• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

unmerged(5773)

First Lieutenant
Sep 16, 2001
269
0
Has anyone read Mommsen's History of Rome (Römische Geschichte)? If so, is it worth it? I know it's one of the classics, but many of the authors I have read consider many of his ideas to be wrong. Essentially, does its literary/historigraphical significance outway its obsolescence? Thanks.
 

Endre Fodstad

Colonel
23 Badges
Feb 6, 2000
1.142
3
Visit site
  • Sword of the Stars
  • Sword of the Stars II
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Stellaris: Digital Anniversary Edition
  • Stellaris: Necroids
  • Stellaris: Federations
  • Stellaris: Lithoids
  • Stellaris: Ancient Relics
  • Stellaris: Megacorp
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Stellaris: Humanoids Species Pack
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Stellaris
  • Pillars of Eternity
  • 500k Club
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
Both Gibbons and Mommsen are considered obselete, as all classics in sciences and humanities eventually become (Gibbons more so than Mommsen), but the fact remains that very few serious scholars today attempt the kind of mammoth work that those two lads performed. Other scholars have picked their theories and thoughts apart but have not always replaced their works with one of their own, so they're still interesting reading.

EF
 

unmerged(4643)

Sergeant
Jun 29, 2001
65
0
Visit site
Originally posted by Endre Fodstad
Both Gibbons and Mommsen are considered obselete, as all classics in sciences and humanities eventually become (Gibbons more so than Mommsen), but the fact remains that very few serious scholars today attempt the kind of mammoth work that those two lads performed. Other scholars have picked their theories and thoughts apart but have not always replaced their works with one of their own, so they're still interesting reading.

EF

True, Mommsen is obselete, however his work still stands as one of the fundamental works that promoted more study of Rome. I have read Mommsen's work and I find it very stimulating and that stimulation has sent me into finding works by many contemporary scholars (Snyde is just one example). However I tend to stay away from Michael Grant.

Vale,

Lucius Cornelius Sulla
www.novaroma.org