-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
- Status
You wouldn't have to fill in every little junior minister, just tell us the 8 or 10 most important posts so we know who's who.
I agree, after all the Liberals being in the government and the rise of the Bevanites does mean its unlikely we'll have an OTL Cabinet, so just knowing whose at FO/HO/Exchequer etc. would be interesting.
Well let us hope that these Soviet Socialists in the labor party wins
Then the working class will get scared of them and vote for the party that is truly in their best interest; the NLP. Just wait and see, if thos continues we will soon be bankrupt, poverty and a failing industry that will be outsourced and replaced by other countries. A vote for labor or communist party is a vote for poverty and hunger 
I'm curious, do you think a vote for the Liberal party is better or worse than one for Labour or the Communists? Curious, since your party split off from the foremost of those three.A vote for labor or communist party is a vote for poverty and hunger
Last edited:
At least the liberals value individual liberty and rule of law, and not collectivism and "equality".
What a shame. Pity what has happened to the Liberal Party, used to be a proud party fighting for liberty, now carries labour's water and pushes socialism. Gladstone must be rolling in his grave.
What happened do the great liberal thinkers like Herbert Spenser.
What happened do the great liberal thinkers like Herbert Spenser.
If all parties never changed their views, My Honourable Friend, the Tories would resent you for bring able to vote.
They were superseded by awesome Liberal thinkers like Keynes and Beveridge.
awesome thinkers? I think not. They do not inspire awe, my friend.
Of course, Herbert "Who now reads Spencer?" Spencer is still greatly revered and inspires awe in even the most cynical of hearts.
Well, some of us value what you stated, but merely wish to be benevolent rulers of state and provide for our people. That, and support the honourable Mister Attlee. Not all of Labour is pseudo-communist.
They were superseded by awesome Liberal thinkers like Keynes and Beveridge.
Tanzhang can you remind me of what Keynes said recently? Oh that he was wrong! Keynes himself said that he was wrong and that the free-market is the best way to go.
And it is not,weird considering that the state are going to use a lot more money and simply cover the losses by printing money. Oh that went very well for Germany and Austria in th interwar period!
At the same time you want to have complete control over the economy and in the end the morals. You are per definition totalitarian.
Well, the goverment directly interfering with state's economy worked miraculously in Germany 33' and onward, though, so there's that.
(
)))
Well, the goverment directly interfering with state's economy worked miraculously in Germany 33' and onward, though, so there's that.
(
Oh yeah! They just bought it all on credits! You do know that all their money was burrowed? That they "promised" to pay them back? Oh yeah, they saw it as an investment for war. And I don't know how good it is for the population to have an economy based upon steel and weapons industry.
But of course Contravictus, if you support socialist economies geared for war, then fine by me
All this wasteful talk about economics. Blah.
We should revive Operation Unthinkable. Much better plan.
We should revive Operation Unthinkable. Much better plan.
- Status