Think some climate was overlooked.

[Ragatokk]

Pretty sure this province should be arctic as well.

 

[Ragatokk]

Think you added some Scandinavian dessert too

 

[Peanutcat]

I'd say that and the one beneath

Think you added some Scandinavian dessert too

Literally unplayable

 

[Ragatokk]

France can now attack spain without being forced to fight in mountains.

 

[Peanutcat]

France can now attack spain without being forced to fight in mountains.

Just build a fort in a mountain province and they'll have to fight that

 

[hwoosh]

Also, Shetland and Orkney have been "No Winter" since basically the winters system was introduced, I think. @Trin Tragula

 

[Trin Tragula]

Yup. This was already properly reported in the bug forum and has been fixed internally

On top of what you've already mentioned the two new provinces that got split from Rovaniemi also had their province files swapped.

 

[Sunspawn]

Isn't Urgell a mountain province? IIRC it's at least a hills one, so not that horrible?

 

[Ragatokk]

Just build a fort in a mountain province and they'll have to fight that

I tried to show how you can completely avoid the mountains, look at the arrow on the picture.

 

[erkkijuusto]

Yup. This was already properly reported in the bug forum and has been fixed internally

On top of what you've already mentioned the two new provinces that got split from Rovaniemi also had their province files swapped.

Wouldn't it be more sensible to rename the province of Rovaniemi in Finland to Kemi, since during the 1400s the area today known as Rovaniemi was a home to less than 200 people. In real life, in the early 1400s, the town of Rovaniemi was transferred under the control of the parish of Kemi, thus administrated from the town of Kemi, where the diocese of Kemi was also located. I don't think naming a province after a small village makes sense when there's a bigger administrative centre nearby with more importance.

 

[Peanutcat]

I tried to show how you can completely avoid the mountains, look at the arrow on the picture.

But you can't? If you place a fort in a mountain province right next to the arrow they'll have to siege that fort before they move on. They can't leave the Zone of Influence of the fort. They'd have no choice but to walk to the fort.

The arrow is not a valid path if you have a fort next to it.

 

[Ragatokk]

But you can't? If you place a fort in a mountain province right next to the arrow they'll have to siege that fort before they move on. They can't leave the Zone of Influence of the fort. They'd have no choice but to walk to the fort.

The arrow is not a valid path if you have a fort next to it.

This would be true now, as they have stated that they have gone back from the new fort system yes...

 

[CplKatie]

But you can't? If you place a fort in a mountain province right next to the arrow they'll have to siege that fort before they move on. They can't leave the Zone of Influence of the fort. They'd have no choice but to walk to the fort.

The arrow is not a valid path if you have a fort next to it.

In the beta fort system theres very little in the way of blocking movement, you have to be a gigantic nation in Asia to benefit from the beta fort system.