Enewald/
Kurt_Steiner: So you two will be voting for McNary, I presume?
Viden: I checked. The Spanish have about a dozen warships in total (including three transports), whereas the Germans have a stack of 30 warships in the Meditteranean.
In other words, the Spanish utterly bamboozled the Imperial Navy and have trapped their Meditteranean Fleet over ten thousand miles from home.
Nathan Madien: American politics is a rather unstable thing these days, so you may very well be right.
BipBapBop: Roosevelt probably gave a speech in Boston, but probably not the one you were hoping for.
-----
The Presidential Election - Part II
Like in 1936, the presidential election of 1940 was a unique moment in the United States' electoral history. In 1936, Americans flooded the polls in unprecedented numbers, their votes contributing to the most divisive and important election since 1860. In 1940, millions of Americans stayed home, either out of apathy, or protest, or because their state had yet to be reincorporated into the Union; whereas the 1936 election was defined by how many voters cast their ballot, the 1940 election was defined by how many were denied that right.
Because of this, it did not take long for the results to start coming in. Initial returns seemed to favor McNary; Maine, Vermont, and New Hampshire all went Republican by comfortable margins, overturning Roosevelt's gains from '36. The rest of New England, however, remained true to the incumbent, with Boston's substantial bloc of syndicalists turning out in support of the Democrats: Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Connecticut were Roosevelt's.
Few were surprised to see New York once more went to its native son, this time without the razor-thin margins. But the outcome of the remainder of the East Coast had been anyone's guess; the former-National voting bloc had always been unpredictable, and it remained to be seen if the syndicalists of New Jersey and Pennsylvania had been won over by the 'New Deal' and the President's policy of reconciliation. The outcome was noteworthy in its unanimity: all the remaining East Coast states gave Roosevelt a majority, save for Georgia, which had yet to readmitted into the Union owing it the devastation of the Federal army's march on Atlanta.
Proceeding further west, what states of the Old Northwest thta could vote went Democrat by wide margins: Ohio, Indiana, and Wisconsin. The remaining Southern states were far more uncertain. Roosevelt succeeded in gaining Kentucky's electoral votes, as well as Tennessee's by the slimmest of margins; the TVA no doubt provided Roosevelt the boost he needed to clinch victory. But the old 'Solid South' seemed to be dead forever: Alabama, Mississippi, Arkansas, and Louisiana all returned Republican majorities. Texas, of course, voted overwhelmingly for Roosevelt, with Oklahoma following its example.
In the Midwest, McNary's accusations of Roosevelt's syndicalism won few ears. Bolstered by the successes of the 'New Deal' and rising food prices caused by the war in Europe, the farm vote swept the region for Roosevelt; even Kansas, the only Midwestern state to boast a Republican majority in '36, went over. The Rocky Mountain states, however, split; McNary gained Idaho, Montana, and Nevada, while Roosevelt carried Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, New Mexico, and Arizona. On the West Coast, the outcome was never in doubt: boasting sizable Republican majorities, McNary carried all three with ease. Before midnight, America had its president.
Franklin Delano Roosevelt - Henry Wallace (Democratic Party), 22,459,818 votes (59.7%), 374 electoral
Charles McNary - Frank E. Gannet (Republican Party), 15,125,512 votes (40.3%), 97 electoral
Unreconstituted States, 0 votes, 0 electoral
TOTAL: 37,585,330 votes (100%), 471 electoral
The 1940 election was a decisive victory for Roosevelt and the Democratic Party as a whole. Though the Republican Party had indeed made substantial progress in recovering from its 1936 nadir, it had yet to find a way to convince voters to repudiate Roosevelt's reforms, or to offer itself as a viable alternative for many Americans who still looked upon the President was the enemy.
Though the electoral results told a different story, McNary was not the feeble push-over Curtis had been in 1936, nor was the pall of the apocalyptic Hoover administration hovering over his head. McNary had campaigned vigorously and attacked Roosevelt on multiple fronts, his gains in the South and Rockies proof of this. Rather, McNary was in many respects a victim of circumstances, forced to be the standard-bearer of a party riven with disunity and haunted by the specter of secession and the failed policies of the '20s and '30s. Had a new Syndicalist party emerged to challenge Roosevelt for the loyalty of left-wing voters, the outcome may have been dramatically different.
But one cannot easily discount Roosevelt's talents, of which he had many. A master politician, Roosevelt managed to entrench himself in a strategic central position, from which he could pull votes from both sides of the political spectrum. Campaigning on his record, Roosevelt exploited his oratorical strengths to their greatest extent, garnering votes from the men and women who had sought to overthrow him, emphasizing his record as a proven reformer to coat the bitter pill of defeat.
The 1940 presidential election gave Roosevelt a clear mandate in domestic politics, regardless of the fact he actually received over four million fewer votes this time around. The reform program that had heralded the return of economic prosperity would continue, and the lenient treatment of rebels could go unchanged, the Navy would be rebuilt, and so on. What the election did not give Roosevelt was a mandate in the realm of foreign policy. Since Roosevelt had campaigned on his record, and the United States had no foreign policy, voters were hardly being asked to take a vote of confidence. So long as the conflict in Europe remained locked in stalemate, Roosevelt could avoid commitment indefinitely; the aid packages were stalling tactics, meant to control and limit the extent of American involvement while stimulating the economy.
The United States had come a long way since the chaos and discord of the 1936 election. The forces of moderation had been upheld and revalidated, but the trying times were far from over.