Actually, having done some reading on the subject over the course of the day, I think I can now say I'm au fait with it.
It is rather simple to grasp, I must say.
Actually, having done some reading on the subject over the course of the day, I think I can now say I'm au fait with it.
Seeing how many yellows liberals there seem to be is anyone else leaning towards orange.
I'm amazed people are able to be so sure about the whole thing before any manifestos have been released, I must say.
Oh I know o I refuse to make such a decision before the manifestos are out! But I'll admit I'm afraid of them being shut out!
What does this make the National Liberals I wonder? the Whites?
Tsk tsk, Ba'athists in Iraq invading Kuwait? An outstanding turn of events. Is there any chance Britain experimented with Air Cavalry divisions during the Suez Crisis? I've seen such wonderful demonstrations by the Yankee pigs in Indonesia, assuredly we can't let them have all the fun. The Iraqis don't even have jungle to hide in!
Too bad we have a pacifist govenment. Othewise we could have used super carriers loaded with state of the art jet fighters bombing the commie Iraqis back to the stoneage. Then followed up by air calvarly and marines to secure Kuwait. It would have secured peace much faster and had low British and civillian casualties. But now we end up ironically with a prolonged war and high numbers of civillian casualties due to a pacifist government.
I feel you are far too willing to send men to die at times, why should we get sucked into another Indonesia ....
To protect Kuwait from oppression? It is a difference between sending fighterbombers to bomb invading armies, and send forces as peacekeepers and protect the country than invading one and occupying it.
Perhaps we could call in our favors from Korea and get America to send her supercarriers to the Persian gulf! It's not too late to liquidate the Ba'ath menace!Too bad we have a pacifist govenment. Othewise we could have used super carriers loaded with state of the art jet fighters bombing the commie Iraqis back to the stoneage. Then followed up by air calvarly and marines to secure Kuwait. It would have secured peace much faster and had low British and civillian casualties. But now we end up ironically with a prolonged war and high numbers of civillian casualties due to a pacifist government.
Perhaps we could call in our favors from Korea and get America to send her supercarriers to the Persian gulf! It's not too late to liquidate the Ba'ath menace!
Methinks our government would much prefer to send more diplomatic insults. Or rely on the *almighty* United Nations for some silly half-hearted measures... worldwide embargo, perhaps? Ineffective in any case, i'm sure.
My current dilemma is thus: a lot of our party's support comes from the disaffected Labour supporters, and the supremacy of the Orange faction would but them in the lead. But an Orange victory would lead us too far to the left! Ideology vs power... which to choose, which to choose... .
They were already oppressed by the sheiks so what difference does it make if it's tyrant has red paint or not?
It seems it would not matter much for the people of Kuwait...
Unless of course we actually give a shit about the people of the middle east and undermine all these petty lords... with a responsible democratic counterpart.
Pan arabism doesn't have to an enemy if we didn't represent a terrible status quo.
Perhaps we could call in our favors from Korea and get America to send her supercarriers to the Persian gulf! It's not too late to liquidate the Ba'ath menace!
Methinks our government would much prefer to send more diplomatic insults. Or rely on the *almighty* United Nations for some silly half-hearted measures... worldwide embargo, perhaps? Ineffective in any case, i'm sure.