt armies to deplete fast levies to 0 than sign white peace.
Last edited:
- 2
- 1