We are not really sure they are going to use the 3d kind of technology for there eu2 like games, right?
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
it's not the time yet! but in the future, when EU4, HoI3 and CK2 will leave their shelves, we will play a 3d simulation strategy game
I promise you that!
I promise you that!
Originally posted by Nikolai
I really hope that PAradox won't use TW style of combat!
I agree that a 3d gaming engine may not work well with EUII or CK due to the time line etc. I dont mind the 3d Battles, if the AI is competent its very challenging and a great dynamic to the game.
Who knows what will happen in the future, but the the 3D engine was purchased by Paradox, so its logical to conclude it might make it into a future title. So as far as system requirements HOI, and EUII arent very taxing, MTW (as an example) for me was.
Personally, would love to see a Paradox game soely on the Napelonic period, with 3D battles. That would be great.
Personally, would love to see a Paradox game soely on the Napelonic period, with 3D battles. That would be great.-Odin
Now that would make sense. Otherwise, i am anathema toward 3D battles in Paradox games.
Now that would make sense. Otherwise, i am anathema toward 3D battles in Paradox games.
Likely the purchased 3D tech. is to be used in games such as Mutant Chronicles and Conan and not in EU type games - but that is just my guess...
I was guessing the same, perhaps some 3d in eu type of game in a few years from now.
Originally posted by Phillip V
I have a 850 MHz processor and 896 MB RAM, and even then I still have qualms over EU2 speed. I pray for those who have even slower system!
you have more ram then your pc clocks why is that good ?? just cueries
Because EU2 (and related games) use a lot of RAM.Originally posted by pit
you have more ram then your pc clocks why is that good ?? just cueries
I know that but its much more ram then I 'm just to see and I work allday white cad/cam software but thanxs for the answer
I have 1GB on my home PC. I like itOriginally posted by pit
I know that but its much more ram then I 'm just to see and I work allday white cad/cam software but thanxs for the answer
At work we have a workstation with 2GB RAM for some heavier CAD 3D stuff...
I was actually going to say that Or maybe they're going to make a game version of the "Free Company" of AAR fame, with epic EU2-era battles that puts "Cossacks" and "Medieval" to shame
Perhaps the unamed "GH" project is 3d somehow?
Getting back to the orignal point, I thought the screenshot looked about right. Like EU and HoI with appropriate differences. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Or maybe they're going to make a game version of the "Free Company" of AAR fame, with epic EU2-era battles that puts "Cossacks" and "Medieval" to shame Perhaps the unamed "GH" project is 3d somehow?
Getting back to the orignal point, I thought the screenshot looked about right. Like EU and HoI with appropriate differences. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Don't forget that the other subdivision of the parent company Paradox Entertainment makes non-strategy games that use 3D environments.Originally posted by frenchie
maybe they aim for space with the 3d?
Universum universalis, even more to conquer
Are you sure about that? I mean i've read that there is another company Paradox, totally unrelated to Paradox Entertainment, maybe you've mistaken them for Paradox subdivision?
Rather than expanding into 3-D battles and such, I'd much rather have Paradox take advantage of increasing PC power to make their games even more in-depth and complex (i.e. huge numbers of gameplay factors to track, even larger maps, more complex battle variables, and so forth). I buy Paradox Games for strategy and gameplay, not eye candy - give us more of the former
I'd still like more tactical control than is present in EU2 or HOI. Not the same as say Legion, but some compromise of the two....
Erm....
EUII looked twice as good as HoI did. And from what I've seen of the first CK screenshot (and from long practice of knowing how little a final version often differs from the first screenie) I would say that EUII will still look better.
Hell, EUII's map looks better then the Medieval: Total War one!
In any case, I really hope I'm wrong, since the first screenshot that Johan gave us of CK looked appalingly ugly, considering it was supposed to be the Levant.
EUII looked twice as good as HoI did. And from what I've seen of the first CK screenshot (and from long practice of knowing how little a final version often differs from the first screenie) I would say that EUII will still look better.
Hell, EUII's map looks better then the Medieval: Total War one!
In any case, I really hope I'm wrong, since the first screenshot that Johan gave us of CK looked appalingly ugly, considering it was supposed to be the Levant.
Thankfully, gameplay counts alot more then how something looks, and I am really looking forward to a game which focuses more on dynastic issues then how much gold you can amass which imo , is boring and done many times before.