Actually, at this point in time, a Vichy Britain sounds pretty good, really.
((Erh, I'm off to sleep. KingHigh, give her hell.))
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
- Status
((Erh, I'm off to sleep. KingHigh, give her hell.))
After your...previous statements, I might have to turn liberal.
((Character.))
Even how terrible his views are, we must allow him air his opinions. I ful,heartly disagree and are disgusted by his views. But I will figt for his rights to say so. Also through education and enlightenment we will show others how faulty and horrible these values are.
And furthermore I do support that he and others may believe so, but I do not support the idea that they may implement it. Everyone, imo, should be free from moralism and coercion from other individuals or the state.
So tell me, would you like to live in the National Socialist regime we fought against? Are our rights and liberties still so pointless?
((If I post in double brackets I'm talking out of character, without them, I'm playing a character. My views on the whole Vichy-thing might differ from yours, but I'm usually smart enough never to talk about this OOC, mostly because I like to get along with people.
Also, this kind of self-parody is incredibly refreshing, sometimes. Opens up new perspectives and whatnot.))
Last edited:
I'd rather not live in a National Socialist regime because I'd be dead for different reasons. And in relation to rights and liberties, I don't think they are pointless, I just don't think that governments should be tied in their existence to them.
So you don't think for exmple that the National Socialist regime were wrong? Shouldn't it for example be basic rights and linerties that prevents such crimes in the future?
Most think that only indoviduals can conduct crimes, but governments are just as capable of commiting crimes.
I proudly agree with you on around 48% of the issues.
(Going to start roleplaying a bit now)
We must remember that businesses are just as capable of crimes and should just like the state be held accountable.
As to what I agree on: Feminism and sexual rights, institutional transparency and I assume Rehabilitative justice.
(roleplaying wise I'm a swing vote between labor and the liberals, obviously care about sexual minorities as I am one)
Yes, and those who run the bussinesses are ultimately individuals. The same with the government for that sake. Never said anything against that. If a bussiness for example start to assassinate the competition or send out thugs to wreck their competitors property - then they have to face the consequences.
And good to see others sympathising with the Feminist Alliance.
((And I'm a sexual miniority as well, but that is not why I've chosen the feminist-sexual diversity path
))
((And I'm a sexual miniority as well, but that is not why I've chosen the feminist-sexual diversity path
Same for me but the leading cause of most human action is self interest
Same for me but the leading cause of most human action is self interest
Sound like a real Classical Liberal or Libertarian to me!
l
((Technically in most Western countries you're actually the sexual majorityYes, and those who run the bussinesses are ultimately individuals. The same with the government for that sake. Never said anything against that. If a bussiness for example start to assassinate the competition or send out thugs to wreck their competitors property - then they have to face the consequences.
And good to see others sympathising with the Feminist Alliance.
((And I'm a sexual miniority as well, but that is not why I've chosen the feminist-sexual diversity path
))
Sound like a real Classical Liberal or Libertarian to me!
Not quite, far too statophile and economic interventionist for that but I'm a liberal of some sort.
But it's always better to get something you can agree about done first.
In other news I'm glad Sinclair got to be leader when the liberals came roaring back.
- Status