Javier (Pibe) said:
Daniel, if you want to be France, you have to act like France. Not like Brandy.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Daniel, if you want to be France, you have to act like France. Not like Brandy.
Zeitgeist said:
I do not agree! I want my power points calculated like last session!
Zeitgeist said:
Sometimes it is important to sell province during game. Why we have to wait for edits?
HALNY (HAL) said:
About exchanging provinces:
AUSTRIA,
I would like to rebuy gold provinces from you. Name your price.
We also have to ask editing of Romagna if fake wars will be banned.
admiral drake said:
It will be easier for Zeit if you check provinces id and write all edit in new syntax
HAL is content
HALNY (HAL) said:
Drake just told me that Zeit change only things on which we can spend prestige, so counting method is still the same (will change after next session).
Good than.
Last edited:
Javier (Pibe) said:
Who said I would ally AUS for the rest of the game? :wacko:
Has KJ ever been an ally of one nationn a whole game... :rofl:
HALNY (HAL) said:
My dear HAL. I will act exactly how I want. That is the main reason I do not play in those silly RP games where half of all posts are people complaining that the other players are not RP as they should
However, you can be sure that I will always play longterm.
But this thing with Pibe is just some fun noices. You see, in the two latest games where I have had the honor of encountering Pibe in EU MP he has had a decidedly stronger nation than me and proceeded to rape me. Probably when at school he as well fancied beating up on the smaller boys.
It is time for Pibe to feel the freezing chill creeping down his neck...
Tomorrow I will count and decide what to do with FRA. I then assume that the rules in post 1 are the actual ones.
Last edited:
HALNY (HAL) said:
France will fight the evil and stand up for the good!
Are you evil HAL?
Daniel A said:My dear HAL. I will act exactly how I want. That is the main reason I do not play in those silly RP games where half of all posts are people complaining that the other players are not RP as they should
However, you can be sure that I will always play longterm.
But this thing with Pibe is just some fun noices. You see, in the two latest games where I have had the honor of encountering Pibe in EU MP he has had a decidedly stronger nation than me and proceeded to rape me. Probably when at school he as well fancied beating up on the smaller boys.
It is time for Pibe to feel the freezing chill creeping down his neck...
we always attack the weakest as big countries, John and me played Spain and France respectively in that campaign, and we were planning to take Danish cots too. After we took English ones, Oe's ones (in process), Swedish ones and in the near future, NL's ones too because it was tradding without helping us. As you can see, you weren't the only one.
I like smaller boys
I'm camplaining you're taking it personal.
I have friends around, I'm feeling no freezing crap down my neck as you stated. However, France has better things to do than trying to reach Sweden.
Do whatever you want, i care a shit, seriously.
tag = Swe
prestige = 84
Power = 8
manpower 254 2
taxvalue 254 2
taxvalue 263 2
taxvalue 259 2
taxvalue 341 2
taxvalue 260 2
taxvalue 258 2
taxvalue 252 2
taxvalue 251 2
taxvalue 253 2
taxvalue 1469 2
taxvalue 381 2
taxvalue 256 2
taxvalue 255 2
taxvalue 1466 2
saving 4 power points.
prestige = 84
Power = 8
manpower 254 2
taxvalue 254 2
taxvalue 263 2
taxvalue 259 2
taxvalue 341 2
taxvalue 260 2
taxvalue 258 2
taxvalue 252 2
taxvalue 251 2
taxvalue 253 2
taxvalue 1469 2
taxvalue 381 2
taxvalue 256 2
taxvalue 255 2
taxvalue 1466 2
saving 4 power points.
I make my points this
(based upon the info Zeit's post 581 and on the wars described in it)
Power
+ 5 according to post 581
+ 2 for being DOWed twice by humans (SPA+AUS)
+ 1 for issuing DOW (SPA)
===
8
Prestige
+74.5 acc. to post 581
- 9 for War vs SPA (lost the war -2 and lost 7 provinces -7)
=====
65.5
How to use these points I will be back to later.
I believe that FRA also lost a war vs AUS early in the session (the 2 Swiss provinces lost? but I am not sure about that)
(based upon the info Zeit's post 581 and on the wars described in it)
Power
+ 5 according to post 581
+ 2 for being DOWed twice by humans (SPA+AUS)
+ 1 for issuing DOW (SPA)
===
8
Prestige
+74.5 acc. to post 581
- 9 for War vs SPA (lost the war -2 and lost 7 provinces -7)
=====
65.5
How to use these points I will be back to later.
I believe that FRA also lost a war vs AUS early in the session (the 2 Swiss provinces lost? but I am not sure about that)
AAR REWARDS
In a post some time ago our beloved hard-working GM asked us to really write those AARs that we get power points for. He would start checking if they really was written I think he said. Since the EU search motor is crap I cannot find that post so I do not remember when he wrote it. Well, anyhow the rule has been power points for AARs from the time that I entered the game.
I have gone through all posts made since the 4th of June, checking what AARs was written after the previous session and the ones written after the last one.
Session Jun 3rd
------------------
AAR written after the session by
Austria - KJ - post 409
Brandenburg - Daniel - post 482
OE - Tonioz+Dago - post 415, 493
SPA - HAL - post 465 (is this an AAR?)
SWE - Pibe - post 489
No AARs from Drake in ENG, Temu in Russia or Zeit (did Zeit play them?) in FRA. Since HAL writes so many posts and shows us so many nice paintings I am all for accepting post 465 as an AAR.
AFAIK none of those not writing an AAR protested that they had been given too many power points.
Session Jun 10th
------------------
AARs written by
AUS - John - post 573
BrB - Daniel - post 575
OE - Dago - post 579 (doutbful if this is an AAR)
From Drake, HAL, Pibe and Temu no AAR so far. But there is still time to write them. However, I find it remarkable to file an order for the use of power points for the nextcoming session before writing an AAR for the previous one.
==============
I say that either we skip the AAR reward rule or we all sincerely and honestly follow it.
If we keep it I suggest that anyone claiming to have written an AAR must put the words AAR at row 1 in the post.
If we keep it I also suggest that the AAR must be published latest at a chosen weekday (wednesday e.g.) so that Zeit, when it is time for him to run his program, can easily check the thread for AAR and know that the AARs he sees are the ones that shall be rewarded.
And finally, I do not find this rule about reward for AAR being any different from any other rule, for example the one prohibiting maptrading with the AI. True the AAR rule breach is a passive act but to trade maps with the AI is an active, but they both constitutes a clear breach of the rules benefitting the perpretator.
In a post some time ago our beloved hard-working GM asked us to really write those AARs that we get power points for. He would start checking if they really was written I think he said. Since the EU search motor is crap I cannot find that post so I do not remember when he wrote it. Well, anyhow the rule has been power points for AARs from the time that I entered the game.
I have gone through all posts made since the 4th of June, checking what AARs was written after the previous session and the ones written after the last one.
Session Jun 3rd
------------------
AAR written after the session by
Austria - KJ - post 409
Brandenburg - Daniel - post 482
OE - Tonioz+Dago - post 415, 493
SPA - HAL - post 465 (is this an AAR?)
SWE - Pibe - post 489
No AARs from Drake in ENG, Temu in Russia or Zeit (did Zeit play them?) in FRA. Since HAL writes so many posts and shows us so many nice paintings I am all for accepting post 465 as an AAR.
AFAIK none of those not writing an AAR protested that they had been given too many power points.
Session Jun 10th
------------------
AARs written by
AUS - John - post 573
BrB - Daniel - post 575
OE - Dago - post 579 (doutbful if this is an AAR)
From Drake, HAL, Pibe and Temu no AAR so far. But there is still time to write them. However, I find it remarkable to file an order for the use of power points for the nextcoming session before writing an AAR for the previous one.
==============
I say that either we skip the AAR reward rule or we all sincerely and honestly follow it.
If we keep it I suggest that anyone claiming to have written an AAR must put the words AAR at row 1 in the post.
If we keep it I also suggest that the AAR must be published latest at a chosen weekday (wednesday e.g.) so that Zeit, when it is time for him to run his program, can easily check the thread for AAR and know that the AARs he sees are the ones that shall be rewarded.
And finally, I do not find this rule about reward for AAR being any different from any other rule, for example the one prohibiting maptrading with the AI. True the AAR rule breach is a passive act but to trade maps with the AI is an active, but they both constitutes a clear breach of the rules benefitting the perpretator.
You're correct, I thought I had been up to date, but it seems even I as GM was failing in my AAR duty
I'll post a short one now, a little late, but here nonetheless
France 1600 - 1619
This session was marked by concerns over England's monopoly of the Far East. France first finished teching infra 5 and then began the process of strengthening her navy. Also during this time, Liguria + the rest of the Carribean was purchased from the Spanish (who proved to be treacherous next session under our regent). After several years, the French naval fleet was moved from Provence to the Atlantic, and war was declared with Austria against England. The English navy was quickly defeated and Austrian troops landed on the mainland (I had still not rebuilt the French army properly at that time, so French troops were still massing and loading, and did not dare to move my fleet away from outside London for fear of the English exploiting our navies). After most of her fleet was sunk, England wisely agreed to trade maps and gave up Flandern to Austria and Sicily and Messina to France, rather than drag out the war. Several years passed in peace, and then the Austrians invaded. The French bravely resisted, but due to the intervention of the lag monster and the skill of the Austrians, our army was annihilated at Artois. Only the mediocre leader Zeitgeist (3-3-3) remained to face the Austrians, led by von Wallenstein and since the main French army had been annihilated along with their apparently asleep leader (3-4-4), there was no hope of resisting further. France agreed to cede Switzerland to the Germanic hordes.
It seems that peace was a pipe dream though, since under our regent between 1619 and 1643, the Spanish attacked viciously, gaining much of the Carribean. The French, led by the brave Henri de la Tour d'Auvergne de Turenne rallied later and invaded Spain but were forced to WP by the intervention of the Austrians.
I'll post a short one now, a little late, but here nonetheless
France 1600 - 1619
This session was marked by concerns over England's monopoly of the Far East. France first finished teching infra 5 and then began the process of strengthening her navy. Also during this time, Liguria + the rest of the Carribean was purchased from the Spanish (who proved to be treacherous next session under our regent). After several years, the French naval fleet was moved from Provence to the Atlantic, and war was declared with Austria against England. The English navy was quickly defeated and Austrian troops landed on the mainland (I had still not rebuilt the French army properly at that time, so French troops were still massing and loading, and did not dare to move my fleet away from outside London for fear of the English exploiting our navies). After most of her fleet was sunk, England wisely agreed to trade maps and gave up Flandern to Austria and Sicily and Messina to France, rather than drag out the war. Several years passed in peace, and then the Austrians invaded. The French bravely resisted, but due to the intervention of the lag monster and the skill of the Austrians, our army was annihilated at Artois. Only the mediocre leader Zeitgeist (3-3-3) remained to face the Austrians, led by von Wallenstein and since the main French army had been annihilated along with their apparently asleep leader (3-4-4), there was no hope of resisting further. France agreed to cede Switzerland to the Germanic hordes.
It seems that peace was a pipe dream though, since under our regent between 1619 and 1643, the Spanish attacked viciously, gaining much of the Carribean. The French, led by the brave Henri de la Tour d'Auvergne de Turenne rallied later and invaded Spain but were forced to WP by the intervention of the Austrians.
i wil do aar later today kept forgetting about it earlyer
anyway prov edits
kutch is 541 id from ottos to england
flandern is 380 id from austria to england
anyway prov edits
kutch is 541 id from ottos to england
flandern is 380 id from austria to england