I think the Yugoslavia change, as a whole, was an entirely needed and really great inclusion in the latest update/dlc, and would like to first and foremost complement the team behind it on their great work. That being said, I do think the communist tree leaves a little to be desired (Which, according to the dev-diary, the just the result of not knowing how much they'd be allowed to add when developing the tree). While, yes, the Stalinist tree is completely useless and there is no reason to pick it instead of Yugoslav-Path, I find it kinda silly that Tito, the guy who wanted a Balkan Federation, can't form a united Balkan Federation but Bulgaria (who pulled out of the idea as soon as the Tito/Stalin Split occurred) can. I was expecting some ability to puppet the nations after you flip them (especially considering the nations changing colours to match Yugoslavia's dark-blue/purple scheme) but after a playthrough it seems like that isn't the case.
In addition, there is also the added level of fascist Yugoslavia not getting a claim on Thrace (I mean if you're going to claim C-Macedonia for the slavs, and also claim Bulgarians, you're gonna want to grab Thrace which was an object of Bulgarian desire). Maybe just renaming claims on Macedonia to claims on Northern Greece? This is a pretty small thing though, and I think the real problem is just Yugoslavian Communism being even worse now that the Western Path is so fleshed out and interesting.
In addition, there is also the added level of fascist Yugoslavia not getting a claim on Thrace (I mean if you're going to claim C-Macedonia for the slavs, and also claim Bulgarians, you're gonna want to grab Thrace which was an object of Bulgarian desire). Maybe just renaming claims on Macedonia to claims on Northern Greece? This is a pretty small thing though, and I think the real problem is just Yugoslavian Communism being even worse now that the Western Path is so fleshed out and interesting.
- 3
- 1