The Westminster System - A British Interactive AAR

[unmerged(271387)]

uhh,I don't think the Conservatives policies err... fit well with my idea of what should be done.
I can't imagine how happy Contravarius will be if a fascist/absolute monarchist party appears

 

[Enewald]

Bloody hell I'm seriously concidering voting Labour! Damn National-Liberals and their conservative policies. Wanting to ban communism? Wanting to damage the unions? And send on troops to Northern Ireland if the Northern Irish government wants it?

And I like the liberals too, however they want to have less military spending and not going into Indonesia and being neutral in the Northern-Irish crisis?

And the Tories, well they also have unacceteble Northern-Irish solution.

Ah someone persuade me, why should I vote for your party?



True, but Monetarism is basically Keynesniasm without the financial politics. It is only the Monetary politics and emphasis on a free-market. It is quite moderate If it was extreme, it would be extreme rightwing Keynesniasm

Heretic!
Search your feelings!
Do you truly feel like we need a more powerful state?

 

[LordTempest]

uhh,I don't think the Conservatives policies err... fit well with my idea of what should be done.

Conservative and Unionist Party - because if the vote-switcher is against them, then they must be alright!

 

[unmerged(271387)]

*rambling*
Do you truly feel like we need a more powerful state?

Yes
Also, I can't possibly understand who you are referring to as vote - switcher

 

[Contravarius]

uhh,I don't think the Conservatives policies err... fit well with my idea of what should be done.
I can't imagine how happy Contravarius will be if a fascist/absolute monarchist party appears

It's Prince dom Contravarius to you, peasant!
((Yup, on that glorious day I shall sing songs and s*** rainbows, pal.))

 

[ThaHoward]

Heretic!
Search your feelings!
Do you truly feel like we need a more powerful state?

Like the national liberals? Let us see what they want, to ban communism? To interefere in private organizations? They also want Monetarism. So it will be state intereference And since the Liberals are in their expansive period, and the Conservatives are status-quo it will more or less be the same.

If the Liberals are truly Keynesian they would privatize the industries now, instead of nationalizinf them So tax cuts pluss privatization might be for the better But of course, they are going to nationalize their industries. Hmm I need to think hard about this. Set uå a pro and con list.

 

[LordTempest]

Like the national liberals? Let us see what they want, to ban communism? To interefere in private organizations? They also want Monetarism. So it will be state intereference And since the Liberals are in their expansive period, and the Conservatives are status-quo it will more or less be the same.

Let us not forget that our freedums end where Enewald's anti-socialism begins.

 

[unmerged(271387)]

Let us not forget that our freedums end where Enewald's anti-socialism begins.

That is only for our glorious cult of Hayek to answer

 

[ThaHoward]

I got voters to think of after all. Most here are socialists and support unions :laugh:

 

[Enewald]

Like the national liberals? Let us see what they want, to ban communism? To interefere in private organizations?

We are better than the Weimar Republik, a democracy does not need to tolerate elements that are hostile to the concept of democracy.

 

[unmerged(271387)]

We are better than the Weimar Republik, a democracy does not need to tolerate elements that are hostile to the concept of democracy.

Oh Great, comparing us to the Weimar Republic again.
Where has the world gone to.
It needs to tolerate them, so that their hostility to democracy is shown to the people. Otherwise, you turn them to martyrs.

 

[Battle bunny]

CPGB. Again. (I wonder if a non-Stalinist communist party, or at least CPGB faction, is going to emerge? By communist, I mean something that doesn't water down communist ideology, but rather just goes for a different denomiation... Trotskyist, Left-Com, even An-Com or whatever.)

 

[ThaHoward]

We are better than the Weimar Republik, a democracy does not need to tolerate elements that are hostile to the concept of democracy.

Free speech is free speech. Political freedom is political freedom. Freedom is freedom no matter what. If we start to bend rhe freedoms a little in the name of security, we deserve neither.

Also if we let these extremists talk, we will expose them for who they are. They are driven by hate and martyrism. If we fully endorse them and let them talk, tehy got bothing to base their politics on. No hate

 

[Contravarius]

You know, for some reason, all these comparisons to Weimar Republic make me feel warm and fuzzy inside.

 

[DensleyBlair]

LIBERAL PARTY! Woo!

EDIT: Don't worry, guys. We shall have our own Francafrique

Welcome! A very good choice, if I may say so myself. Your various accoutrement will be with you shortly.

 

[unmerged(271387)]

You know, for some reason, all these comparisons to Weimar Republic make me feel warm and fuzzy inside.

Oh, I wonder why

 

[LordTempest]

I got voters to think of after all. Most here are socialists and support unions :laugh:

I resent that comment.

 

[ThaHoward]

I resent that comment.

I was merely joking

 

[LordTempest]

Also if we let these extremists talk, we will expose them for who they are. They are driven by hate and martyrism. If we fully endorse them and let them talk, tehy got bothing to base their politics on. No hate

This has been Tanzhang's attitue to Mr. Enewald for the past 120 years.

 

[ThaHoward]

This has been Tanzhang's attitue to Mr. Enewald for the past 120 years.

You have lived that long?

But you can't compare them. He basically want no state intervention. While the communists want the opposite.

Contravictus on the other hand..